The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

So who would the Ron Paul supporters angry at Rand Paul for his Mitt Romney endorsement rather vote for? For the more conservative among them, a candidate is Constitution Party nominee Virgil Goode.

Goode may be the only politician to win election to Congress as a Democrat, independent, and Republican. At least one poll showed him with a chance of retaking his House seat as a Constitution Party candidate, but he declined to run.

His party changed, but Goode’s basic political allegiances—pro-life, pro-gun, and supportive of his constituents’ economic interests—seldom wavered. It is clear from talking to him that he considers immigration a paramount issue. “We need a moratorium on immigration,” he says, going beyond the border-security platitudes preferred by most of his congressional colleagues. “We can’t wait ten or even five years to do it. We need one right now.”

But his foreign policy record is closer to Romney’s than Paul’s. Consider:

He voted for the Iraq War and the Patriot Act. Unlike North Carolina Republican Rep. Walter Jones, in Congress he never budged from these positions. He subsequently voted to make the Patriot Act permanent. When Goode voted against a congressional resolution opposing the surge in Iraq, he said he didn’t want to “aid and assist the Islamic jihadists who want the green flag of the crescent and star to wave over the Capitol of the United States and over the White House of this country.” Goode warned of “In Muhammad we trust” appearing on U.S. currency….

The former congressman was harder to pin down on his past record, however. “I still believe to some degree that Iraq had WMD,” he confessed.

The Constitution Party has yet to win even 200,000 votes in a presidential election.

View all comments (7) |

Occam's Tool| 6.12.12 @ 11:19AM

Goode sounds like my kind of guy. Keep taxes low and oppose the sharia advocates. Put the machine guns on the border.

Derek Leaberry| 6.12.12 @ 12:41PM

In the 1970s there was born a baseball category called the Mendoza Line, named after shortstop Mario Mendoza who struggled mightily to hit .200. Ever since, the Mendoza Line has been a statement of batting futility. The modern political equivalent of the Mendoza Line might be the Buchanan Line, named after the 0.42 % crash and burn Reform campaign Pat waged in 2000. I was one of the 0.42 %, a vote I would still defend. Virgil Goode will probably be hard-pressed to top the Buchanan Line. The Paulites will vote for Libertarian Gary Johnson and perhaps Johnson will double the Buchanan Line. But I will vote for Goode.

Red Phillips | 6.12.12 @ 1:08PM

Goode is making progress on foreign policy. There is an interview at IndependentPoliticalReport(dot)com called “Virgil Goode Makes His Case to Ron Paul Supporters” that interested people should check out. I think that interview was done after the Antle interview. I would include a link but the filter didn’t like it.

pattymac| 6.12.12 @ 5:50PM

I'll vote for Gary Johnson. He's is a principled Libertarian, the only one who will carry the Revolution forward. Gary Johnson will change the political landscape. Check him out at www.GaryJohnson2012.com.

More Blog Posts by W. James Antle, III

http://spectator.org/blog/2012/06/12/goode-enough-for-paul-supporte

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

My Generation’s Disease

Benjamin Brophy | 5.17.13

The Liberal Union Behind the IRS

Jeffrey Lord | 5.16.13

Not Ready for Primetime Players

Daniel J. Flynn | 5.17.13

Assessing a Week of Scandal

Matt Purple | 5.17.13

Oops, Maybe Government is Tyrannical

Marta H. Mossburg | 5.17.13

The View From the Other Side

George H. Wittman | 5.17.13

From Bimbos to Benghazi

Jeffrey Lord | 5.9.13

ADVERTISEMENT