The American Spectator : The Spectacle Blog : Mark Levin Challenges Ron, Rand Paul on Third Party

William R| 1.3.12 @ 2:01PM

Mark Levin is a loser of the first magnitude.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?f.....mZeyaDsNss

tonypal| 1.3.12 @ 3:01PM

Really? Because he disagrees with you? That's one loser I'm glad to hang with.

voiceofthecitizenry| 1.3.12 @ 3:42PM

Mark Levin is an Israel first, America last blowhard. He is a loser. A big time loser.

Margie| 1.3.12 @ 4:15PM

That actually means he's a GREAT guy and a GREAT conservative!

voiceofthecitizenry| 1.3.12 @ 5:44PM

Good luck with the GED, Margie!

tonypal| 1.3.12 @ 5:56PM

Good luck with the Wasserman voiceofthecitizenry.

Margie| 1.3.12 @ 6:04PM

voice: A five year old could recognize that when a Paul-bot calls someone an "Israel-Firster", a blowhard and loser, it means just the opposite.

Heck, even a kindegartner could.. unless of course you had your schooling in the government run public school system.

Is that where Kelly Clarkson went???

voiceofthecitizenry| 1.3.12 @ 6:50PM

Good luck with the GED, Margie!

Quartermaster| 1.3.12 @ 7:39PM

The antiPaultard fever swamp is truly out gassing here. It's really s shame y'all can't really contemplate what you are going to say. Instead, you act like the leftists you say you hate. The lot of you are truly pathetic.

A pox on both your houses.

Margie| 1.3.12 @ 9:38PM

A lot of fantasy in the brains of Paul-bots, I notice.

voiceofthecitizenry| 1.3.12 @ 9:42PM

Dr. Ron Paul supporters are very clear about what they believe. They don't twist their words or their positions as some idiots would have you believe on here.

Margie| 1.3.12 @ 9:48PM

I know. For example when Ron Paul screams out: "THEY'RE TERRORISTS BECAUSE OF US!!!!"

Personally, I'm glad he doesn't hide his insanity.

Now, back to school fer ye, voiceover.

voiceofthecitizenry| 1.3.12 @ 10:11PM

I have a PhD. No more schooling for me.

90% of the casualties of war are civilians. That's why their families hate us; it's because we are free! More war. Hooray! Iran, here we come. Israel's former defense minster said he agrees withRron Paul that the US should stay out of Israel's business. Israel has bombed Iran weapons sites before. They don't deserve billions from us.

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 9:52PM

That Means Levin Is A Traitor Bastard, Just Like You, Israel FirsterSmear Bund Broad, Margie.

The Tea Party Steps On The Smear Bund Broad, Margie.

kingwilly| 1.12.12 @ 1:07AM

If that's the case, Margie, let me get this straight because "Conservative" apparently doesn't mean what it used to. Nowadays, it means you can CLAIM to be a CONSERVATIVE when it comes to domestic issues even though you may not really be (right, Mr. Rick Santorum?) At the same time, you must be a LIBERAL when it comes to foreign policy and allow the government to flush the hard-earned money you pay in taxes down the toilet in the name of "national security," in the process denying people in other countries of their God-given rights by straddling them with "Made in the USA" dictators. Only then can you truly call yourself a conservative, according to Mark Levin.

Did I sum that up right, Margie? Instead of being pro-Israel, why don't you try being pro-USA first? Then you can be pro-Israel all you want as long as you don't drag me into it if I choose not to follow. You never know, I may actually choose to follow and it would be by my own free-will. What a concept!

tonypal| 1.3.12 @ 5:55PM

Again I ask, really? Have you ever actually listened to his show? You RonPaulbots are earily similar to the Obamabots. Must make you proud.

Skippy| 1.3.12 @ 7:34PM

I have noticed that myself.
Paulbots are ready to sink the country if their boy doesn't get the respect they think he deserves.
Conservatives despise Obama.
Paulbots despise everybody except RuPaul.

Quartermaster| 1.3.12 @ 7:36PM

And, what happens if Rand says his father is wrong and doesn't support the man?

Levin is just being Levin. He's as much of a blowhard as Limbaugh is. The difference is Rush is far more entertaining.

mike | 1.3.12 @ 9:39PM

who have you sold your soul out too . wait let me guess this could be really fun at least for me and to tell you the truth my first two guesses are probally as rigth as the third

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 8:06PM

Nah !

