The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

The Republican-controlled House voted to increase funding for corporate welfare through the Export-Import Bank. Only 93 members voted no.

View all comments (6) |

Dittohead| 5.9.12 @ 5:44PM

Me and El Rushbo are fine with corporate welfare, cause they make jobs, just don't give no damn welfare money to poor people.

Trinacria| 5.9.12 @ 5:56PM

Yes, quite; because as we all know, the poor are the real job creators. Why, without them there'd be virtually no need for social workers, prison guards, police, public defenders, liquor stores, pawn shops, Wal-Marts, fast food restaurants, MSNBC, GM, Chrysler, and professional race baiting rabble rousers.

Bro| 5.9.12 @ 8:50PM

No it doesn't. A corporation who gets government funded "welfare" has an unfair advantage over those companies that do not. It drives these companies out of business costing jobs and increasing prices (which also decreases jobs). Corporate Welfare is corrupt and I will NOT vote for a congressman who voted for it.

Indy| 5.9.12 @ 8:19PM

Many stories are not getting covered, what about the CIA Double Agent and all of the information we just handed to our enemy? Some things need to be kept quiet, we don't need to tell everyone how the CIA stopped an attack, people are now at risk.

Trinacria| 5.9.12 @ 8:52PM

Huh?

RJ| 5.9.12 @ 11:19PM

EXIM Bank has been on the target list for over 20 years and we still can't get rid of it. Most Congressmen vote for programs like this because its safer to please constituent groups rather than make them angry, but EXIM Bank is one of many non-governing programs that the federal government should get out of.

More Blog Posts by W. James Antle, III

http://spectator.org/blog/2012/05/09/and-while-we-were-talking-abou

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

ADVERTISEMENT