Ben Bernanke claimed that state and local government budgets
seem to have stabilized, in response to a question by New York Rep.
Gregory Meeks about why the economy lost 600,000 public sector
jobs. Meeks claimed this would be the equivalent of one percent of
the unemployment rate.
Later on in the hearing, Congressman Dan Kildee (D) of Michigan
discussed the topic in greater depth:
“We’ve seen recently over the last couple years and even in the
last few weeks a significant number of downgrades in municipal
debt…which represents a symptom of a much larger
problem—municipal insolvency generally. We’ve seen Vallejo,
California; Harrisburg Pennsylvania; Camden New Jersey; my own home
town of Flint, and now we see Detroit facing this insolvency. The
state based solution to these problems typically have been
replacing the existing management with different management that
can presumably make different decisions that result in outcomes
that are more favorable. I think what we’re facing, in my opinion
and in my work across the country, is something much bigger than a
failure in management but a structural failure, and what I think is
potentially another institutional failure in the urban setting in
municipal governments. I’m interested in your thoughts about the
implications of that trend if you agree that it is taking place on
our economy, and what solutions the federal government might
consider if any to deal with that.”
Bernanke answered that “the last years have been a very
tough time for state and local governments not only are income
taxes down but property taxes have come down as well. As a
result, state and local governments have cut work forces, cut
capital programs. Many have managed to steady the ship, others
are still under a lot of stress. obviously in the short term trying
to promote job creation, what we’re asking Congress to do, is going
to help economic activity in these areas and bring in tax revenues.
There are obviously some parts of the country where there are
longer term, more structural problems that are more than just the
business cycle. Some of those may be in your state. There, I don’t
really have the solution. The federal government did not in the
past involve itself that much with stressed municipalities.”
Kildee followed up, “The federal government hasn’t involved
itself in a lot of things until the necessity became clear and what
I’m concerned about is that some state governments may not have the
capacity, and cities failing will be a national problem, one way or
the other.”
aware| 2.27.13 @ 6:54PM
One way or another Leviathan will grow and grow until there is no such thing as "local" anything. And criminals like Bernacke will continue to plunder and make the most important decisions, far more important than presidents, instead of standing in the docket awaiting a piano wire and lamp post with his name on it.
He is currently engineering not a "recovery", but a catastrophe of epic proportions. Future readers will wonder how such madness could pass as "policy", and be accepted by the public, as we do looking back at the Germans in the '30s.
Bob Grant| 2.27.13 @ 7:04PM
Not a friggin' penny for these failed, spendthrift states and cities.
NOT A PENNY!
axbucxdu| 2.27.13 @ 10:17PM
He who prints when backed by the barrels of guvvie guns, wins! Twas, and will always be, thus.