So.
The names are CBS reporter Jan Crawford.
And NPR reporter Ari Shapiro.
These are the names of the reporters now caught on audio
coordinating their questions on the Middle East to Governor Romney.
The audio scoop was
uncovered exclusively by the aptly named
RightScoop.
Then Newsbusters followed through (here),
identifying two of the reporters as CBS reporter Jan Crawford and
NPR’s Ari Shapiro.
Shapiro had earlier been identified by Newsbusters
(here)
because:
“As a reporter I’m torn about joining in the pledge of
allegiance/national anthem at rallies. I’m a rally observer, not a
participant.”
Hint: Shapiro sits during these moments.
One can only laugh out loud at this nonsense.
If Mr. Shapiro isn’t a participant, what in the world is he
doing “covering” a campaign rally in the first place?
Non-participants are somewhere else.
Of course he’s a participant. And as his actions both with the
pledge/national anthem and the Romney questioning incidents clearly
show, he is decidedly both a cultural and political
participant.
Furthermore, in Shapiro’s case, this is an NPR reporter. And as
Juan Williams — no conservative — learned the hard way, what one
NPR executive called “NPR’s values” are in fact the “values” of the
hard-left. One suspects that if Mr. Shapiro were in a situation
where the value in question was not saluting the flag but, say,
saluting abortion or gay marriage or voting for a liberal black man
for president or some such Shapiro would be saluting these
proverbial flags post-haste. That is where the liberal herd runs,
and Shapiro wants to run with the liberal herd. If he doesn’t —
like Juan Williams Shapiro would instantly be tossed out of the
left-wing Culture Club that is NPR.
Again, let’s run that quote about the journalists covering JFK
from Teddy White’s Pulitzer Prize-winning book The Making of
the President 1960:
By the last weeks of the campaign, those forty or fifty national
correspondents who had followed Kennedy since the beginning of his
electoral exertions into the November days had become more than a
press corps — they had become friends and, some of them, his most
devoted admirers. When the (campaign) bus or the plane rolled or
flew through the night, they sang songs of their own composition
about Mr. Nixon and the Republicans in chorus with the Kennedy
staff and felt that they, too, were marching like soldiers of the
Lord to the New Frontier.
Mr. Shapiro is either not smart enough to understand the
impression his conduct has left (doubtful) — or he is defiant
about his own cultural and political biases and has every intention
of inserting them into his coverage of the presidential
campaign.
What Shapiro and Crawford were quite openly about yesterday was
constructing the liberal media narrative on Romney. Or, as Teddy
White put it, “marching like soldiers of the Lord” for the liberal
narrative, the liberal agenda. They just didn’t think they
would get caught at it. They were.
Within hours the RightScoop scoop was posted. Rush
Limbaugh had it. Sean Hannity had it, both on his radio show and
his TV show. Now NewsBusters has the identity of two of
the “journalists” involved.
Again, as we also noted of the media in
that piece on NewsBusters a few weeks back:
The game afoot here is to shape a narrative… a moving negative
narrative of conservatives and Republicans that is molded afresh
every night and every day…. No matter the issue — economics,
national security, or social issues like abortion, race, same-sex
marriage or whatever — the goal always and forever is above all to
advance the liberal narrative.
They are players. Not umpires. Participants. Not Referees.
Shapiro and Crawford are now outted as exactly this.
They are participants. Partisans.
The goal is not to report the news. The goal is to shape the
liberal narrative.
The only difference in 2012 from, say, 1960, is that the New
Media is here. Rush. Sean. Levin. Talk radio. Fox. The
Internet.
Everybody knows what Ari Shapiro and Jan Crawford are about.
The game is over.
RJ| 9.13.12 @ 1:24PM
You are right Jeff, much of the media are partisans. It isn't meida bias, it is media propaganda.
I am surprised that Jan Crawford is involved in this matter. I read her book on the Supreme Court and thought she was a good, objective reporter. I will have to look into this matter in more detail.
PCPSmokerII| 9.13.12 @ 9:24PM
That's not what you posted on Hillyard's blog spot. Make up your mind. You sound like an idiot and a loser.
RJ| 9.13.12 @ 11:17PM
You are always colorful and since I know you are not a troll, I will point out that there is roughly a 4 hour difference in the posts, during which time I listened again to the audio clip. Not that it will please you, but I think the dialogue is subject to different interpretations of intent. Until better evidence comes forward, I am willing to give Ms. Crawford the benefit of the doubt and focus my actions against those who clearly are propagantists.
Occam's Tool| 9.13.12 @ 6:27PM
These are the same scumbags who would want the American military to rescue them should they be "observing" military action. See Mike Wallace, American Traitor, who stated that if he knew American troops were about to be ambushed, would not tell them, but would expect American troops to rescue HIM if he were a hostage.
PCPSmokerII| 9.13.12 @ 9:23PM
Quinn Hilliyer is once again bashing you for criticizing one of his lovers. First it was Rubin, now, despite all evidence, it's this Crawford.
Do what you did before. Set him straight and kick his ass.