-
Senator Frank Lautenberg, R.I.P.
June 3, 2013 | 8 comments
-
Activist Saves Colorado From Massive Tax Hike
May 28, 2013 | 0 comments
-
Updated: NBC News: Holder Personally Approved Fox Reporter Warrant
May 24, 2013 | 10 comments
-
Obamacare is a Big and Growing Problem for Democrats
May 24, 2013 | 5 comments
-
Dismantling Networks, Preventing Footholds
May 23, 2013 | 3 comments
The Spectacle Blog
By a show of hands (or comments), who would rather be Clinton-free and who would rather be Obama-free?
Here’s a thought experiment for you:
If you could remove Obama as president but replace him only with Hillary Clinton, would you do it, with the caveat (because I think the question is too easy otherwise) that Hillary would be able to run again in 2016 whereas Obama won’t?
View all comments (7) | Leave a comment
More Blog Posts by Ross Kaminsky
http://spectator.org/blog/2013/02/02/clinton-free-follow-up
Follow us:
ADVERTISEMENT
Current Issue
- The Lehrman Standard
- The Continuing Crisis
- Confessions of a Soft-Drinking Newspaperman
SPONSORED LINKS
FLASHBACK TO: 1995
-
Pope Culture
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
-
Why the GOP Does Not, Like, Totally Suck
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
-
Dames at Sea
-
In the Absence of Guns
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
-
The Metaphysical Martini
-
Counting the Costs of Clintonism
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
-
Chuck McHagel
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
-
The Legacy of Old John and Mother Fresh-Roasted
-
It’s the Best Time of the Year
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
-
The Bush Crack-Up
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
Clip of the Day
ADVERTISEMENT
fmm| 2.2.13 @ 2:26PM
There is almost no difference in the political stances of these two, so stick with the known terrorist, particularly since he can not run for office again.
Pecos Pete| 2.2.13 @ 3:40PM
fmm: Agreed!
Bandido| 2.2.13 @ 3:40PM
Ross,
As much as I despise Obama, and he's the most despicable president in history, by a longshot, I wouldn't hesitate to take him over H. Clinton. She is the phoniest of phonies. A godawful speaker. Ignorant of the world, of American history. A thoughtless nonentity. At least Obama made it on his own, without riding the coattails of a famous name. Just maybe he penned his books without a ghostwriter. Clinton, on the other hand, could not write her own name with letter blocks. Yes, it takes a village, a village of ghostwriters, to put her in print. Had she an obscure name, she couldn't have gotten elected to the Harper Valley PTA. So, it's Obama by a country mile in this little race.
RJ| 2.2.13 @ 3:51PM
Both are radical leftist, corrupt and lawless. We had a reminder of the Clinton brashness recently when she said "what difference does make?" to a question relating to the Administration lying to the American public over cause of the deaths of a US Ambassador and embassy staff.
In 2008, I would have picked an unknown disaster over a known corrupt disaster. Now my answer is, what difference does it make?
Glen H| 2.2.13 @ 5:31PM
I am not sure I get the premise of this, as Hillary can run in 2016 either way.
I would take her over Obama only because I think she would be willing to bargain with reality when it intrudes on her goals, whereas Obama's approach is to just press on, regardless.
Indy| 2.2.13 @ 5:58PM
To learn more about Hillary, read The Shadow Party, she is hard Left, friend of Soros, believer in global governance, redistribution of wealth and too friendly to the Muslim Brotherhood.
If I had to choose, I think I would vote present.
c. j. acworth| 2.4.13 @ 8:40AM
As a former Secretary of State (whose name esapes me just now) once said, "At this point, what difference does it make?"