Because Levin Is An Israel Firster Traitor Bastard.

That's Silly. We Didn't Hang Israel Firster Spies Ben ami Kadish And Jonathan Pollard, Who Had The Same Handler Out Of The NYC Israeli Consulate.

The Tea Party Rebellion Is Here And In Iowa.

Margie| 1.3.12 @ 4:17PM

"a loser of the first magnitude."

We had a 4.3 magnitude the other day here in Ohio. I'd put Levin in at least that category of Earth shaking.. CONSERVATISM!!

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 8:08PM

That Would Be Your Old Man,The Crippled Russkie Bigot.

The Tea Party Rebellion Steps On American Spectator's Resident RINO-CINO Israel Firster Smear Bund Bigot Broad, Margie.

Margie| 1.3.12 @ 9:42PM

Mark Levin is FABULOUS!!
He's a TRUE conservative, and he's a JEW, too!!
And I agree with him just about 100% of the time because he makes all the sense in the world about what he stands for.
I'm PRO-ISRAEL, too.
Always have been, always will be.
And I DESPISE creeps like you, bud.
Even though some of the assholes here try and say I'm like you~ LOL!!!!

mike | 1.3.12 @ 9:52PM

so you like stolen goods do you maggie well if that be the case just give me your address and leave the door open and for convievnce leave ever thing you value on your doorstep.

Tom| 1.3.12 @ 5:04PM

"a loser of the first magnitude."

NOBODY could ever claim that distinction so long as Der Kult Fuhrer has a breath remaining in his wretched old body.

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 8:11PM

That Would Be Yo Mama, Israel Firster Smear Bund Ass Clown.

The Tea Party Rebellion Steps On Israel Firster Ass Clown,Thomasina.

Tom| 1.3.12 @ 9:13PM

Go kiss your swastika, neo-Nazi Paultard scum.

BTW, what street corner in Des Moines is that bitch of a mama of yours working tonight?

WJ| 1.3.12 @ 6:17PM

Exactly. Levin is a clown. The fat little jerk is going to work against Rand Paul??? Are you kidding me? He was one of the few senators that voted against the illegal detention of American citizens.

C4LCNCPLS| 1.3.12 @ 2:12PM

ROFL, it does not matter if Ron Paul runs 3rd party or not. If, Ron Paul does not get the nominaton, Obama gets 4 more years.

The only candidate who has the right bold ideas is Ron Paul and, only Ron Paul can beat Obama.

If, Ron Paul gets the GOP nomination: Ron Paul gets the following voters:

(A) 2008 Obama voters who thought they were going to get 'Change'
(B) 2008 Obama voters who voted to end the wars.
(C) The VAST majority of the Independent vote,
(D) The entire GOP voting block who dislikes Obama enough to vote for Ron Paul instead.
(E) Ron Paul supporters coming out to vote in DROVESand, a machine like no other for the General Elections! (No other candidate can compete against Obama's machine but Ron Paul! Wake Up People!)
(F) Same-sex couples who want to be set free.
(G) Democratic, disillusioned Anti-Drug war voters.
(H) Libertarians.
(I) Youth Vote (Obama has lost them to Ron Paul but, if RP does not get the nomination, they will go back to Obama)

Also, keep in mind, that the Independents have the largest voting block in this country. Republicans and Democrats are the minorities. For the GOP to attack the only candidate on the GOP ticket that can beat Obama is truly insane!

The GOP did not learn anything from 2008. They keep doing the same thing over and over expecting different results! Only idiots do that!

Listen up MINORITY GOP...If, you do not get behind Ron Paul, YOU WILL get 4 more years of Obama! GUARANTEED!!!!!!!!

No Ron Paul supporter will vote for any other GOP Candidate. Independents will go back to Obama as will the disenfranchised Democrats and the youth vote!

Solo| 1.3.12 @ 2:32PM

Boy! You PaulBots have got it bad!
Get a grip! We've seen this movie already.
RuPaul is NEVER going to get the GOP nomination. Moreover...IF nominated, he is about the ONLY republican candidate who has NO CHANCE of defeating Obama.

Anyone who thinks that the RuPaul is anything other than a national joke has got his tin-foil hat on too tight.

Rienone| 1.3.12 @ 2:36PM

LOL! RuPaul?... what a pathetic attempt at an insult. You sound like 7th grader. Anyone who thinks that the Ron Paul is anything other than a patriot has got an establishment ass-hat on too tight.

