The Spectacle Blog

Big Chief Crook Abramowich

By on 1.10.06 | 11:52AM

Expert source Fergus Bordewich identifies the 1988 Indian Gaming Regulatory Act as the primary virus that has infected all of Congress and transformed business as usual graft into a national threat. It is moments before we become the United States of America versus the United Casinos of America, and guess who, with 228 tribes and 405 gambling operations in 30 states, has bought dozens of members of both Federal houses and hundreds of members of state legislatures to protect its interests and silence the opposition? Confessed big chief crook Abramowich was working for Congress-created Big Chief Crook. The sham of Indian gaming rights is the same sham as one for the road rights. There is no rationality in granting the abused native American descendants a license to endorse lawlessness and suicidal vice; and there is no excuse for pretending not to notice that organized crime and ravenous state legislatures now exploit the casinos as robber kingdoms preying on the elderly and stupid. Abramowich exploited the exploiters; he was not much more than a disease carrier like Typhoid Mary.

Send to Kindle

Most Fevered Brow of the Week

By on 1.10.06 | 10:58AM

I know. I know. It's only Tuesday, and most fevered brows are scowling at Judge Alito. But none compare with Bob Fitrakis of the Columbus Free Press, who offers the following:

"The Bush administration’s utter contempt for the U.S. Constitution and the specific information we now know about its use of the National Security Agency (NSA) surveillance network should further call into question Bush’ 2004 presidential “election.” In a recent revelation, we have learned that the NSA shared the fruits of its illegal spying on behalf of Bush with other government agencies.

"What are e-voting machines and central tabulators that pass the voting results over electronic networks from the internet to phone lines? No more than data easily spied on and tapped into...

Send to Kindle

Finally, a Question

By on 1.10.06 | 9:46AM

Pat Leahy drones about his own biography... "with that in mind," and asks about the Concerned Alumni of Princeton. This is the biggest ammo these guys have. So Sam Alito opposes Ivy League liberals. Next question?

Send to Kindle

Watch Mrs. Alito

By on 1.10.06 | 9:35AM

She's facially expressing what her husband can't as Leaky Leahy waxes poetic about his frequent diatribes against tyranny on the Senate floor

Send to Kindle

No Super-Duper?

By on 1.10.06 | 9:03AM

Specter called Casey v. Planned Parenthood a "super precedent" and "super stare decisis." What, not "super-duper precedent," as he termed it in the Roberts hearings?

Alito: "I personally wouldn't get into categorizing precedents, or super precedents, or super-duper precedents."

Send to Kindle

Browbeating the Nominee

By on 1.10.06 | 8:58AM

Arlen Specter is coaxing Sam Alito into affirming the "living Constitution" (that is, the meaningless Constitution). So much for no ideological litmus test.

Send to Kindle

Immigration Reform? A Better Idea

By on 1.10.06 | 8:52AM

The Central American clown show -- meeting in Mexico City -- reportedly demanded that the US allow more immigration and legalize the illegals already here. I have a better idea.

Those nations - especially Mexico - that, as government policy, export their troubles to us, should pay a high price for doing so. All of these countries are on the dole. We should deduct $100,000 from their foreign aid grant for every illegal from their nation captured here (with double the penalty for everyone caught more than once). I'm just throwing that figure out. It may be far too low.

The tinfoil-hat crowd that rules most of these nations might get the message if illegal immigration started costing them money, instead of us.

Send to Kindle

Blunt Talk

By on 1.10.06 | 8:47AM

Interesting the the Blunt camp last night was spinning to folks that they almost had the election wrapped up for GOP Leader.

This election does not have the feel of one that will be short and sweet. We're hearing that both sides are whipping each other's "confirmed" endorsements pretty aggressively. That's not an indicator that anyone is confident that they are close to victory.

Send to Kindle

Pages