Commenting on the opposition to the possible nomination of Chuck
Hagel as Secretary of Defense, Jeffrey Goldberg of The
Atlantic
opines that President Obama should appoint former Nebraska
Republican because he is the only thing standing between Israel and
its self destruction.
Goldberg argues that if the Jewish Home Party becomes the third
largest party in the Knesset and/or joins Benjamin Netanyahu’s next
coalition government “it will bring about the destruction
(self-destruction) of Israel” through the construction of more
settlements, the absorption of West Bank Arabs and turn Israel into
the Jewish equivalent of a Sharia state. Goldberg goes on to say
that these policies “would turn Israel into a pariah state.”
So what does any of this have to with Hagel? Goldberg states,
“Maybe, at this point, what we need are American officials who will
speak with disconcerting bluntness to Israel about the choices it
is making.”
O.K., where do I begin?
First, I don’t see how the Jewish Home Party is any different
from any of Israel’s other Orthodox religious parties much less
yield more power.
Second, perhaps Goldberg should attend a sitting at the UN
General Assembly. Israel is already treated as a pariah nation.
Third, where the hell has Goldberg been the past four years?
President Obama, Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton and, for that matter,
both Secretaries of Defense (Bob Gates and Leon Panetta) have made
tough public statements criticizing Israel’s policies concerning
settlements. In fact, the Obama Administration has been far tougher
in its rhetoric on Israel building homes than on Iran building
nuclear bombs. Their rhetoric has been counterproductive to say the
least.
Given the Obama Administration’s sour disposition towards Israel
I suppose Hagel won’t say anything worse about Israel than what has
already been said. Still, methinks appointing Hagel as Secretary of
Defense would be like asking Michael Vick to walk your dog. In
other words, I hope President Obama won’t unleash Hagel on
Israel.