Simon Templar| 1.3.12 @ 3:06PM

Establishment ass hat? First grade stuff.

See any irony here?

tire if all the ad hom | 1.3.12 @ 6:39PM

"what a pathetic attempt at an insult. You sound like 7th grader."

And your intellectual response was a real mind-changer.

MT| 1.3.12 @ 3:57PM

" he is about the ONLY republican candidate who has NO CHANCE of defeating Obama"

It's comments like these that fly in the face of reality that neocon propagandists like Levin and Lord rely on to promote their own ignorance. Apparently, you do not spend any time looking at the poll results which shows consistently that Paul polls 1st or 2nd best against Obama, is the only one who beats Obama with Independents, and is the only one capable of pulling a significant portion of disaffected liberals and progressives. Those are evidence by actual poll results. What evidence do you have to back your silly claim that he has no chance?

tire if all the ad hom | 1.3.12 @ 6:40PM

"actual poll results"

oxymoroan

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 8:15PM

" Ron Paul Maintains Lead in Latest PPP Iowa Poll
Survey shows broad support, strong organization

LAKE JACKSON, Texas, Jan 02, 2012 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- 2012 GOP Presidential candidate Ron Paul is leading Iowa according to a new PPP poll released yesterday evening, with 20 percent of the vote. The survey has Paul also leading among Independents and Democrats with 30 percent of the vote, more than twice that of the nearest challenger.

"As evidenced by the standing-room only crowds, Ron Paul has broad support and a top notch ground organization," said Ron Paul 2012 National Campaign Chairman Jesse Benton. "Despite a coordinated assault by the establishment, Congressman Paul is in the lead and headed toward a top finish in the Hawkeye state."

This comes on the heels of a CNN/Time poll which showed Ron Paul strong against President Obama. Highlights from the poll include Paul besting Obama 47 to 46 percent among those 65 years and older, said to be the most reliable voters. Paul also beats Obama among persons who reside in rural areas 52 to 44 percent and with Independents 48 to 47 percent. "

The Tea Party Rebellion Is Here And In Iowa.

Le Cracquere| 1.3.12 @ 2:53PM

"If, you do not get behind Ron Paul, YOU WILL get 4 more years of Obama! GUARANTEED!!!!!!!!" [sic]

If those are the only choices on offer (which is doubtful), one can live with four more years of Obama.

tonypal| 1.3.12 @ 3:00PM

My friend, if Ron Paul is the nominee, I sit home and watch Obama get re-elected.

Hobbes| 1.3.12 @ 3:14PM

We don't need chicken hawks like you anyway.

Skippy| 1.3.12 @ 4:35PM

Ron Paul is the only Repub. running for whom I would not vote.
Better to keep the Communist we know than the delusional paranoid schizophrenic we don't.

tonypal| 1.3.12 @ 5:57PM

It only took you 14 minutes to come up with that? I'm impressed.

Margie| 1.3.12 @ 4:19PM

I believe I would be joining you in sitting home as well, tonypal.
For the first time in my entire voting life.

Tom| 1.3.12 @ 5:16PM

If I HAD to choose between the two, I would probably choose Obama. At least he would do SOMETHING to defend this country against its enemies. Herr Doktor Nutjob would be giving Presidential addresses on how it's really our fault while foreign armies are marching through the centers of towns.

Le Cracquere| 1.3.12 @ 5:44PM

I'm with Tom. W/r/t foreign policy, at least Obama might ACCIDENTALLY do the right thing here and there.

The Bruce| 1.3.12 @ 10:18PM

Very true, because at least a broken clock is right twice a day.

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 8:17PM

We Don't Need Your Vote RINO-CINO Fop.

The Tea Party Rebellion Is Here And In Iowa.

Tom| 1.3.12 @ 9:15PM

Herr KKKlint, your very existance is a detriment to the well-being of mankind; Paultard slimeball.

tonypal| 1.3.12 @ 3:04PM

If no Ron Paul supporter would vote for another GOP candidate, why would republicans who don't support Ron Paul vote for him?

Incidentally, if someone other than Ron Paul wins the nomination and defeats Obama, will you be back here in November to apologize for all of your childish name calling?

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 8:19PM

No, RINO-CINO Ass Clown.

The Tea Party Rebellion Is Here And In Iowa.

