The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Scouts Coming Out

The Boy Scouts of America has long been targeted by liberal groups playing the discrimination card over its membership restrictions. CBS News reports that the BSA is now reconsidering its stance on gay members.  

Deron Smith, a spokesman for the BSA, said, “The policy change under discussion would allow the religious, civic, or educational organizations that oversee and deliver scouting to determine how to address this issue.”

The BSA reaffirmed its policy of excluding gays only last July. At the time, Smith said maintaining the ban was “absolutely the best policy” for the Boy Scouts.

Scouting officials will make a decision about the policy at a national board meeting next week. 

View all comments (38) |

AllAmericanAmerican| 1.28.13 @ 4:07PM

Let's have gay men be boy scout leaders. Then we can let heterosexual men be girl scout leaders. I mean why not, right?

Everything gays touch turns to s***. Not surprising when they get off on sticking their members in other men's stinkholes.

hmm_contrib| 1.28.13 @ 4:25PM

*whew* A good thing straight people don't do that!

AllAmericanAmerican| 1.28.13 @ 5:45PM

Sooooo...straight men have anal intercourse with other straight men? Wouldn't that make them...gay?

RCV| 1.28.13 @ 4:42PM

Scouting was started by Lord Baden-Powell .... who was gay.

AllAmericanAmerican| 1.28.13 @ 5:47PM

Wrong. W.D. Boyce founded the Boy Scouts of America.

Nice try tho kook.

RCV| 1.28.13 @ 7:35PM

Scouting was started by Lord Baden-Powell. It spread to countries around the world, including our own. Do some research.

AllAmericanAmerican| 1.28.13 @ 8:56PM

You are wrong. W.D. Boyce founded the BSA. Which is what we're talking about---not the fairy British scouts---the BSA.

No go masturbate to your "Lord Fairy Takes Me Camping" fantasy, agenda boy.

fmm| 1.28.13 @ 4:24PM

What parent in their right mind would allow a son or daughter to join scouting if gays are in leadership positions? Might as well sign them up for the sex trade to Asia.

RCV| 1.28.13 @ 4:43PM

Do you allow your daughter to play on a sports team if the coach is a heterosexual man?

mike 3/505| 1.28.13 @ 5:29PM

No....unless there is a female chaperone.

RCV| 1.28.13 @ 7:36PM

If there's a female coach, aren't you concerned she might be homosexual?

spike59| 1.29.13 @ 5:57AM

I don't allow my daughter's coach to take her on overnight camping trips...nice try with the whole 'apples and oranges' thing, though

dullard

Derek Leaberry| 1.28.13 @ 4:33PM

What sort of parent would allow their teen-aged son to go out in the woods with a homosexual? The
Boy scouts are just another institution the left has won.

And another question. What has the conservative movement ever conserved?

aware| 1.29.13 @ 6:20AM

The factory for Making Excuses For Failure is still operating pretty much as it always has.

When it comes to rear guard action in retreat, "conservatives" are in their element.

RCV| 1.28.13 @ 7:39PM

And I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure that what the Boy Scouts are discussing is ending the automatic discrimination against gay scouts, not scout leaders.

RCV| 1.28.13 @ 7:41PM

I stand corrected. What they're considering doing is leaving it up to the sponsoring organizations -- churches, schools, etc. -- what policies they will have with respect to rules on sexual orientation of both scouts and scout leaders.

JimH| 1.29.13 @ 7:43AM

So if a chapter of NAMBLA wants to sponsor a scout troop, it would define the terms of membership? What could go wrong?

Rich D| 1.28.13 @ 7:59PM

Well, this Eagle Scout will fight it.

AllAmericanAmerican| 1.28.13 @ 8:58PM

I guess I don't understand why gays just start their own gay scout group?

spike59| 1.29.13 @ 5:58AM

they have one; it's called "The Village People"

grant1863| 1.28.13 @ 9:53PM

Because it has nothing to do with starting a new group but ruining the existing ones that stand for something. I'm with the other Eagle Scout about fighting this or mailing back the Badge to the local council.

Occam's Tool| 1.28.13 @ 11:52PM

Sorry. I think it is a bad idea to let Gay Scoutmasters in. I'm not a fan of Gay Scouts, either. I'm a Conservative. Scouting has worked just fine as it is.

Gays should start their own scouting organization; sorry. This is NOT a subject that should be broached to young boys entering their time of sexual identification. Scouting teaches appropriate sublimation. Sorry, but supervisory personnel should be above reproach.

AllAmericanAmerican| 1.29.13 @ 9:45AM

OT the reason I suggested it is how long do you think it would really last? I mean what kind of parent is gonna have their kid join the "Gay Scouts of America" with Bruce and Dion as your faaaaaaabulous scout mashters and send them away on camping trips?

The point is gays NEED to infiltrate organizations and destroy them from within. Why? To corrupt and destroy anything that is American or wholesome. Because they know Gay Scouts would never work, and you can't sue anyone if nobody joins your club, but you CAN sue people if they don't ALLOW you to join theirs.

