Tonight we saw the benefit of being battle-tested: After two
cycles worth of Republican primary debates, Mitt Romney has gotten
pretty good at this. His boardroom consultant style — distilling
complicated ideas into short digestible bites — shone in the
one-on-one format like it never has before.
And we saw the downside of consistently good press coverage:
After years of being treated with kid gloves, Obama showed that
when he’s off his game, he’s really off his game. Obama’s answers
— professorial at best, rambling at worst — might have worked
fine in a press conference, but the contrast with Romney was
striking.
No serious person will argue that Romney didn’t win this debate
handily. The best spin
Obama’s own spokespeople can come up with is that Romney only
won on “style.” The question now is how much it will move the
needle; it will be very interesting to watch the polls in the
coming days.
By the way, I’m not sure why PBS chose to replace veteran
broadcaster Jim Lehrer with what I can only assume was a part-time
substitute teacher who looks just like him, but it was good for
some laughs.
BackToBasics| 10.4.12 @ 12:22AM
Great that Romney won. One of the reviews I read spoke about how Obam was not able to hit Romney about his wealth.
I've got an answer that Romeny should give when accused of being wealthy:
Romney should say, "This election is not about how wealthy I am or how wealthy the president is because he is a multi-millionaire too. This election is about the future of America and what direction we want to pursue...."
spike59| 10.4.12 @ 5:37AM
how about this: "we Republicans are constantly being accused of catering to the wealthy; maybe it's because we espouse policies designed to encourage and empower as many people as possible to BECOME wealthy. The Democrats, on the other hand, seem to cater to the poor; maybe it's because they...well,you do the math"