While Michele Bachmann may have exited the GOP presidential
race, Rick Perry
is planning to stick around despite a fifth place finish
in Iowa last night.
A short time ago, Perry tweeted,
“And the next leg of the marathon is the Palmetto State….Here we
come South Carolina!!!”
So does this mean that Perry is bypassing New Hampshire
altogether? Is he skipping the two debates scheduled for Saturday
night and Sunday morning in Manchester and Concord?
I guess we shouldn’t be totally surprised at this turn of
events. Unlike Bachmann, Perry has money to spend. But is it money
well spent? At this point, his presence in the race increases the
likelihood that Romney could prevail in South Carolina.
bill| 1.4.12 @ 12:17PM
Perry must campaign hard in SC because he has a good chance in winning the Evangelic voters, while Romney will have trouble with voters explaining his stance on abortion and gay marriage. Sanorum and Gingrich, both lacks resource and organization.
Perry has a "clear shot" in SC and can win it.
Al Adab| 1.4.12 @ 1:36PM
Why shouldn't all of them skip NH? After all it is not a state that can or will deliver even its paltry electoral votes to the GOP. Why should the party care who NH voters think should be the nominee? In fact the contrary might be a better choice.
Dai Alanye | 1.4.12 @ 2:33PM
Shame on Perry for sticking around. He can only play spoiler at this point.
crazy| 1.4.12 @ 2:41PM
Time will tell but what's left to throw at Perry? Aren't we just beginning the vetting of Santorum and Romney?
Al Adab| 1.4.12 @ 2:50PM
They will not vet Romney as he is the preferred condidate. (spelling intentional)