This is the second part of a four-part series about how
Republican governors are proposing innovative ideas that help
minorities. As I’ve explained here, this
is a vigorous response to Sam Tanenhouse’s “Original Sin: Why the
GOP Is and Will Continue to Be the Party of White People.”
“…they look through that old Declaration of Independence, they
find that those old men say that we hold these truths to be
self-evident, that all men are created equal. And then they feel
that that moral sentiment taught in that day evidences their
relation to those men.” –Abraham Lincoln to a group of immigrants,
1858
Republicans confront the issue of immigration with a view
towards both national sovereignty and free market opportunity. With
these foundations, Gov. Rick Perry of Texas and his administration
presents the nation with two planks of immigration reform; these
reforms will benefit the many who immigrate to our nation,
especially those of Mexico and Central America.
A Warning About the Welfare State: Texas’s Dream
Act
As Abraham Lincoln, our Grand Old Party’s first president,
explained to those immigrants in 1858, citizenship means
understanding the ideals of our Founding Fathers. The nation trusts
its citizens to govern themselves and to physically realize the
self-evident rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
The acquirement of private property through self-reliance helps to
fulfill this dream of liberty.
Gov. Perry, with his policy of college education for
undocumented students and enhanced border security, along with
Agriculture Commissioner Todd Staples’s guest worker program,
presents a viable Republican road to reform.
In 2001, Perry signed a bill allowing undocumented
immigrants to
pay in-state tuition at Texas colleges and to receive state
financial aid. As he explained to The Huffington
Post in 2011:
And we decided as a state in 2001 that to deal with this
population we had one of two choices: we could either kick them to
the side of the road and say we’ll deal with you as a tax waster,
or we’re going to give them the opportunity to pursue citizenship,
to pay in-state tuition… and be part of an educated workforce.
While Perry has allowed students to apply for state financial
aid, Texas has taught the national GOP that, as Joshua Trevino of
the Texas Public Policy Foundation explained to me, “If you want to
create an atmosphere of pragmatic solutions, curb the welfare
state.”
Congressmen such as Rep. Paul Ryan and Sen. Rand Paul are
working to do just that. However, Texas has also given the national
GOP two platforms that it should incorporate into any immigration
reform bill.
The First Foundation: Border Security
While Perry did receive some flack for subsidizing undocumented
students in the Republican primary, he can also point to his border
security operations manifested in Operations Linebacker and
Drawbridge. These border initiatives focus on securing parts of the
border that the federal government has neglected.
Linebacker, started in 2005, provides funding and manpower to
local law enforcement along the Mexico-U.S. border.
Perry signed Operation Drawbridge into law in 2011. It utilizes
portable cameras to detect movement along the border; according to
Josh Havens, Perry’s deputy press secretary, this program has
helped to detect 18,500 movements on the border, leading to 7,670
apprehensions and the seizure of 42,490 pounds of narcotics.
“Gov. Perry remains adamant that securing the border must be the
number one priority of any immigration plan, and it must contain an
iron-clad commitment to upholding the rule of law to ensure that
those who have violated it are not rewarded for their
lawlessness,” Havens emphasized.
This legislation preserves the rule of law by defending
America’s borders, ultimately helping new citizens and new legal
immigrants.
The Second Foundation: Conditional Status, Proof of
Employment, and Citizenship Application
To help reform the immigration system, Commissioner Todd Staples
has proposed a guest worker policy to solve our illegal immigration
problem.
Half of Texas’s construction workers are undocumented, while
Dallas and Houston both have more immigrants per capita
than Boston,
Philadelphia, Seattle, and Chicago. As the state with the
second-most immigrants in the nation, Texas realizes the need for
expansion of employment visas both for low-skill and skilled
workers.
“For real immigration reform to take place, we must establish a
policy that secures our borders, enforces existing laws and
implements a Penalty Not Pardon plan,” Staples wrote in an
op-ed. “We also must revamp our failed visa system for guest
workers and international day laborers, and modernize our
ports.”
Specifically, he advocates the establishment of a “temporary,
six-month, conditional status.” During “this period, we should
require a candidate for legal resident status to pay a fine, submit
to a criminal background check and secure verifiable
employment.”
Those who surpass these hurdles will be granted an employment
visa; for anything more, immigrants will have to apply for
citizenship from their home countries.
These foundations provide innovation and a sufficient starting
point for conservative immigration reform. Both these men are
Republicans in a solid red state; while one supports border
security, the other supports an expansion of the visa system.
Again, much like Gov. Bobby Jindal in Louisiana and President
Abraham Lincoln, a Republican and his administrative body
(agriculture commissioner is an elected position in Texas) is
advancing reform to expand opportunity for all groups of people,
minority and majority.
Mike W| 3.20.13 @ 1:52PM
This is an absurd proposition that somehow we must help "minorities" even though they are illegal aliens. 1/2 of the state's construction workers are illegal. Think of what that would do the unemployment and wage situation if those workers weren't there.
No amnesty. No outreach to illegal aliens. No more government benefits for illegal aliens.
Texas will be purple or blue soon enough. There will never be another Repub president,or if there is the GOP will not resemble anything that it looks like today.
It's disappointing how absent the Spectator has been in the amnesty debate. They are appear to be part of that party elite that does not give a flip about what the vast majority of the GOP membership want.