Shouldn’t feminists be rushing to the side of Slate
columnist Emily Yoffe after she mustered up the courage to report
that the late Jesuit Fr. Robert Drinan
sexually assaulted her? As far as I can tell, few have. Perhaps
they are hesitating since Drinan, like the lunging Ted Kennedy,
“was right on the issues.” In 2007, Eleanor Smeal
eulogized Drinan in the pages of Ms. as a
“stalwart champion for women.” Smeal thanked him for supporting ERA
and abortion rights. From Bill Clinton to Ted Kennedy to John
Edwards to DSK to Fr. Drinan, proud
proponents of “women’s rights” have compiled a
voluminous record of allegedly degrading them. Perhaps
Drinan felt that Yoffe, as a beneficiary of
his “progressive” politics, owed him her submission.
He correctly assumed that Yoffe wouldn’t publicize the
incident. As she notes, she “admired” him and didn’t want
trouble. Drinan’s family is complaining about the
timing of Yoffe’s charge, but her desire not to dim the star
of a pro-abortion Jesuit useful to the
Dems partly explains it.
kingsmill| 6.22.12 @ 1:31PM
Apparently Drinan is the sole Catholic cleric who is, in the Left's eyes, immune from the charge: "sexual molester".
Occam's Tool| 6.22.12 @ 4:21PM
Scum bellows out to scum.
Tom Kyba| 6.24.12 @ 12:09PM
Just another example proving that feminism and NOW are about gaining political power and womens' issues are simply the bludgeon used to guilt-trip people into allowing these miscreants a say in public policy. They are "champagne" feminists.