Effing homos man....just go be gay. Do what you wanna do without having to push your garbage lifestyle on the rest of America.

AllAmericanAmerican| 1.29.13 @ 9:47AM

But hey, can you imagine the badges they'd give out in Gay Scouting? Ugh!

RCV| 1.29.13 @ 11:47AM

You obviously spend a LOT of time thinking about those badges, don't you?

AllAmericanAmerican| 1.29.13 @ 1:56PM

Uh oh are you playing the "you're against gay so that means you must really be gay yourself" card? Holy cow. You got nothing.

Then again, what kook does?

Answer the question...if this is *really* about scouting why don't some influential rich gay celebutards or something start the "Gay Scouts of America?" What's stopping anyone from doing that? Why go through all the trouble in court to try and strong arm the BSA when the "GSA" coulda been up and running YEARS ago?????

Why?

AllAmericanAmerican| 1.29.13 @ 1:58PM

EDIT: It is supposed to say "You're against gay *whatever* so that means you must really be gay yourself."

Don't know why that got edited out???

Simon Templar| 1.29.13 @ 10:19AM

Once again, failure to see the REAL issue here and the unstated premise.

I will use caps to perhaps get it through....

THE LEFT IS FORCING ITS "VALUES" AS THE ONLY ACCEPTABLE SOCIAL, RELIGIOUS AND POLITICAL VALUES ON A PRIVATE ORGANIZATION. It assumes the right to DICTATE to all and the rest of us what will be acceptable and what is not. Nothing else will be tolerated or acceptable.

Simon Templar| 1.29.13 @ 10:23AM

So, if you are a private club, association, religious group, anything, beware, you no longer have rights to define your values, your membership, and your identity.

RCV| 1.29.13 @ 11:49AM

I think what BSA is considering is allowing the private club, association, religious group that sponsors the scout troop to do precisely that. Seems to me YOU are the one insisting that your values are the only acceptable social, religious and political values for everyone else.

Simon Templar| 1.29.13 @ 12:40PM

You should ask that question to your homosexual activists who want to force their view of a perverse sexual behavior as normal and acceptable on a private institution that thinks differently and has said so in the past when they attempted to force it on them.
You should ask them why they do not create their own scouting program and why they insist that a group that does not hold to their viewpoint on the matter must conform to their "values."
You do not know shit.
If that were the case, they would be essentially destroying the groups national identity and its commonly shared code of conduct.

AllAmericanAmerican| 1.29.13 @ 2:01PM

Which is exactly the point I made in the beginning....everything gays touch turns to sh*t. THAT is the endgame.

If it was simply about scouting RCV woulda had a bunch of little confused, "gay" preteen boys out in the woods faster than you can say "bugger."

Simon Templar| 1.29.13 @ 10:36AM

The constitution itself is now being openly attacked and calls for it to be rescinded are being proposed on network (CBS, I believe) television program featuring some academic and others as a legitimate item for consideration and discussion. It is now being trashed and presented as a useless and outdated document.

When will conservatives wake up that this is an undeclared LEFTIST war on this culture, its institutions, and its very founding documents.

Sports is now being infiltrated and scrutinized and politicized. The boy scouts can line up behind the multitude of other institutions under attack.

RCV| 1.29.13 @ 11:52AM

You don't believe people should be able to treat the Constitution "as a legitimate item for consideration and discussion"? On the pages of TAS, the dissolution of the Union is so treated by folks just like you. Are you to define what is acceptable "as a legitimate item for consideration and discussion" by everyone else?

Simon Templar| 1.29.13 @ 12:35PM

You know what I said, so do not twist my words.
What is being proposed is dispensing with it altogether and writing a new one. I do not believe people like yourself should define what is acceptable, politically correct, what is wrong and what is right, and how people should think and live. That is what you do everyday. Nor do I support people who flagrantly violate it like your fraud president.
You should ask that question to your homosexual activists who want to force their view of a perverse sexual behavior as normal and acceptable on a private institution that thinks differently and has said so in the past when they attempted to force it on them.

Simon Templar| 1.29.13 @ 12:45PM

Just as you have worked so hard to destroy my rights of freedom of speech, my right to arm myself, my freedom of religious expression, my soda intake, and nearly everything that moves or sets under the sun that you deem unacceptable. Tyrant.

RCV| 1.30.13 @ 12:58PM

I've spent my whole professional career defending the First Amendment rights of everyone to speak and write freely no matter what their views, and the rights of religious free exercise for all, so I'm not quite sure what you mean, Simon. And unless you are a convicted felon, or a person with mental disabilities that make you potentially dangerous to your fellow citizens, I support your right to keep and bear arms. I also believe that New York's stupid efforts to regulate the size of soda purchases are, well just plain stupid as well as offensive.

Simon Templar| 1.29.13 @ 10:37AM

Scouts coming out? Leftist coming in....

More Blog Posts by Teresa Mull

http://spectator.org/blog/2013/01/28/the-rainbow-troop

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

ADVERTISEMENT