The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Tomorrow the Senate is expected to vote on the Blunt-Nelson Conscience Protection Amendment, a bipartisan measure that would protect religious institutions from the HHS contraceptive mandate. The amendment reads:

Nothing in this title (or any amendment made by this title) shall be construed to require an individual or institutional health care provider, or authorize a health plan to require a provider, to provide, participate in, or refer for a specific item or service contrary to the provider’s religious beliefs or moral convictions.

The language would also protect religious employers from being coerced into providing abortion coverage. Democrats who support the president’s mandate are likely to paint Blunt-Nelson as a ban on contraception, which it manifestly is not. It is also worth noting that Hillarycare, that notorious piece of theocratic legislation from the 1990s, contained a similar religious exemption (hat tip: John McCormack).

View all comments (1) |

ajb| 2.29.12 @ 1:03PM

The State of Geogia with its Republican Governor, Senate, and House, has a contraceptive mandate like that proposed by the Obama administration. Why? Why haven't they repealed it? Why do they hate religion in Georgia?

The State of New York has contraceptive mandate, too. The Catholic Church challenged it in court and took it all the way to the Supreme Court. The Court, with John Roberts and Samuel Alito, refused to hear their case. Why? Why does the Supreme Court hate Religion?

More Blog Posts by W. James Antle, III

http://spectator.org/blog/2012/02/29/senate-nearing-vote-on-conscie

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Immigration Bill Clears Key Committee

Jordan Gonzalez | 11:56AM

Nixonian

Yogi Love | 11:54AM

Moore, OK by Steve Breen

Patrick Ryan | 11:50AM

He’s Just Not That Into You

Ross Kaminsky | 11:34AM

Issa’s Mistake

Ross Kaminsky | 11:11AM

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

ADVERTISEMENT