Why didn’t Senate Republicans initiate immigration reform with
visa reform for skilled, educated immigrants? They should have
drafted a bill immediately after the election.
The comprehensive approach requires visas for entrepreneurs to
be linked to those of low wage laborers.
Per The Washington Post:
Republicans have proposed increasing the number of visas for
skilled immigrants by cutting the number available for unskilled
immigrants—a trade-off that Democrats oppose.
The United States does not have a specific visa for young
entrepreneurs, unlike Canada and Chile.
President Obama and some in Congress have proposed a “start-up
visa.” Mark Krikorian of the Center for Immigration Studies
responded to this in the following way to the Post:
“It’s a stupid idea,” said Mark Krikorian of the Center for
Immigration Studies, which supports tighter immigration controls.
“What is an entrepreneur? Businesses come and go.”
While the Republican Party laments the stupidity of President
Obama’s policies and Sen. Rubio works to draft a probably
insufficient “comprehensive” immigration bill, China, Canada, and
Chile poach our foreign-born graduates:
China has given bonuses of up to $150,000 to thousands of highly
skilled expatriates…Chile is luring top talent with $40,000 in
capital, free office space and a quick visa through its “Start-up
Chile” program…On April 1, Canada plans to launch a start-up visa
program giving entrepreneurs immediate permanent residence.
Our graduating immigrants don’t want to go home. They want to
invent and work in the United States. Meanwhile, we want their
determination and talents for science, math, engineering and
technology.
Again, why didn’t the GOP draft a bill expanding the H1-B visa
for foreign workers who have started their own businesses?
Currently, only employees of U.S. firms are eligible for these, but
not those who’ve created their own start-ups.
Instead, we chose to pursue the “comprehensive”
approach.
So goes economic innovation. So goes policy
innovation.