Thank you
Aaron… Nice comments and good catch. The Media Research
Center was presenting it as new, and Breitbart.com is
attacking Buzzfeed for scooping and “selectively editing” the
video.
Prof. Derrick Bell is a radical academic tied to Jeremiah Wright
and is being honored in the video. The more controversial portions
of the tape will be aired tonight on The Sean Hannity TV show.
This is the
2nd time in a month ex-Politico Ben Smith at Buzzfeed has been
accused of using selectively edited material as a scoop. It also
appears this is one of the tapes Andrew Breitbart promised to
release.
Indy| 3.7.12 @ 3:42PM
From Rightscoop
"Breitbart.com Editor-in-Chief Joel Pollak and Editor-at-Large Ben Shapiro will appear on The Sean Hannity Show to discuss the tape. The full tape will be released tonight on Fox News’ Hannity..."
and "I published what I had from a 1991 broadcast and I didn’t selectively edit anything."
http://www.therightscoop.com/b.....y-tonight/
I don't watch Hannity, the bloggers will definitely be busy at work posting whatever we learn. I must thank those who take the time to post the things we do not watch, thank goodness for the internet!
ltw| 3.7.12 @ 5:03PM
http://video.pbs.org/video/1082086783/
similar footage included in this 2009 PBS frontline program (Chapter 3 of 6). The editing though in this PBS program breaks around commentary at the point I was interested about in the BuzzFeed released tape at (1:08-1:09) where audio is cut and then comes disjointedly back up for the last 7 or so seconds. So, I'm interested in Breitbarts team filling in the blanks with better source material if they have it. I was surprised BuzzFeed didn't hear the obvious problem in the video they released. Big oversight on BuzzFeeds part that they didn't commnet on it when they released it. So the Bigs still scooped the story that the tape appears selectively edited by someone. I bet they have more.
Simon Templar| 3.7.12 @ 5:09PM
Maybe you could try reporting the whole story with some details.
If Smith says he has not edited anything, then what this about Hannity showing the edited stuff and more of the tape?Why release this only on Hannity? Is Hannity working this story with the Breitbart people? Why release anything until the whole thing is obtained or there is something actually worth seeing?
What the hell is the LA Times, a news outlet, doing with stuff that they refuse to let the public see under lock and key? Can they be sued to release them? Do they own these tapes like a copyright or something and why is ther only one copy?
ltw| 3.7.12 @ 5:09PM
You should look back at Breitbart reporting. They do not appear to me to be accusing BuzzFeed of selectively editing, they are saying BuzzFeed / Ben Smith released a selectively edited tape...selectively edited by someone.
RJ| 3.7.12 @ 5:12PM
Here is the text of the Obama video I would like to see: "To the American public: I am not qualified to serve in government in any capacity and have embarrassed the country. I hereby resign from the office of the Presidency effective immediately. Send my government pension payments to my account in the Cayman Islands where I am taking up residency. Don't expect me to pay any of your taxes either."
Stan Redmond| 3.7.12 @ 6:03PM
I like the entire theme of Obama's speech.
"Judge by the color of the skin and not the content of character, or qualifications."
Clint| 3.7.12 @ 6:09PM
We are In A Media War.
The Liberal Mainstream Media Fix Is In For Obama And It's Up To The Alternative Media To Expose Both Obama And His Liberal Flacks In The Mainstream Media.
WL| 3.7.12 @ 11:53PM
Thanks for telling us....
Where have you been for the last Five thousand years?
Did someone have your ignorant ass in a Cryogenic freeze with Hans Solo or something???
Don't get excited either...HS is a Star Wars character...not a new Jew Hating Nazi that you can read about and admire...
Tell Mahmood I said hello....and Bibi will send him a couple of gag gifts shortly.
WL| 3.7.12 @ 11:55PM
Hey everyone...I have some more NEW information to second Clints big announcement about the media...
Barack Obama is a DEMOCRAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Extra Extra Read all about it.//....
Clint| 3.8.12 @ 12:39AM
Uh Oh !
Screwball Israel Firster Smear Bund Bibi Boy,Wl Is All Cranky & PMS'y Again.
Was It Somethin' I Said About Your Roughy Puff Mancrush Bibi Tryin' To Get Our American Warriors To Do Israel's Fightin' For Them Once Again, This Time In Iran, Sugar Pockets ?
