With regard to the comments from
Jim and
Quin on this matter, is anybody really surprised that Jonathan
Chait
would assert that Mitt Romney’s criticism of President Obama’s
infamous “You Didn’t Build That” remark is racist?
Let us not forget that it was Chait who in 2003 began an
article
with, “I hate President George W. Bush. There, I said it.” Of
course, if any conservative writer were to include a sentence which
read “I hate President Barack Obama,” Chait would be the first
amongst a legion of liberals to denounce the conservative writer in
question as racist.
As with many liberals, Chait does not approach conservatism and
its adherents rationally. He looks upon both conservatism and
conservatives with hatred in both his mind and heart. So when Chait
makes his latest charge we have to consider the source. With that
now let’s consider these two sentences:
Watch Obama’s delivery in the snippet put together by this
Republican ad. The key thing is that Obama is angry, and he’s
talking not in his normal voice but in a “black dialect.”
But it is President Obama who chose to be angry in that moment.
It is President Obama who chose not to talk, as Chait puts it, “in
his normal voice.” It is President Obama who chose to stray from
the teleprompter. No Republican made Obama do that. President Obama
is responsible for what he says and does. Thus President Obama has
only himself to blame for striking the wrong chord with the
American people during his speech in Roanoke, Virginia.
Now as long as there are liberal politicians and liberal writers
who insist any criticism of President Obama is an act of
racism, conservatives have an obligation to call them out on
it. We have an obligation to tell the Jonathan Chaits of the world
that they cheapen the meaning of racism and therefore cheapen
themselves. We also have an obligation to tell liberals that there
going to have to better than that. Because as long as Jonathan
Chait is considered a leading light amongst liberals, it tells you
how much the intellectual foundations of American liberalism have
flickered out.
BD57| 7.27.12 @ 5:54PM
"President Obama is responsible for what he says and does."
Racist. ;)
Dan Abrams| 7.27.12 @ 5:57PM
Chait is right about one thing. The tone of that speech is more damaging to Obama than the precise words. Nothing racial about it, though -- the anger in his voice betrays an dogma which is at odds with the way most Americans think.
Occam's Tool| 7.27.12 @ 7:30PM
The election should be won by Romney in a landslide, which is my prediction.
Bob Grant| 7.27.12 @ 9:54PM
Just another form of racial intimidation in the form of "analysis".
By "explaining" why racism (of the unconscious variety) is unavoidable vis-a-vis discussing Barack Obama, the first black president, he gets to set the ground rules on what crosses the line...which, by his logic, is everything out of the mouths of Caucasians.
The days - hopefully - of cowing people into thinking a certain way about race is over.
The cratering of our economy will do that. People have more important things on their mind than worrying about race, like economic survival.
Mr. cHAiTE, the kid gloves are off!!!
Bob K| 7.27.12 @ 11:26PM
Antle's blog on Chait-see below. No comments on it.
Hillyer's blog on Chait-see below. No comments on it.
Aaron's blog on Chait-here. 5 comments. 3rd time is a charm. Chait, whoever he is, will thank you for the publicity!
Bob S| 7.28.12 @ 1:51AM
Do we really have to post every time a liberal calls a conservative racist? This President has allowed unrestricted use of the race card. It's almost a joke now.
"Wow, Obama has raised the deficit more in his one term than all other presidents combined."
"RACIST"
Jack of Spades| 7.28.12 @ 11:40AM
Yes we do, even if the only response is "Chait [or whoever] is full of it!" Liberals will keep using this tactic as long as they think they can get away with it.
JimH| 7.28.12 @ 7:30AM
Are we allowed to assert that criticism of Romney is anti Mormon?
Ralphie| 7.28.12 @ 9:26AM
How does Chait define a "black dialect"? I read the remark before I heard Obama's speech, and I didn't like what I read without hearing his cadence. Did those who reported in writing change anything?
Tom Kyba| 7.28.12 @ 10:26AM
Since virtually all old moral tales that many learned as children are now considered to be every "ist" imaginable, Chait and his elementary school friends never heard the story of The Boy Who Cried Wolf.
JGW| 7.28.12 @ 10:54AM
As someone recently said: Racism to liberals is like catsup, you can put it on anything!
mike 3/505| 7.28.12 @ 3:27PM
+1
Oldefarte| 7.28.12 @ 11:56AM
Criticism of him is not racism but instead is simply what's known as TRUTH, and further truth will be revealed on 11/6/12 when he's defeated!!!!!!!!
Butch| 7.28.12 @ 3:29PM
Olde One, you have a way about you, sir. ALL political correctness is a war against the truth, or at least the truth being spoken. There is no other reason for it to exist. If rational argument and analysis could refute the truth, it would be used. Because it can't, they just try to pretend that it doesn't exist, and try to coerce you into doing the same.
spike59| 7.30.12 @ 5:53AM
Watch Obama's delivery in the snippet put together by this Republican ad. The key thing is that Obama is angry, and he's talking not in his normal voice but in a "black dialect."
---------------------------------------------------
is that 'black dialect' different than Harry Reid's famous 'Negro dialect?'
why, Mr Chait, that quote makes you sound...well, a bit racist...at least by your own standards