As I wrote
here shortly after it aired on Sunday night, I really liked the
Clint Eastwood Chrysler
Super Bowl ad and said it was the only ad worth
remembering.
Well, it may very well be the most remembered Super Bowl ad of
all time. However, a lot of conservatives weren’t so receptive.
Karl Rove was
“offended” by the ad. Over at NRO, Christian
Schneider claimed
the ad was nothing more than “a few vacuous bromides,
masquerading as profundity” and for good measure reminded everyone
that Eastwood had fathered five children with seven different
women. Geoffery Norman at The Weekly Standard was a little
more tactful
but no less direct. “The ad was about politics, not cars,”
writes Norman, “and it was an endorsement of bailouts, not hard
work and grit.”
For his part, the 81-year old actor and director
insists he is not affiliated with President Obama.
I think conservatives are not only shooting the messenger but
they don’t get the message.
I never took the ad as an endorsement of President Obama. Rather
I took it as a tribute to America’s resilience and can do spirit. I
particularly liked the line, “We find a way through tough times and
if we can’t find a way, we’ll make one.”
Frankly, the only reason that Karl Rove is “offended” is
because he wished he had put out an ad like that. That ad said more
in two minutes than not only what the Republican candidates have
had to say in the past six months but also more than what President
Obama has had to say in three years in office. But if Rove and
other conservatives are going throw a fit over this then the Obama
Administration would be foolish not to embrace this commercial.
As for Eastwood, he sounds positively Reaganesque. But I
wouldn’t expect less from a man who understands not only the medium
of film and television but the meaning of words especially when
used sparsely. If Mitt Romney had narrated these lines, they would
have gone in one ear and out the other.
Not all conservatives are attacking Eastwood. Here’s a defense of
Eastwood by Mark Levin.