The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Et Tu, Jim Antle?

Good Lord, a raging epidemic of Romneyitis has broken out here, eh?

Look, Jim: i did not make a “complaint” about Mitt’s money advantage, I merely pointed out that Romney is winning by methods which, when viewed in perspective, make his campaign’s claims to overwhelming superiority look much less impressive than they appear at first glance. He wins Michigan, his home state, by 3 points and wins Ohio by 1 point and, on the basis of such narrow victories purchased at such a high price, Mitt’s a world-beater? Give me a freaking break.

If Romney’s nomination is as “inevitable” as his advocates wish us to believe, why the panicky demands for Rick Santorum to quit now, and the urgent pleas for conservatives to rally now to the Romney banner? Does it not occur to you that maybe Team Mitt saw that Louisiana shift to Santorum — his 3-to-1 margin over Newt Gingrich helping produce a 22-point win over Romney — as a significant development? Could it be that those Romney surrogates who are most loudly shouting “inevitable” now are much less confident than they would like us to believe?

Let’s wait and see what happens a week from Tuesday. The Santorum supporters I’ve talked to don’t seem inclined to quit now, and these “Rally ‘Round the Romney” cries might inspire them to fight twice as hard. They’ve got a volunteer phone-from-home program that has helped Santorum out-perform the polls, and even out-perform his staff’s own expectactions.

One top Santorum aide told me last week that they actually thought Romney would win Mississippi, but there was a late surge for Santorum no one had predicted. Was it those phone-from-home volunteers who did the trick? I don’t know, and I don’t know if Santorum can pull off another miracle or two next week. However, it’s not a possibility I can dismiss, either.

Three weeks ago, one of Mitt’s top strategists said it would take “an act of God” for Romney to lose the nomination. So if Mitt loses …

Well, I don’t know. Let’s wait and see.

topics:
Presidential Race 2012

View all comments (10) |

The Underground Conservative | 3.26.12 @ 4:03PM

Good Lord: Etch-A-Sketch vs. President Downgrade. And people wonder why I may vote for Gary Johnson in November?

SpiralArchitect| 3.26.12 @ 4:59PM

Nope. I never questioned why you would vote for G Johnson.

Al Adab| 3.26.12 @ 4:45PM

All because Romney won a GOP primary in a state, IL, which will never deliver an electoral vote to any GOP nominee. I'm sorry that the republicans in IL are disenfranchised by being so outnumbered by the dead in Cook County, but such is IL.

To select our nominee because they might be "competitive" in blue states is an exercise in futility. It does not matter if the GOP loses any state by 2% or by 15% in November. The states in play are the ones on which we must concentrate.There is a huge disconnect between the Primary process and the general election. States like NY, NJ, CA and so one will not deliver electoral votes in November, why should they decide the nominee?

mjs_pa| 3.26.12 @ 4:49PM

The more I'm told to quit....the harder I fight. This is the spirit that separates Americans from any other. It also separates patriots from the Washington establishment. Santorum said "bull shit" to lies yesterday. I say "TO HELL" to all who would shove obama-lite down my throats.

If the establishment thinks they can win in the fall with 60 or 70% of the party, they are crazy!

Anommynous| 3.26.12 @ 4:54PM

If Rick Santorum were no longer a threat, why does Drudge continue to dedicate his headlines to taking him down?

Maybe, at the end of it, Mitt will manage to scrape together a narrow majority of delegates with a plurality of votes (and a hand-delivered victory in Virginia, where he could not keep the mighty Ron Paul below 40% in a head-to-head matchup).

It's a very expensive plurality, indeed. Why can't the inevitable candidate manage a majority when outspending his opponents by such margins?

SpiralArchitect| 3.26.12 @ 5:00PM

This conversation, via blog posts, seems more suited for a few emails. :/

corvair| 3.26.12 @ 5:40PM

I guess the Dems voting for Santorum in Michigan and Ohio, and the uncounted precincts in Iowa didn't make any difference in the results.

Windy City Commentary| 3.26.12 @ 6:31PM

Romney had to outspend his opponents by huge margins in order to win Florida, Michigan, Ohio, and Illinois. If he didn't carpet bomb Gingrich and Santorum in those States, he would not have won them, and Santorum would be on his way to the nomination.

When Mitt's money can pick the Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, polarize it, he has been able to sway enough uninformed Republican voters to vote for him and make him the winner.

Clint| 3.26.12 @ 7:49PM

Follow The Money Trail.

Romney's Crony Donors:

Goldman Sachs $535,680
JPMorgan Chase & Co $375,650
Morgan Stanley $323,800
Credit Suisse Group $299,160
Citigroup Inc $282,765
Bank of America $277,850
Kirkland & Ellis $222,702
Barclays $221,650
PricewaterhouseCoopers $191,500
HIG Capital $188,500
Blackstone Group $178,800
Wells Fargo $163,200
UBS AG $156,550
Bain Capital $154,000
EMC Corp $128,300
Citadel Investment Group $122,125
Elliott Management $121,000
Bain & Co $113,300
Sullivan & Cromwell $107,150
The Villages $97,500

The Tea Party Rebellion Heads To An Open Convention.

aware| 3.26.12 @ 7:56PM

I'm shocked to find bankers buying politicians. You'd think having control of the Central Bank and Treasury would have satisfied them.

Related Blog Posts

More Blog Posts by Robert Stacy McCain

http://spectator.org/blog/2012/03/26/et-tu-jim-antle

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

My Generation’s Disease

Benjamin Brophy | 5.17.13

The Liberal Union Behind the IRS

Jeffrey Lord | 5.16.13

Not Ready for Primetime Players

Daniel J. Flynn | 5.17.13

Assessing a Week of Scandal

Matt Purple | 5.17.13

Oops, Maybe Government is Tyrannical

Marta H. Mossburg | 5.17.13

The View From the Other Side

George H. Wittman | 5.17.13

From Bimbos to Benghazi

Jeffrey Lord | 5.9.13

USPS: Radical Surgery Needed

Peter Hannaford | 5.17.13

ADVERTISEMENT