Tired of unionized government workers who agitate for public
policy changes on your dime, at odds with your political
preferences?
Then now is a good time to get behind legislation U.S. Reps.
Phil Gingrey (R-Ga.) and U.S. Rep. Dennis Ross (R-FL) have
introduced that would put an end to “official time” — a
controversial practice that allows federal employees to conduct
union business during working hours unrelated to their work
responsibilities.
In January, Rep. Gingrey introduced HR 107, which would prohibit
the federal government from paying employees while they are
conducting union business. Rep. Ross is an original co-sponsor.
Official time is estimated to have cost taxpayers $1.3 billion over
10 years, according to a press release from the congressman.
Earlier this week, Rep. Ross introduced HR 568, with Rep.
Gingrey as an original co-sponsor. The bill calls for the
Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to submit an annual report to
Congress on the use of official time by federal employees.
This is a strong one-two punch that is very deserving of support
not just from conservatives, but all concerned taxpayers. Public
employees who are part of a union have every right to express
themselves and to lobby for policy changes. But they should not be
permitted to advance their agenda during working hours at taxpayer
expense.
“Rep. Gingrey and I worked together to introduce two bills that
would address time reporting by federal employees, specifically as
it pertained to union activities,” Ross said in a press release.
“In 2011, federal employees spent roughly 3.4 million hours — at a
cost of $155 million to the taxpayer — conducting union business
while on duty in 2011. At a time when our country is more than $16
trillion in debt, we need to ensure that we are cutting all
wasteful spending of taxpayer dollars, no matter for which
political side the union employees are advocating.”
RJ| 2.7.13 @ 9:57PM
Its a good bill. I would like to add an amendment. Phase out all federal defined benefit pensions. Defined benefit pensions allow today's politicians to curry favor and pass the bill to taxpayers decades later. We need to transition to defined contribution plans; just like in the private sector.
And if we are serious about cutting the deficit, how about a hiring freeze on the number of federal government workers?
RJ| 2.7.13 @ 9:57PM
Its a good bill. I would like to add an amendment. Phase out all federal defined benefit pensions. Defined benefit pensions allow today's politicians to curry favor and pass the bill to taxpayers decades later. We need to transition to defined contribution plans; just like in the private sector.
And if we are serious about cutting the deficit, how about a hiring freeze on the number of federal government workers?
Mike G| 2.8.13 @ 8:19AM
It will never get out of Reid's Senate, dropped in the trash can just like the budgets the House sends over.