Tomorrow the Senate is expected to vote on the Blunt-Nelson
Conscience Protection Amendment, a bipartisan measure that would
protect religious institutions from the HHS contraceptive mandate.
The amendment reads:
Nothing in this title (or any amendment made by this title)
shall be construed to require an individual or institutional health
care provider, or authorize a health plan to require a provider, to
provide, participate in, or refer for a specific item or service
contrary to the provider’s religious beliefs or moral
convictions.
The language would also protect religious employers from being
coerced into providing abortion coverage. Democrats who support the
president’s mandate are likely to paint Blunt-Nelson as a ban on
contraception, which it manifestly is not. It is also worth noting
that Hillarycare, that notorious piece of theocratic legislation
from the 1990s, contained a similar
religious exemption (hat tip:
John McCormack).
ajb| 2.29.12 @ 1:03PM
The State of Geogia with its Republican Governor, Senate, and House, has a contraceptive mandate like that proposed by the Obama administration. Why? Why haven't they repealed it? Why do they hate religion in Georgia?
The State of New York has contraceptive mandate, too. The Catholic Church challenged it in court and took it all the way to the Supreme Court. The Court, with John Roberts and Samuel Alito, refused to hear their case. Why? Why does the Supreme Court hate Religion?