The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

The liberal Center for American Progress claims that Obamacare will save both seniors and taxpayers money. The group’s Think Progress site touts a new report by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) showing that taxpayers will save $200 billion and Medicare recipients $60 billion through 2016 courtesty of the Affordable Care Act.

Even this wouldn’t be much in the context of Medicare’s multi-trillion dollar shortfall. But if you read the fine print, Medicare’s chief actuary doesn’t think these projections are very realistic. Richard Foster pours the following cold water: “the financial projections shown in this report for Medicare do not represent a reasonable expectation for actual program operations in either the short range (as a result of the unsustainable reductions in physician payment rates) or the long range (because of the strong likelihood that the statutory reductions in price updates for most categories of Medicare provider services will not be viable).” Emphasis mine, hat tip Peter Suderman.

The reduction in physician payments isn’t going to happen, at least not to the extent envisioned by the federal health care law. And the assumptions about health care productivity improvements probably won’t pan out either, at least not to the extent necessary to make these projections realistic. It’s like the old joke about economists trying to rescue themselves from a pit: “First, assume a ladder.”

View all comments (4) |

Marvin E. Fox | 4.23.12 @ 5:15PM

Obamacare assumes there are enough people who will benefit from Obamacare that he will be a ble to prevail over the people who must pay for it. His problem is that socialism invariably removes the ability of the payers to make payments to the payees. Obama can't cure this by assuming a ladder; Obama needs to, at least, assume a helicopter!
Marvin E. Fox

TexasMom2012| 4.23.12 @ 6:32PM

The cuts Obamacare made to Medicare are as unrealistic as generating power from unicorn poop. The only way to make that viable is to cut care to seniors. Obama said it himself during the election when he told a woman whose mother had a pacemaker installed in her nineties, maybe she should have just gotten a pill... If Obama can't get tax dollars from you because you are retired then just take a pill while the care you have paid into all your life gets redistributed for Obama's social justice schemes. No recourse either because and unelected panel will decide what care you can have... Some animals will be more equal though because congress has exempted itself and the president himself from both Medicare and Obamacare and given themselves platinum care for life...

Nite| 4.23.12 @ 8:36PM

I like the way you think and agree with you.

More Blog Posts by W. James Antle, III

http://spectator.org/blog/2012/04/23/no-obamacare-probably-wont-imp

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

The IRS Immigration Fraud Scandal

Jeffrey Lord | 6.18.13

Foreign Policy as Farce

Jed Babbin | 6.17.13

The Biggest Fool of All

Doug Bandow | 6.17.13

Can Liturgical Music Be Saved?

Patrick O'Hannigan | 6.17.13

Revenge of the Fruitcakes

Peter Hitchens | 6.17.13

Obama's Climate of Intimidation

Matthew Sheffield | 6.18.13

Whither Suburbia?

Steven Greenhut | 6.18.13

The Mole in Don Draper

James Bowman | 6.17.13

ADVERTISEMENT