If it’s true, as our rookie president alleges, that Mitt Romney
didn’t achieve his business success on his own but only partnered
with various government entities and functionaries in achieving his
great wealth. And if Dirty Harry’s murkily-sourced charges are true
that Romney failed to pay income taxes due over the past ten years.
Does this mean that the dedicated government school teacher in
Mitt’s past and the union cop on the beat near Mitt’s place of
business will have to be charged with income tax evasion along with
him? Hey, we do things together in the United States of Obama.
Don’t we?
Oldefarte| 8.9.12 @ 11:34AM
I'm wondering if the governmental welfare recipients should be somehow creditied with Mitt's financial success, say if they hadn't appied for food stamps, rental allowances, aid to dependent children, free public school meals for their children etc, would Mitt's success been attainable? After all, he must have depended upon these welfare recipients in some way, shape or form, huh????????
Mike in N.C.| 8.9.12 @ 3:25PM
Ridiculous argument that completely distorts what the President said. This post is a bad as the decontextualize commercial where Gilchrist, a recipient of much government largess, talks about building his business all by himself.