The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Mark Hemingway of The Weekly Standard draws our attention to this exchange yesterday between ABC White House correspondent Jake Tapper and White House Press Secretary Jay Carney. Tapper asked Carney if he agreed with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid that the Senate did not need to pass a budget or if he agreed with Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke that the Senate not passing a budget has created uncertainty and affected growth:

Tapper: So therefore, the Senate should pass a budget as well.

Carney: I don’t have a —

Tapper: I’m asking.

Carney: Well, I don’t have an opinion to express on how the Senate does its business with regards to this issue. The fact is because of the negotiations over the debt ceiling that resulted in the Budget Control Act, we have an unusual situation here in that the top lines for the budget going forward have already been set and agreed to by Republicans and Democrats alike.

Tapper: So the — I’m not actually asking your opinion, but the White House’s opinion, because it’s the White House’s —

Carney: Well, I mean, I don’t have a —

Tapper: The White House has no opinion about whether or not the Senate should pass a budget? The president’s going to introduce one. The Fed chair says not having one is bad for growth. But the White House has no opinion about whether —

Carney: I have no opinion — the White House has no opinion on Chairman Bernanke’s assessment of how the Senate ought to do its business.

So there you have it. The Obama Administration does not have an opinion on how the Democrat controlled Senate “does its business with regards to this issue.” Is it any wonder that the aforementioned Democrat controlled Senate has not passed a budget in 1,016 days and counting? If the Senate were in Republican hands and had not passed a budget in over a 1,000 days, I doubt Mr. Carney would reply in such a sanguine manner. I dare say Mr. Carney would accuse Senate Republicans of being “obstructionist” as he has done repeatedly with House Republicans.

Only in Obamaland can an elected body not pass a budget in over 1,000 days with its leader proclaiming that a budget need not be passed and it be deemed progress. Whoever Republicans nominate to run against President Obama should be point out the Democrat controlled Senate’s inaction whenever President Obama accuses House Republicans of obstructionism.

View all comments (10) |

Bill| 2.9.12 @ 2:48PM

Harry Reid is a "Son of a Whore." That's why Senate failed to pass a budget in 1016 days. Shame on!

Oldefarte| 2.9.12 @ 3:00PM

The Senate canNOT pass a budget simply because it is controlled majoratively by Democrats [who refule to decrease governmental spending]. Senate Democrats obcession with revenue increases [aka tax hikes] prevents same, and they are so due to their singular agenda of providing more and more forms of government welfare to its constituents in return for their votes for Democrats at election time. Once again, IT'S THE DEMOCRATS STUPIDS!!!!!!!!!!

Bill Hussein O'Stalin| 2.9.12 @ 4:36PM

Without a budget you can spend without care. There will be consequence but the liberals don't care.

SpiralArchitect| 2.9.12 @ 4:54PM

The white house doesn't care/budget...

This was not obvious to who 1600+ days ago??

SpiralArchitect| 2.9.12 @ 4:55PM

My frustration added a 1 to the figure.

I will leave it there as we will certainly hit 1600 days...

PCC| 2.9.12 @ 6:55PM

The definition of the word "sanguine" is: "cheerfully optimistic; ruddy; robust."

That hardly sounds like Jay Carney, no matter the subject.

Bob K.| 2.9.12 @ 7:24PM

It can also mean "bloodthirsty." Which fits the Democrats approach to taxing the citizenry.

martin j smith| 2.10.12 @ 7:36AM

This illustrates exactly why Obama must be defeated and a Candidate that resonates the big discontent in the country. Romney and Paul do not care. Newt I think has his uses against Romney but is otherwise in LaLa Land. Santorum appears to be the man for now.

Nancy in NC| 2.10.12 @ 8:10AM

If you don't have a budget, then no one can say "that's not in the budget".

If Obama is reelected (God forbid) does anyone have a guess what the debt will be at the end of that four years? Will anyone care?

HH| 2.11.12 @ 5:19PM

Nancy, I am with you. We will hit $16 Trillion in debt by 1 September 2012.

And that is the "official number." No telling what the true accrued debt of the nation is.

What these U.S. Senators are doing is DODGING all responsibility.

My two are Demoncrats; I wish we could give them one-way tickets to Somalia.

More Blog Posts by Aaron Goldstein

http://spectator.org/blog/2012/02/09/obama-wh-doesnt-care-if-the-se

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

ADVERTISEMENT