Last Thursday I
noted how the Washington Post so cleverly reformatted
its daily “headline” emails in a way that facilitated burying
stories coming out of the Republican Convention way “down the
scroll,” so to speak.
On Friday, it seems, the Post decided to spike the
football, JournoListically speaking.
The Post returned to its pre-GOP convention format, so
that a “Highlights” section again leads the daily email. This
permitted the lead stories of the day to be at the top, without
regard to subject matter, as had been the case until the format was
changed in advance of the Republican Convention.
The result? You guessed it. Candidate Obama’s speech and related
stories on the Democrats’ convention took the first three
places.
One week earlier, as I noted yesterday, Candidate Romney’s
speech was in place #11 in the headline list. Congratulations to
the Post editors, who have the courage of their
convictions. They are not only in the tank, but also in our face
about it.
Ray Hartwell, a Navy veteran and a Washington lawyer, is
reading daily headlines at assorted tavernas in Greece this
month.
Albert Constantine Jr.| 9.9.12 @ 9:42PM
This is one of those "dog bites man" pieces. Now, when the WaPo or other mainstream media outlets treat Republicans/conservatives/ Tea Party members with objectivity, that will be time to take note.
pet products | 9.9.12 @ 9:43PM
nice post!tks for you informative post.I'm really like it!
RJ| 9.10.12 @ 2:25AM
Thank-you.
While media prejudice is well known, each incident should be called out. Otherwise they get away with it and people follow their lead. I am always surprised at how many people simply accept whatever the mass media says regardless of how silly or inconsistent it is.
MikeBee| 9.10.12 @ 1:53PM
Ray,
What you mention the Post did has actually been standard practice in The Detroit Free Press for many years. In fact, there are some publications and media outlets in the U.S. which have been following the old Communist-Russian practice of never publishing anything that an anti-establishment writer pens. But if you speak with the journalists and their editors at these publications, they will be clueless of their propaganda.