Mitt Romney today made a
surprise campaign appearance at Solyndra, the solar-panel
company that filed for bankruptcy after receiving half a billion
dollars in federal loan guarantees. Originally part of Romney’s
comeback to the Bain charges, it has emerged as a central part of
his critique of Barack Obama’s economic policy.
“It’s a symbol not of success but of failure,” Romney said at
the event. “I’m afraid the reason that the stimulus has been
unsuccessful, that the turnaround has taken so long to occur, that
the recovery has been tepid, is that the president fails to
understand the basic nature of free enterprise in America.”
Romney even hit Obama on crony capitalism:
I also note how damaging a decision like this is for free
enterprise generally. What you’re saying to other inventors, to
other entrepreneurs, particularly in the solar space, is that the
best way to get ahead is not with the best ideas and the best
technology and the best people and the best marketing, but instead
with the best lobbyists. That is not the nature of how America
works.
I wrote
about how Solyndra was representative of the Obama administration’s
broader approach to economics in the print edition. Recent national
and swing state polls
have shown Romney pulling even with Obama.
Occam's Tool| 5.31.12 @ 5:23PM
Don't have a job? Socialism Sucks!
(Mitt, you may use "Socialism Sucks" on T-shirts, etc. freely.) Vote for Mitt: Socialism Sucks!
Albert Constantine Jr.| 5.31.12 @ 8:30PM
Though it would definitely render the shirt/slogan unusable for campaign purposes, should such a shirt be designed, I would recommended the visage of Che that decorates so many fashionable pieces of casual wear be featured performing what was once termed as the unnatural act, though it would be difficult to get less than an NC-17 rating with that.
spike59| 6.1.12 @ 6:42AM
how about, "Sorry, ObaMao, but you've run out of other people's money"
Ryan| 6.1.12 @ 8:36AM
So....does Mitt believe bailing out companies, and allowing loopholes for specific companies, are free enterprise?
What about implicit or explicit government guarantees of loans?