May 22, 2013 | 3 comments
May 22, 2013 | 2 comments
May 19, 2013 | 3 comments
May 19, 2013 | 1 comment
May 16, 2013 | 4 comments
Here’s the story. Chuck Todd, neutral observer that he is, Tweeted that it seems highly suspicious. Dan Gainor Tweets that the Romneyites look like “a bunch of crooks.” Matt Lewis: “seems sketchy.” Ohio Sec of State and former US Sen Mike DeWine, now for Santorum, formerly committed to Romney, sasys Romney team “will do anything and say anything,” and blasts the move.
A former Michigan state AG WHO SUPPORTS ROMNEY, Mike Cox, also blasts the stealing of the delegate…. Gen’l COunsel of Mich GOP who actually writes the rules also opposed the theft…..
If Romney team has ANY integrity, AND any PR sense, they will ask the Mich Party to recant and go back to the former understanding. A single delegate isn’t worth dirty pool like this, and isn’t worth the PR black eye that should attach to those who use such strong-arm, insider tactics…..
Dave Weigel jokes that we should call this scandal “Dele-Gate.” Great line!
Santorum team says it has already sent a document to the RNC protesting this change….
“We think this speaks more to the [unfairness of] the actions themselves than to the delegate itself,” says a Santorum guy (a Sec of State, although I’m not sure from which state)…..
…. MORE LATER
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
H/T to National Review Online