The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Remember when I was reporting on, and pushing a discussion of, a movement to draft Bobby Jindal or Paul Ryan? Well, Jim Geraghty has almost the entire story here, one I could not ethically report at the time. The long and short of it was that serious people were considering a write-in effort in New Hampshire. It has worked before. It, or a version of it, came closer than anyone knew. Of course, it would have eventually required the cooperation of reluctant non-candidates, but, hey, that’s what “draft” movements are all about: convincing reluctant non-candidates to become candidates after all.

Now this was before many people were accepting the idea that Rick Santorum actually had a real shot to move into the top tier of candidates. It clearly, then, was no knock on Santorum: The “consultants” were not considering him a bad potential nominee; they were just considering him a politically improbable one. But it WAS a major knock on Gingrich and Romney, who were the front-runners at the time. It shows that a lot of serious people saw then what is still true today, which is that both Gingrich and Romney would make extremely weak general-election candidates against Barack Obama.

As Geraghty reports:

The low expectations for a write-in bid added to the appeal of the plan; if the write-in bid finished with only a few percentage points, no harm was done. But a third- or second-place finish would generate enormous discussion.

It’s almost certainly too late now for such a plan to work. For those who fear a devastating loss with Gingrich or Romney as the nominee, Santorum seems the only other option, with the hope being that his “upside” of attractiveness to blue collar workers and Rust Belt people in general, combined with a good VP choice attractive to coastal soccer-mom swing voters, could at least offer some hope for a winning combination that neither Gingrich nor Romney could do. National polls, which of course at this stage are almost useless for “horse race” purposes but very instructive for purposes of analyzing the general impression a candidate is making, show that Santorum comes across as the “nicest” of all the GOP candidates, and thus that his likeability quotient (to coin a phrase) offers room for political growth.

Again, it’s hardly the same upside as a Ryan or Jindal or Bob McDonnell might have offered, but it’s well within the realm of reason.

Meanwhile, Geraghty’s article does make it interesting to wonder what might have been….

View all comments (4) |

Dai Alanye | 1.18.12 @ 1:08PM

The other possibility is Santorum as VP to Romney, although Romney 's consistently two-faced behavior makes this unplaltable to me. I could see Santorum as having an effect on Romney's policies, but Newt's VP would be kept busy simply figuring out what Gingrich's latest policy happened to be.

martin j smith| 1.18.12 @ 1:27PM

Or wonder what might yet be....

Casey Abell| 1.18.12 @ 2:57PM

"For those who fear a devastating loss with Gingrich or Romney as the nominee, Santorum seems the only other option, with the hope being that his "upside" of attractiveness to blue collar workers and Rust Belt people in general, combined with a good VP choice attractive to coastal soccer-mom swing voters, could at least offer some hope for a winning combination that neither Gingrich nor Romney could do."

More fantasy from Quin Hillyer. Reality and Quin aren't complete strangers, but they're at best nodding acquaintances.

Somebody tell Hillyer that there's a primary this week in South Carolina. And tell him that socially conservative SC is the best state imaginable for his darling Ricky. And then tell him that his darling Ricky is gonna get stomped into a distant third or fourth place behind Romney and Gingrich.

But don't worry. Quin will still fantasize that darling Ricky can build "a winning combination" better than anybody else.

Christopher C| 1.19.12 @ 7:22PM

The trouble is, Casey, that I think Mr Hillyer is pretty much right. The supposed front runner is a milquetoast candidate who cannot credibly engage on the one issue that energizes both ends of the political spectrum - healthcare, of course. Mr Gingrich appeals, but based on form, he is sure to explode about something or other, and greatly discredit himself. Mr Paul? Well, he's sure that half the federal government needs to be disestablished, and that's not such a crazy idea, but the belief that if the US just withdraws from the world, then certain elements in the world will stop attacking your country is plain silly. And he absolutely could not carry enough of the national electorate to win. And that leaves ... ? Which I believe is Mr Hillyer's point. And Dai Alanye's.

More Blog Posts by Quin Hillyer

http://spectator.org/blog/2012/01/18/geraghty-confirms-my-long-ago

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

ADVERTISEMENT