Today marks the beginning of a full court press by Paul Ryan on
behalf of the fiscal 2013 House Republican budget proposal:
multiple television appearances, a Capitol Hill press conference, a
Wall Street Journal op-ed, and a speech at the American
Enterprise Institute. Last year’s budget faced a vicious Democratic
onslaught, including allegations that the plan ended Medicare and
an ad showing Ryan pushing an old lady in a wheelchair off a
cliff.
This year’s budget preserves the option of traditional Medicare
while transitioning away from single payer to premium support for
competitive private insurance plans. It repeals — but doesn’t yet
replace — Obamacare. It streamlines the tax code, closing
loopholes and replacing the existing tax brackets with two low
rates of 10 and 25 percent. It shifts toward a “territorial” tax
system on business profits earned abroad. It lowers the top
corporate tax rate, currently among the highest in the
industrialized world. The budget also privatizes Fannie and
Freddie.
The bottom line is that the Ryan budget would reduce deficits
from 2013 to 2022 by $3.26 trillion relative to President Obama’s
budget proposal (the Senate Democrats’ budget hasn’t existed in
1,056 days), according to the Congressional Budget Office. Spending
would be $5.3 trillion less and $2 trillion in tax increases would
be averted. Public debt will be $1 trillion lower by 2021. By 2050,
the debt’s share of the economy could be as low as 10 percent — a
far different path than the current trajectory.
One sticking point: the plan adds $240 billion to deficits over
the next decade when compared to the CBO baseline. That baseline
assumes things that neither party will allow to happen — the full
expiration of the Bush tax cuts and reductions in Medicare payments
— so it is not terribly realistic. Yet it will emerge not only as
a Democratic argument against the Ryan tax cuts but as a point of
contention among some congressional conservatives — like the
supporters of the
Senate Tea Party budget — who want immediate deficit reduction
and even deeper spending cuts.
C Bowen | 3.20.12 @ 12:15PM
It's hard to take TARP Ryan seriously when the budget still goes up this year.
What is it about these hacks that they don't understand spending less than the year prior in this alleged time of austerity?
PattyMor| 3.20.12 @ 12:52PM
Its a start, but more needs to be done. Privatizing Fannie & Freddie is good, but assurances are there that there isn't back door guarantees? I'd rather they just killed the two agencies and make banks keep the loans on their books. What better discipline is there than have to eat your own loan losses?
C Bowen| 3.20.12 @ 1:19PM
The Ryan plan doesn't balance the budget until 2040--why are we still talking about this put up job?
Senator Rand Paul just released a plan to balance the budget in five years by closing down entire Departments that would not impact anyone but the employees of said departments--that is both smarter politics, and it may actually balance the budget before 2040.
Please get Ryan off the stage--in the event a Republican does become President this cycle, the last thing we need is Paul TARP Ryan being presented in the MSM a serious economic conservative, leading the charge to balance the budget by 2040.