The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Coming to you directly from the Hart Senate Office building where the Senate Judiciary Committee is conducting the first hearing on gun regulation since the Newtown mass shooting, entitled, “What Should America Do About Gun Violence?”

Chairman Leahy’s (D-VT) exchange with NRA Executive VP Wayne LaPierre has been the most interesting so far. Mr. Leahy challenged Mr. LaPierre to answer a yes-or-no question of whether the latter believed background checks for sales at gun shows should be extended to those between private individuals, which are currently exempted under the so-called “gun show” loophole. “Do you support instant criminal background checks at gun shows, yes or no?” He had begun his line of questioning by noting that, in 1998, Mr. LaPierre stated that he did.

After much dancing and dodging, Mr. Leahy threw down a gauntlet, insisting that Mr. LaPierre answer the question directly. Should we have mandatory checks for all gun sales, he asked. Does the NRA believe that?

“No, we do not,” Mr. LaPierre finally conceded, parrying, “I do not believe that the way the laws are working at present,” it would make sense to extend the background check requirement to private sales. He referred to at least 44 laws on the books related to illegal possession and use of firearms, and specifically decried cases under said laws which “this administration is failing to prosecute.” (Later on, fellow-witness David Kopel referred to a University of Syracuse study that found a dramatic decline in such prosecutions since their 2004 peak under the Bush Administration.) 

Mr. LaPierre made a few other points. Mr. Leahy eventually cut him off — “my time has expired” — but took a few moments to add, smiling, that that was not the question he was asking. There was laughter from the public gallery.

Not as many sparks are flying as might have been anticipated, but they are certainly not absent.

View all comments (4) |

Peej| 1.30.13 @ 12:26PM

Only 4% of the 40% who purchase privately buy firearms from gunshows. Most of the vendors at gun shows are federally-license.
http://www.washingtontimes.com.....hole-myth/

In fact, that forty percent number isn't even accurate, according to the Post.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/....._blog.html

JimH| 1.30.13 @ 12:48PM

It is easy to quantify those killed with a gun. What is not so easy is to count how many lives have been saved because someone was able to defend themselves or others with a gun and how many crimes deterred because a criminal thought that the potential victim might be packing. Most of the focus is on regulating weapons. We might be better served if the attention was paid, not to the weapons, but to would be owners. Perhaps some sort of license or certification showing that the holder is of sound mind, not a criminal and has passed an approved gun safety course should be required for a purchase. As for the spate of mass killings, I suspect that if the press did not publish the shooter’s name much of the incentive would be removed. Of course the MSM would not like this. They would claim it infringed on the freedom of the press. I guess some parts of the Bill of Rights or more important than others.

Albert Constantine Jr.| 1.30.13 @ 12:52PM

On the two occasions in the early 1990s where I purchased a handgun from a private individual at a gun show, they had me fill out a copy of 4473 for their records.

Bob K| 1.30.13 @ 5:13PM

If you buy one from a legitimate vendor there is a record somewhere of it's sale which, in all likelihood, the government can access.

More Blog Posts by Luca Gattoni-Celli

http://spectator.org/blog/2013/01/30/live-from-senate-judiciary-3

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

ADVERTISEMENT