The Spectacle Blog

Slandering Alito

By on 1.9.06 | 10:20AM

Having lost his witness who was prepared to attack Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito for his activities at Princeton University 30 years ago, we've learned that Sen. Patrick Leahy is looking to add a new witness to replace him.

Last Friday Leahy lost Stephen R. Dujack after it was revealed that, among other things, he equated the eating of meal with meat to the Holocaust. Dujack was a Princeton alum, who was prepared to attack Alito for his membership in a Princeton alumni group.

Now, Leahy's staff is looking to add to its panelists another Princeton alum to attack Alito for his time at Princeton: Prof. Sally Frank, currently a teacher at Drake University, and a Princeton grad in 1980. Frank was a well-known campus political activist who protested -- among other things -- apartheid in South Africa and the failure of Princeton to provide locks on bathrooms. She is best known for her lawsuits to make Princeton's famous eating clubs co-ed.

A Democratic Judiciary Committee staffer says no decision has been made on adding Frank.

Send to Kindle

Alito’s Rise

By on 1.9.06 | 10:18AM

This is perhaps one of the best pieces I've read on how Alito came up through the ranks. Sure, the Post is obsessed with appellation (Reagan's policies weren't just policies but conservative policies), but the Post is also familiar enough with the give and take of luck and preparation so characteristic of political grooming that it doesn't immediately attribute Alito's rise to some cabal of conservative conspirators. It also puts to rest some talking points of the left.

Whereas some people are likely to talk about his role in dismantling affirmative action, the Post evenhandedly provides evidence that Alito was no racist:

Send to Kindle

The Heartless Right

By on 1.9.06 | 9:19AM

A New York Times reporter is killed in a heinous crime, and how do some on the right react? Not too humanely, I'm afraid. Disgracefully, crudely, barbarically, in fact.

Send to Kindle

A Dignified Statement

By on 1.9.06 | 9:06AM

After his breakfast meeting with Judge Alito, President Bush offered praise for his nominee and guarded optimism for the hearings:

And my hope, of course, is that the American people will be impressed by the process. It's very important that members of the Senate conduct a dignified hearing. The Supreme Court is a dignified body; Sam is a dignified person. And my hope, of course, is that the Senate bring dignity to the process and give this man a fair hearing and an up or down vote on the Senate floor.

Methinks the President isn't holding his breath.

Send to Kindle

Not Just a Pretty Face

By on 1.9.06 | 8:30AM

Republicans electing Rep. Mike Pence as majority leader would do more than "send the right message," writes TAS contributor James G. Poulos. With this "rigorous, kinetic, unfreighted" man at the helm, Republicans would regain the initiative.

Send to Kindle

Cantor

By on 1.9.06 | 8:30AM

So Rep. Eric Cantor and his backers are trying to clear the field for House Republican Whip with word that he has upwards of 110 caucus member backing him. Cantor was an early dark horse for GOP Leader, and he is popular among conservatives.

It's interesting that Rep. Mike Pence has not been able to gain any traction coming out of the appropriations fight he so honorably fought.

Send to Kindle

Setting the Alito Plate

By on 1.9.06 | 8:25AM

So High Noon it is.

Word out of the White House and Capitol Hill is that Samuel Alito will most likely not go the Chief Justice Roberts route and go unscripted for his opening statement.

Committee Chairman Arlen Specter and his staff were working over the weekend to coordinate and map out what will happen today. Specter appears ready, according to sources, to push back against his liberal critics and give him some running room. We shall see.

As we learn more, we'll post more.

Send to Kindle

Jumping the Filibuster Gun

By on 1.9.06 | 6:53AM

If I were a Senate Democrat who had it out for Judge Alito, I would keep a much better poker face than the showboaters who hit the TV studios Sunday morning. I would say I'm looking forward to hearing from the nominee, have some concerns, and remain firm but upbeat. But instead Schumer, Feinstein, Leahy, and Kennedy openly threaten a filibuster before the hearings even begin. How do they expect to be taken seriously when they show their cards before Alito's said anything in the hearings?

Send to Kindle

Welcome, John!

By on 1.9.06 | 5:03AM

My son and I consider "The John Batchelor Show" the one absolutely indispensable radio broadcast. To our disappointment, WRKO in Boston (THE Talk Station, as they style themselves) has dropped the Batchelor show in an evening re-shuffle. The Celtics occupy most early evenings; the post-10 slot gets a re-run of Michael Savage.

With my birthday coming up, I have asked my wife for two long-range AM radio antennas so we can reliably pull in New York's WABC.

You will be a credit to the AmspecBlog, John. Welcome, welcome!

Send to Kindle

Zbiggy’s Sour Choice

By on 1.8.06 | 5:34PM

Zbigniew Brzezinski - he whose Solomonic wisdom led us from the Shah to the Mullahs' kakistocracy - has delivered himself of another masterpiece in today's WaPo. He, like the rest of the lib hierarchy, can't stand the idea that we can and may win in Iraq. So he rephrases the "cut and run" suggestion of Pelosi, Murtha and the rest into a choice between "cut and run" (which he paraphrases to a 'relatively prompt disengagement') and a prolonged military occupation that the American people won't support. Does anyone doubt his preference?

Zbiggy says the prez should call in several Dems (such as George Mitchell) to redefine victory. How? In terms of "...an attainable yet tolerable outcome in Iraq." In other words, Brzezinski wants to redefine victory in terms of an acceptable level of defeat. Anyone who is surprised, please go to the back of the class.

Send to Kindle

Pages