The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

UN Ambassador Susan Rice has formally withdrawn her name from consideration to be the next Secretary of State. She will remain in her current position.

Despite the strong support of President Obama, Rice could never escape the fact that she repeatedly said the attacks in Benghazi on September 11, 2012 were a spontaneous reaction to the anti-Muslim YouTube video as opposed to a terrorist attack. This did not inspire public confidence nor did she in subsequent meetings inspire the confidence of key members of the Senate especially that of Susan Collins.

The liberal media portrayed the criticisms of Rice as part of “the war on women” targetting John McCain and Lindsey Graham for scorn. But if Rice had been nominated, it would have been interesting to see what role Collins would have played during the confirmation hearings.

In her letter to Obama, Rice stated, “The position of secretary of state should never be politicized.”

Of course, what she really means is that Republicans have no right to criticize the public statements of a cabinet official in a Democratic administration.

President Obama decried the “unfair and misleading attacks” on Rice but in reality he is breathing a sigh of relief. As long as Rice was under consideration, it kept Benghazi in the public arena. Perhaps not on the front page but still a part of the public discourse. Now that Rice is out of the picture, Benghazi will be joining her.

Chances are Obama will now appoint John Kerry who will be easily confirmed. The Senate isn’t going reject one of their own.

View all comments (4) |

C Bowen | 12.13.12 @ 6:34PM

Kerry was a big supporter of invading Iraq so I agree, Conservative Inc won't complain since they came around to Kerry's position that Iraq was scary and Saddam very mean.

Simon Templar| 12.14.12 @ 10:02AM

Knock it off with the conservative inc bullshit and the continual slam and falsehoods against conservatives, troll.
The whole democratic party was behind the invasion including the Clintons who stated we should strike Saddam with or without WMD.
The whole nation and numerous nations had intelligence that Iraq was indeed a threat, involved in international terrorism, and attempted to assassinate US president.
I am sick of this whiny, twenty twenty rear view vision and continual revision of history by both the liberals and their libertarian cousins.
Was the war fought intelligently, was an 8 year occupation necessary and wise, was it worth the 20 billion each month of spending, did it inevitably cause more problems for the US?
Legitimate questions, yes.
If you were one of the hundreds of thousands he killed in his purges, yes, he was scary and mean, asshole.

RCV| 12.14.12 @ 11:49AM

Susan Rice would have been a far better Secretary of State than weasely John Kerry ever will be. Not an improvement for the nation.

J.C.Eaton| 12.14.12 @ 12:53PM

Brother Goldstein, I was taken by your last line: you mean like the Democratic controlled Senate did to Sen. John Tower? Best,

More Blog Posts by Aaron Goldstein

http://spectator.org/blog/2012/12/13/thoughts-on-rices-withdrawal

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

The IRS Immigration Fraud Scandal

Jeffrey Lord | 6.18.13

Foreign Policy as Farce

Jed Babbin | 6.17.13

The Biggest Fool of All

Doug Bandow | 6.17.13

Can Liturgical Music Be Saved?

Patrick O'Hannigan | 6.17.13

Obama's Climate of Intimidation

Matthew Sheffield | 6.18.13

Revenge of the Fruitcakes

Peter Hitchens | 6.17.13

The Mole in Don Draper

James Bowman | 6.17.13

Whither Suburbia?

Steven Greenhut | 6.18.13

ADVERTISEMENT