Why did the Obama Administration allow the release of hundreds
of undocumented immigrants from detention during the same week of
the sequester deadline?
Yesterday:
Citing the ongoing fiscal pressures, U.S. Immigration and
Customs Enforcement has released “several hundred” immigrants in
deportation proceedings from immigrant detention facilities.
“In order to make the best use of our limited detention
resources in the current fiscal climate and to manage our detention
population under current congressionally mandated levels, ICE has
directed field offices to review the detained population to ensure
it is in line with available funding,” ICE spokeswoman Gillian
Christensen said in a statement. “As a result of this review, a
number of detained aliens have been released around the country and
placed on an appropriate, more cost-effective form of supervised
release.”
Note that sequestration does not even occur until March 1. In
fact, both critics and supporters are confused about the
timing:
But the timing has struck both critics and supporters of the
move as unusual, as the sequester won’t even take effect until
March 1. Doris Meissner, Clinton’s former commissioner of the
Immigration and Naturalization Service, says it’s unclear whether
the decision is intended to show “how damaging sequestration is” —
or whether it’s intended to be a constructive policy shift meant to
acknowledge “the fact that a lot of people subject to deportation
aren’t hardened criminals.”
On Monday, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano asked,
“I’m supposed to have 34,000 detention beds for immigration. How do
I pay for those?”
Of course, ICE isn’t dropping deportation cases for any of these
released immigrants; they’re monitoring their travels during their
prosecutions. ICE is also prioritizing the detention of serious
criminal offenders.
The timing of these releases certainly seems suspicious. While I
am not cynical enough to accuse the Obama Administration of
political manipulation, why is ICE releasing hundreds of
undocumented aliens this week, of all weeks? Just a few days after
the White House released 51 different reports describing the
negative effects of the sequester on all 50 states, along with the
District of Columbia?
I’ll let the reader decide.