“Violence is a big problem. Too many children are dying. Too
many children. We must do something.” Former congresswoman
Gabby Giffords appealed to the Senate Judiciary Committee
on Wednesday with these words to request quick action to
prevent gun violence.
From the very beginning of the “What Should We Do About Gun
Violence?” Senate hearing, I detected an underlying reverence
for the 2nd Amendment, beginning with Senator Patrick Leahy’s
description of it as a “fundamental, individual right.” Until
Senator Dianne Feinstein started speaking, the focus of the
hearing was mostly universal background checks and enforcement
of existing federal laws.
This brought to my attention a fine organization named “Don’t
Lie for the Other Guy,” a national coalition of the Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and the National
Shooting Sports Foundation. They are both working to prevent
the illegal purchases of firearms by “straw purchasers,” which
is already a federal crime.
As a conservative, I am skeptical of brand-new, innovative
legislation. Wayne LaPierre’s testimony further convinced me
that the federal government under the Obama Administration
has neglected to prosecute existing gun crimes. While I
understand the country’s reliance on the federal government to
do something, it has already done many things which remain
negligently unenforced.
As LaPierre stated in his testimony, federal weapons
prosecutions per capita were down 35 percent in 2011 from
their peak in the Bush Administration (as calculated from DOJ
data accessible here).
Out of the 76,000 federal background denials in 2010, the ATF
referred only 62 of those to federal prosecutors. Of these 62,
prosecutors declined 18, while only 13 resulted in a guilty
plea by the defendant.
U.S. attorneys charged 22 people for submitting falsified
information, along with 11 convicted felons for possessing
firearms and seven domestic offenders for holding weapons.
With the recent mass shootings, violence is obviously a big
problem; that’s why we have prosecutors to uphold the law that
enforcers apply. Where are they in this debate?