Former Attorney General Ed Meese saw this coming.
President Obama is now operating in tandem with the New York
Times and other sympathetic media outlets to delegitimize not
just the Supreme Court, but the Constitution itself. This effort
can be traced back to
a front page NYT hit piece authored by Adam Liptak
that ran on July 24, 2010. The article is built around a database
created by the National Science Foundation (NSF) that gauges the
ideological complexion of court rulings and the leanings of
individual members. “In the database, votes favoring criminal
defendants, unions, people claiming discrimination or violation of
their civil rights are, for instance, said to be liberal,” the
report explains. “Decisions striking down economic regulations and
favoring prosecutors, employers and the government are said to be
conservative.”
In a
subsequent piece that ran in February, Liptak targets the
Constitution itself.
“The Constitution has seen better days,” the article begins.
From here, Liptak goes on to describe how the Constitution is no
longer a compelling model for other countries. He even quotes
sitting U.S. Supreme Court Association Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
to drive the point home.
“I would not look to the United States Constitution if I were
drafting a constitution in the year 2012,” she said. As an
alternative, Ginsburg recommends looking to South Africa’s
constitution, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, or the
European Convention on Human Rights.
General Meese suspects the NYT reports are deliberately
timed with White House actions.
“What he [Obama] is really doing is leading an effort to
undermine the Constitution as the primary document which forms the
basic principles of our government and the structure that should be
followed by the executive branches as well as the other two
branches,” Meese explained during a talk at this year’s
Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC).
Mark Wohlschlegel, a staff attorney with Americans for Limited
Government (ALG), challenged Justice Ginsburg’s view of the
Constitution
in a recent report.
The Constitution “is not a document designed to empower the
government to protect its people, but rather one that was designed
to protects its people from their government,” he wrote.
It is now apparent that Team Obama views not just the Supreme
Court, but the Constitution itself as an obstacle.