MaybeYour Honey, Bibi Could Get A Note From His Mommy, Sweetie Pie.
The American Hitman| 3.7.12 @ 10:39PM
Prof. Derrick Bell is
WAS
Oldefarte| 3.7.12 @ 11:35PM
The one and only hope for this nation is if this information finally sees the light of day BEFORE NOVEMBER!!!!!!!!!
WL| 3.8.12 @ 12:00AM
Sorry folks, but this video isn't going to do anything....as much as I would hope it would...
The only video that will do anything to threaten this President's re-election...is a video capturing him saything that all of the free stuff he talks about giving out is not actually coming...
For Instance...this HHS mandate crap has women approving of the Dear Leader in overwhelming numbers right now (at least pretty high)...
WHY?
No, it's not because they believe the medias narrative about our "war on women." not most of them at least...
ITS THE FREE STUFF...they want that crap for FREE and don't give a darn about what it means for the country.
No, I am not just picking on women. 90% of women AND men are ignorant freebie loving shmucks.
WL| 3.8.12 @ 12:08AM
You people have to know what I am talking about too...most of you are very intelligent, or you wouldn't be here. (Clint's spaceship just happened to kick his nasty butt out above a computer lab that was used by a conservative before he slithered in..)
I bet we all have tried to engage some unwitting moron about the issues we are facing...only to stop and realize that you are talking to an absolute crap for brains ingnorant fool....that can't comprehend a word you are saying....
For example: you say something like..."can you believe that Obama is trying to tell the Catholics that they HAVE to pay for contraception etc."
...and they start talking about how much contraception costs....or what type of contraception is acceptable to cover...
As you mourn for your country.
Clint| 3.8.12 @ 12:46AM
Apparently, Israel Firster Smear Bund Woo Girl, WL Is Havin' Another Hissy Fit Because Tea Party Patriot Clint Laughed At His Girlfriend, Bibi.
That's Too Bad, Israel Firster Crybaby,WL.
http://www.grimmemennesker.dk/.....people.jpg
Isreal Firster Smear Bund WL| 3.8.12 @ 1:28AM
I'll make you a bet Clint....and I'm not posting anymore...
Since you always seem to ignore the fact that you are actually posting this mess from Mahmoud's private suite...and you love to bash Bibi (a real combat leader, who is doing his best to protect his people)...
If Bibi launches as devastating strike against the Iranian nuclear facilities without our involvement....instead of "Clint"....you have to sign your posts as "Clint aka Bibi Pimped My Daddy" for a whole week starting the day after the bombs drop...
If the US attacks FOR ISREAL as you say always happens...I'll post my comments as "Bibi Is My Mancrush, WL"....
IF, neither happens...then the bet is a push...
SO, Clint?
Do we have a bet?
Clint| 3.8.12 @ 2:15AM
Good.
Now, You Can Move To Israel, Roughy Puff Armchair Commando, WL.
" The Region: Israel isn't about to hit Iran: Get used to it!
Does Iran have such deliverable weapons now? No. If Israel attacks Iran now does that mean Iran would never get nuclear weapons? No, it would merely postpone that outcome for at most a year or two. If Israel attacks Iranian nuclear installations would that ensure future peace between the two countries? Would it make it less likely that the Tehran regime uses such weapons to strike at Israel in future? No.
On the contrary, it would have the exact opposite effect. It would ensure direct warfare between the two countries and make Iran’s use of nuclear weapons against Israel 100 percent probable. If Israel attacks Iran would it have backing from anyone else in the world? No, in fact the United States strongly opposes such an operation. Launching such an attack would ensure a level of international isolation for Israel far higher than what exists today.
Would such an attack by Israel be likely to succeed even in doing maximum damage to Iranian facilities? No, a great deal could go wrong. Planes could get lost or crash or have to turn back. Planes arriving over the targets could miss, or accidentally drop their bombs on civilians, or simply not do much damage. In military operations – especially against multiple hardened targets at the planes’ maximum range – a lot can go wrong.
So given all of these factors why should Israel possibly attack Iran? It is an absurd idea."
http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/C.....?id=255651
Ryan| 3.8.12 @ 9:18AM
It's an absurd idea to attack someone who is promoting and sponsoring genocide against you?