The Department of Justice, in this case led by race-crusader
Thomas Perez, is suing
an Indiana-based egg producer for — wait for it — asking
non-citizens to provide more or different documentation proving
their eligibility to work than they ask of citizens.
The DOJ’s press
release does not claim that the company, Rose Acre Farms,
incorrectly identifies who is a citizen of the US and who is a
non-citizen, something they would jump on if they could reasonably
claim it.
Therefore, the complaint boils down to this: The DOJ is claiming
that it somehow comprises illegal discrimination for a company to
have different documentation standards for non-citizens than for
citizens. Perhaps it is also illegal discrimination to have
foreigners go into different passport lines when entering the
US.
Indeed, if it is discrimination to ask non-citizens for
particular documentation, is it not then discimination to require
non-citizens to acquire particular documentation prior to being
allowed to work?
More seriously, however, if it were illegal to require a
known non-citizen to produce particular, or more,
documentation than a citizen should produce, then based on the
DOJ’s standards, it would often be illegal to ask any person a
different question than you asked some other person if, for
example, both people were asking you for a job.
The DoJ action falls precisely in line with their efforts to
block Voter ID laws wherever possible and is part of their mission,
as perfectly highlighted by President Obama’s recent decision not
to enforce immigration law for illegal aliens who came here when
they were children, to functionally end most immigration law.
You may be tempted to think it is nothing more than a callous
attempt to garner Hispanic votes in the November election, but you
would be wrong. It is that, but it is more than that: Perez and his
boss, Eric Holder, and his boss, Barack Obama, are birds of a
feather, each of them believing that the United States must pay for
historical sins, and they plan to do it regardless of the damage to
the rule of law.