Remember when I was
reporting on, and pushing
a discussion of, a movement to draft
Bobby Jindal or Paul Ryan? Well, Jim Geraghty has
almost the entire story here, one I could not ethically report
at the time. The long and short of it was that serious people were
considering a write-in effort in New Hampshire. It has worked
before. It, or a version of it, came closer than anyone knew. Of
course, it would have eventually required the cooperation of
reluctant non-candidates, but, hey, that’s what “draft” movements
are all about: convincing reluctant non-candidates to become
candidates after all.
Now this was before many people were accepting the idea that
Rick Santorum actually had a real shot to move into the top tier of
candidates. It clearly, then, was no knock on Santorum: The
“consultants” were not considering him a bad potential nominee;
they were just considering him a politically improbable one. But it
WAS a major knock on Gingrich and Romney, who were the
front-runners at the time. It shows that a lot of serious people
saw then what is still true today, which is that both Gingrich and
Romney would make extremely weak general-election candidates
against Barack Obama.
As Geraghty reports:
The low expectations for a write-in bid added to the appeal of
the plan; if the write-in bid finished with only a few percentage
points, no harm was done. But a third- or second-place finish would
generate enormous discussion.
It’s almost certainly too late now for such a plan to work. For
those who fear a devastating loss with Gingrich or Romney as the
nominee, Santorum seems the only other option, with the hope being
that his “upside” of attractiveness to blue collar workers and Rust
Belt people in general, combined with a good VP choice attractive
to coastal soccer-mom swing voters, could at least offer some hope
for a winning combination that neither Gingrich nor Romney could
do. National polls, which of course at this stage are almost
useless for “horse race” purposes but very instructive for purposes
of analyzing the general impression a candidate is making, show
that Santorum comes across as the “nicest” of all the GOP
candidates, and thus that his likeability quotient (to coin a
phrase) offers room for political growth.
Again, it’s hardly the same upside as a Ryan or Jindal or Bob
McDonnell might have offered, but it’s well within the
realm of reason.
Meanwhile, Geraghty’s article does make it interesting to wonder
what might have been….
Dai Alanye | 1.18.12 @ 1:08PM
The other possibility is Santorum as VP to Romney, although Romney 's consistently two-faced behavior makes this unplaltable to me. I could see Santorum as having an effect on Romney's policies, but Newt's VP would be kept busy simply figuring out what Gingrich's latest policy happened to be.
martin j smith| 1.18.12 @ 1:27PM
Or wonder what might yet be....
Casey Abell| 1.18.12 @ 2:57PM
"For those who fear a devastating loss with Gingrich or Romney as the nominee, Santorum seems the only other option, with the hope being that his "upside" of attractiveness to blue collar workers and Rust Belt people in general, combined with a good VP choice attractive to coastal soccer-mom swing voters, could at least offer some hope for a winning combination that neither Gingrich nor Romney could do."
More fantasy from Quin Hillyer. Reality and Quin aren't complete strangers, but they're at best nodding acquaintances.
Somebody tell Hillyer that there's a primary this week in South Carolina. And tell him that socially conservative SC is the best state imaginable for his darling Ricky. And then tell him that his darling Ricky is gonna get stomped into a distant third or fourth place behind Romney and Gingrich.
But don't worry. Quin will still fantasize that darling Ricky can build "a winning combination" better than anybody else.
Christopher C| 1.19.12 @ 7:22PM
The trouble is, Casey, that I think Mr Hillyer is pretty much right. The supposed front runner is a milquetoast candidate who cannot credibly engage on the one issue that energizes both ends of the political spectrum - healthcare, of course. Mr Gingrich appeals, but based on form, he is sure to explode about something or other, and greatly discredit himself. Mr Paul? Well, he's sure that half the federal government needs to be disestablished, and that's not such a crazy idea, but the belief that if the US just withdraws from the world, then certain elements in the world will stop attacking your country is plain silly. And he absolutely could not carry enough of the national electorate to win. And that leaves ... ? Which I believe is Mr Hillyer's point. And Dai Alanye's.