The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Remember those “shadowy groups” the president said were infiltrating our democracy? The political action committees created by the Supreme Court decision liberals love to hate, Citizens United? The ones that can take bottomless contributions from the 1 percent?

Well, Barack Obama’s campaign will use super PACs. CNN reports “that senior campaign and administration officials who participate at fundraising events for the president’s campaign will also appear at events for Priorities USA Action, the PAC supporting Obama.” Naturally, they blame the success of Republican super PACs for this decision, saying they will not “unilaterally disarm.”

Unilaterally disarm? This is a campaign that once talked about raising $1 billion on its own and, failing that, has raised more money than all the Republican candidates combined. At the end of December, Obama had four times as much cash on hand as Mitt Romney. Super PACs are the only thing keeping it even. Now, I don’t object to the president’s supporters having super PACs. But give me a break.

View all comments (1) |

PattyMor| 2.7.12 @ 3:07PM

Just think about all that money that George Soros, Warren Buffoon, and Bill Gates can dump in it. Now that's what I'd call a super duper PAC.

More Blog Posts by W. James Antle, III

http://spectator.org/blog/2012/02/07/obama-flip-flops-on-super-pacs

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

ADVERTISEMENT