The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

1. Before storms rocked the D.C. region, there was the Obamacare ruling. There is a growing consensus in Washington, across the political spectrum, that John Roberts switched his vote in the health care case. The joint dissent by Anthony Kennedy, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Sam Alito reads like a majority opinion and refers repeatedly to Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s partial dissent/partial concurrence as “the dissent.” There have been reports that after Roberts switched sides, Kennedy led a campaign to try to win him back.

2. There are four reasons I don’t buy the conservative/libertarian defenses of Roberts even if I do think the ruling contains silver linings:

  • Kennedy voted with the conservatives, meaning that the reversal of the law rather than some concessions from the liberal justices was the best attainable outcome
  • The Medicaid penalty is thin gruel compared to the individual mandate and could cut both ways for federalism if it even has any impact at all
  • Roberts is writing for himself on the commerce clause and necessary and proper sections of his opinion; neither the liberal justices nor the conservative dissenters join, making the commerce clause limitations of little value as precedent
  • Even if regarded as precedent, it is hard to imagine what future expansion of government Roberts’ logic will enjoin that is worse than Obamacare.

3. We are already seeing that the Democrats are going back to the statute’s language and calling the individual mandate a penalty rather than the tax the ruling they embrace claims that it is. They even have a bit of a point, since the mandate is clearly a punishment rather than something designed to raise revenue. But the political value of this is limited: if the Democrats were to resist a Republican repeal attempt through reconciliation, it is hard to see where they would have a legal leg to stand on.

4. For Barack Obama, the tax language is the biggest political downside from the ruling. The Supreme Court has basically declared him a middle-class tax hiker.

5. For Mitt Romney, the biggest political downside is that it puts the focus back on the individual mandate. Obama and his media supporters are already making hay of Romney’s past for support for the mandate and its roots in Republican/conservative policy circles.

6. In non-health care news, last week was a good one for incumbents. Orrin Hatch easily survived his primary challenge. Charlie Rangel’s contest was more competitive, but he still won by a comfortable margin. New York will, however, avoid the shame of having a congressman whose Jew-baiting was sufficient to win him the endorsement of David Duke despite being a former Black Panther.

View all comments (6) |

Bob Grant| 7.1.12 @ 3:39PM

"We are already seeing that the Democrats are going back to the statute's language and calling the individual mandate a penalty rather than the tax the ruling they embrace claims that it is."

-----

And that is why politicians are the most despised people on earth. In their world, words are used to be manipulated and to manipulate.

And John Roberts enables, and makes legal, that behavior.

A pox on both houses!

Teflon93 | 7.1.12 @ 8:30PM

This is only the first betrayal. Next will be Mitt Romney's---but only if he succeeds in becoming President Etch-A-Sketch and has the opportunity to make his half-hearted non-attempt to repeal legislation he clearly favors.

You guys STILL don't get it. It isn't Republicans vs Democrats, or even conservatives vs liberals. It is Ruling Class vs Proles. We are the Proles.

C. Vernon Crisler | 7.2.12 @ 12:48AM

Ruling class vs. proles is just Marx-speak.

Teflon93 | 7.2.12 @ 9:02AM

No, it is reality. The Left is running the political and cultural institutions in this country and they clearly see themselves as the nomenklatura.

Their worldview is more Stalinist than Marxist and is not based on economic class but upon possession of the proper Ruling Class credentials.

This is why people who claim to be conservatives---people like Roberts---invariably tack strongly left.

Can you name a similar figure in government today who had impeccable Ruling Class credentials (Ivy League diploma, government jobs, politically correct) who has become a hard right standard-bearer on a major issue of our day?

We'll wait.

Mike Daly | 7.2.12 @ 12:07AM

The problem for Obama is he's becoming Bill Clinton - the more he campaigns, the more he helps cost the Democrats. Going after Romney over Romneycare would be a good tactic if it was a side that understands how the market works and understands that market solutions are the real solutions - Obama has neither on his side; attacking Romney comes out as just more timeless tosh from a President with a manifest record of economic and policy failure.

More Blog Posts by W. James Antle, III

http://spectator.org/blog/2012/07/01/weekend-political-wrap-up-obam

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

ADVERTISEMENT