It’s a bit like the old Democratic congressiona trick of
not applying new regulations to Congress. Too expensive, of
course!
It turns out that President Barack Obama’s supporters—at least
those rich or important or influential enough to serve in his
Cabinet—apparently don’t much like ObamaCare. Too expensive,
of course!
Reports
The Hill:
Sally Jewell, President Obama’s nominee to lead the Interior
Department, defended waivers her company received from part
of Obama’s healthcare law as she testified before a Senate
panel Thursday.
Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) pressed Jewell on healthcare waivers
granted to REI, the chain of outdoor apparel stores where she
serves as CEO.
During his major healthcare push in 2009, Obama publicly praised
Jewell and REI for offering healthcare benefits to the
company’s part-time employees. But after the healthcare law
passed, REI received a waiver from new rules restricting the
plan it offered to part-time workers.
Of course, Jewell made a rational business decision. But
what kind of law says that it is cost-effective, moral, and all
sorts of other good things, but needn’t be applied to those who can
convince the Prez that they deserve a waiver from those same
cost-effective, moral, and good provisions? And why does the
president appoint people to his Cabinet who can’t be bothered to
fulfull the law that was his primary objective during
this first term?
Bob K| 3.8.13 @ 10:35AM
Nothing in Obama care will apply to any of our elected representatives or to their top appointees. That should be clear by now.
Tom Kyba| 3.8.13 @ 11:52AM
Actually, I'd like to know why you guys don't cover this aspect of Obamacare more often. When you're sitting in the emergency room waiting 4 hours to get treatment, do you think you will EVER see one of your local politicians waiting as well?
EVER?
Mike G| 3.8.13 @ 1:41PM
Why should king's lackeys been required to follow the law? They support him simply because he protects them from what he requires of the commoners.