The Spectacle Blog

Re: In the Real World…

By on 12.5.05 | 11:25AM

Dave: It's even better than lying. What could Richardson possibly be saying when he claims, "I had been told by various scouts that I would be drafted if I signed." What in heck is that supposed to mean? If you sign with a team, that precludes your being drafted. The normal (sane) procedure is that you're drafted and then sign. The other way around is an impossibility. A Clinton lawyer might claim that what Richardson meant is that the scounts were telling him he'd be drafted if he signed with them. But scouts aren't agents. Maybe Richardson learned to talk that way during his trips to North Korea.

Send to Kindle

Pirro or Not?

By on 12.5.05 | 11:15AM

The New York Post reports her husband contributed to the moves, behind her back, last week by New York Republicans to convince her to pursue the N.Y. AG race instead of the U.S. Senate. Mrs. Pirro and Hillary have even more in common than we'd thought.

Send to Kindle

Re: Iran’s Nuke

By on 12.5.05 | 11:11AM

Jed, when formal diplomacy fails, our friends in Israel will still take seriously the threat posed by a nuclear Iran. Israel is the world's Leatherman in the world's utility belt in these situations, TAS contributor James G. Poulos reminds us.

Send to Kindle

In the Real World, We Call it Lying

By on 12.5.05 | 11:00AM

New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson makes light of his false claim to have been drafted by the Kansas City A's years ago to Time Magainze:

LAST MONTH YOU ANNOUNCED THAT, AFTER RESEARCHING THE MATTER, YOU DETERMINED THAT THE KANSAS CITY ATHLETICS HAD NEVER DRAFTED YOU. HOW COULD YOU MISREMEMBER THAT DETAIL FOR FOUR DECADES? I had been told by various scouts that I would be drafted if I signed. When it appeared in the official program of my team that I had been drafted, I assumed it was correct. However, the mistake was mine. I should have checked. Obviously, it's become a little bit of an instance where I dropped the ball. Get it, Karen?

I GET IT. I GET IT. Get that? Dropped the ball?

Casual with the truth for years. Hilarious.

Send to Kindle

Swift John

By on 12.5.05 | 10:42AM

Back during the time of his Paris travels, John Kerry liked to dismiss the South Vietnamese army during the Nixon administration's efforts at "Vietnamization" as "Quislings" (which evidently, since these South Vietnamese were collaborating with the U.S., made us the Nazis). Now apparently he's all for "Iraqization." Yesterday on CBS's Face the Nation with Bob Schieffer, he insisted: "You've got to begin to transfer authority to the Iraqis." But then he did Dick Durbin one better:

"And there is no reason, Bob, that young American soldiers need to be going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children, you know, women, breaking sort of the customs of the -- of -- the historical customs, religious customs. Whether you like it or not, Iraqis should be doing that."

John Kerry really is a sicko.

Send to Kindle

Galen’s Latest

By on 12.5.05 | 9:52AM

We're sure that to a certain generation of female, Republican and conservative stalwart, Rich Galen, is an attractive, even a sexy man. So be it. But for the rest of us, he's also a smart man, as evidenced by his latest "Mullings."

Meanwhile, up on Capitol Hill there is a growing sense among Republicans that something has to be done about the appropriations process. Over the next year it should be interesting to see which GOP House member with a jones for leadership figures out how critical this issue is and uses it to pry the Majority Leader's mantel away. If someone doesn't, it may be the Minority Leader's mantel they are competing for.

Send to Kindle

More Saddam Trial Antics

By on 12.5.05 | 8:42AM

It seems Saddam Hussein's trial is facing larger challenges than security: the defendant is proving less than cooperative, staging a walk out today. Perhaps they could seat him in a room, provide a video connection, and get on with the trial.

Send to Kindle

Iran’s Nukes

By on 12.5.05 | 8:07AM

Seems like only last August that our intel guys were doubling their estimate of the time Iran would consume before achieving its nuclear weapons ambitions. The experts on whom I rely say Iran is about one to two years away. Actually, it WAS last August that the intel guys said never mind five years, it'll be at least ten years before the Iranians can make the world safe for Islamic terrorism.

That was then. This is now. As the Jerusalem Post reports this morning, Mohamed el-Baradei, Nobel laureate and Chief Magoo of the International Atomic Energy Agency, now says that our pals in Tehran are only months away from having a bomb or two or three or four.

Send to Kindle

Condi at Bat

By on 12.5.05 | 7:45AM

Secretary Rice continues to astound, and take unprecedented actions, such as use the considerable bully pulpit of the State Department to actually support American goals and objectives. The consternation at Foggy Bottom must be enough to, say, blow some of the fog out of there.

Dr. Rice leaves for Europe, where the EUnuchs have organized a reception that includes demands for disclosure of the CIA overseas detention facilities where terrorists are held. UK foreign minister Jack Straw sent her a letter last week demanding details. Rice, as has CIA Director Goss and Defense Secretary Rumsfeld -- and the president -- said we do not torture detainees. Here, again, the damage already being done by the McCain amendment. Torture is already illegal, and will continue to be regardless of the fate of McCain's misbegotten and thoroughly misunderstood amendment.

Send to Kindle