The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Today marks the beginning of a full court press by Paul Ryan on behalf of the fiscal 2013 House Republican budget proposal: multiple television appearances, a Capitol Hill press conference, a Wall Street Journal op-ed, and a speech at the American Enterprise Institute. Last year’s budget faced a vicious Democratic onslaught, including allegations that the plan ended Medicare and an ad showing Ryan pushing an old lady in a wheelchair off a cliff.

This year’s budget preserves the option of traditional Medicare while transitioning away from single payer to premium support for competitive private insurance plans. It repeals — but doesn’t yet replace — Obamacare. It streamlines the tax code, closing loopholes and replacing the existing tax brackets with two low rates of 10 and 25 percent. It shifts toward a “territorial” tax system on business profits earned abroad. It lowers the top corporate tax rate, currently among the highest in the industrialized world. The budget also privatizes Fannie and Freddie.

The bottom line is that the Ryan budget would reduce deficits from 2013 to 2022 by $3.26 trillion relative to President Obama’s budget proposal (the Senate Democrats’ budget hasn’t existed in 1,056 days), according to the Congressional Budget Office. Spending would be $5.3 trillion less and $2 trillion in tax increases would be averted. Public debt will be $1 trillion lower by 2021. By 2050, the debt’s share of the economy could be as low as 10 percent — a far different path than the current trajectory.

One sticking point: the plan adds $240 billion to deficits over the next decade when compared to the CBO baseline. That baseline assumes things that neither party will allow to happen — the full expiration of the Bush tax cuts and reductions in Medicare payments — so it is not terribly realistic. Yet it will emerge not only as a Democratic argument against the Ryan tax cuts but as a point of contention among some congressional conservatives — like the supporters of the Senate Tea Party budget — who want immediate deficit reduction and even deeper spending cuts.

View all comments (3) |

C Bowen | 3.20.12 @ 12:15PM

It's hard to take TARP Ryan seriously when the budget still goes up this year.

What is it about these hacks that they don't understand spending less than the year prior in this alleged time of austerity?

PattyMor| 3.20.12 @ 12:52PM

Its a start, but more needs to be done. Privatizing Fannie & Freddie is good, but assurances are there that there isn't back door guarantees? I'd rather they just killed the two agencies and make banks keep the loans on their books. What better discipline is there than have to eat your own loan losses?

C Bowen| 3.20.12 @ 1:19PM

The Ryan plan doesn't balance the budget until 2040--why are we still talking about this put up job?

Senator Rand Paul just released a plan to balance the budget in five years by closing down entire Departments that would not impact anyone but the employees of said departments--that is both smarter politics, and it may actually balance the budget before 2040.

Please get Ryan off the stage--in the event a Republican does become President this cycle, the last thing we need is Paul TARP Ryan being presented in the MSM a serious economic conservative, leading the charge to balance the budget by 2040.

More Blog Posts by W. James Antle, III

http://spectator.org/blog/2012/03/20/paul-ryan-and-the-budget-wars

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

The IRS Immigration Fraud Scandal

Jeffrey Lord | 6.18.13

Foreign Policy as Farce

Jed Babbin | 6.17.13

The Biggest Fool of All

Doug Bandow | 6.17.13

Can Liturgical Music Be Saved?

Patrick O'Hannigan | 6.17.13

Revenge of the Fruitcakes

Peter Hitchens | 6.17.13

Obama's Climate of Intimidation

Matthew Sheffield | 6.18.13

Obama's Unaffordable Act

Peter Ferrara | 6.19.13

Whither Suburbia?

Steven Greenhut | 6.18.13

ADVERTISEMENT