May 22, 2013 | 1 comment
May 22, 2013 | 2 comments
May 19, 2013 | 3 comments
May 19, 2013 | 1 comment
May 16, 2013 | 4 comments
Even I, with my low opinion of Thug-in-General Eric Holder, can’t believe he would lavish praise on scofflaw, tax evader, and murderous inciter to violence Al Sharpton in the way Holder did here.
Amazingly, Holder “ thanked CNN’s Rev. Sharpton ‘for your partnership, your friendship, and your tireless efforts to speak out for the voiceless, to stand up for the powerless, and to shine a light on the problems we must solve, and the promises we must fulfill.’”
Presumably he wasn’t talking about voiceless people like the late Anthony Graziosi, killed in Crown Heights after Sharpton’s rabble rousing. Presumably he wasn’t talking about the voiceless seven people who died at Freddie’s Fashion Mart. Presumably he wasn’t talking about Steven Pagones, fraudulently accused by Tawana Brawley and Al Sharpton.
Then again, maybe Holder agrees with Sharpton’s screeds against Jews and Mormons. Maybe Holder likes racial violence, which may be why he won’t do anything to sanction the New Black Panthers. Maybe Holderlikes racial demagoguery if it comes from black radicals like Sharpton.
Maybe Holder holds all those views himself. Maybe he sees racial and religious payback against innocents as being among the “promises we must fulfill.”
Maybe Holder is a moral degenerate.
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?