Indy| 1.3.12 @ 3:08PM

I'm an independent as are many of my friends and family...I think independents are not understood by many in the media, political consultants, party leadership and others. I for one am not happy with either party, the establishment rules the GOP and MoveOn / Soros rule the Left and is driving this country off the cliff. Please don't think RP has my vote, he certainly does not. Some conservatives I know will reluctantly vote for him but have strong misgivings about his foreign policy stance and view on legalizing drugs. The majority of independents I am in contact with do not support RP but that's my small world, I am smart enough not to extrapolate that to the Indy masses, you seem to think you are....RP's foreign policy is a show stopper for me...no that does not make me a neocon.

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 8:21PM

Do Your Homework.

This comes on the heels of a CNN/Time poll which showed Ron Paul strong against President Obama. Highlights from the poll include Paul besting Obama 47 to 46 percent among those 65 years and older, said to be the most reliable voters. Paul also beats Obama among persons who reside in rural areas 52 to 44 percent and with Independents 48 to 47 percent. "

The Tea Party Rebellion Is Here And In Iowa.

The Bruce| 1.3.12 @ 10:24PM

You left out his best polling-- among 9/11 Truthers, FEMA Camp believers, Chem-trailers, Bilderberg nutters (anti-Semites), other assorted conspiracy-theory nutters, and people who spend way to much time listening to Alex Jones and his assorted fear-monger websites.

The Bruce| 1.3.12 @ 10:27PM

Sorry, I left out Neo-Nazis and the KKK. How on earth did I forget that crowd?

Jack| 1.4.12 @ 11:49PM

At least he doesn't have bigots who paint unrealistic pictures of their opponents beliefs and views to try and prove their points.

Indy| 1.3.12 @ 10:50PM

Polls, really? The only poll that will matter is on election day, I highly doubt Ron Paul will be on the ballot as the GOP nominee...he may decide to run independent and will hand the race to Obama. Maybe you are ok with that, not me.

I don't put faith in polls, certainly not at the national level, to have a chance at any meaning they must be state by state and we have to know details about the sample and how the question was asked. I see a PPP poll and hit the delete key, as I do with many others including CNN / Times.

Are you sure you have completed your homework on RP? The more I learn the more time I will spend informing others, voters must be informed before casting a ballot.

"In July 2010, Barney Frank and Ron Paul co-authored a Huffington Post article rolling out their Sustainable Defense Task Force. The Task Force “consisting of experts on military expenditures that span the ideological spectrum” would recommend a trillion dollars in defense cuts. The experts, however, didn’t quite “span the ideological spectrum” — more like float under it.

The panel of experts who would decide how to best gut national defense featured such independent thinkers as William D. Hartung of the New America Foundation. Hartung’s main expertise was appearing in “Hijacking Catastrophe: 9/11, Fear & the Selling of American Empire.”

Then there was Lawrence J. Kolb of the Center for American Progress and Miriam Pemberton of the Institute for Policy Studies. If you want to know what the Center, the Foundation and the Institute all have in common, it’s Hungarian and smells like stale cabbage and the death of nations.

The rather creepy Institute for Policy Studies issued a paper proposing that Obama act as king and rule through executive orders. The New American Foundation is not only backed by Soros but has his son on its leadership council. The Center for American Progress is run by the co-chair of Obama’s transition team and is, for all intents and purposes, the think tank of the White House. All three are Soros funded.

But it doesn’t end there. Also on the panel was Christopher Hellman of the National Priorities Project (NPP). If you are wondering what the NPP is, it’s a think tank whose objective is to “influence national spending priorities.” And if you’re in the mood for a double, Miriam Pemberton is also on the board of the NPP. The man behind the curtain at NPP? None other than our favorite Hungarian James Bond villain.

Going further down the list there’s Winslow Wheeler of the Center for Defense Information (CDI). The CDI’s goal is to strengthen “national and international security through international cooperation [and] reduced reliance on unilateral military power to resolve conflict.” CDI operates under the aegis of the World Security Institute, which is apparently the least creepy name they could think of. Wheeler is a Counterpunch contributor, a site which even Stalinists think goes a bit too far. CDI gets money from the Open Society Institute (OSI) where the stench of death and stale cabbage never goes away.

Then there’s Charles Knight and Carl Conetta of the Project for Defense Alternatives, which appears to be a subset of the Commonwealth Institute. Of its board of directors, S.M. Miller is also the founder of United for a Fair Economy which enjoys generous support from a certain philanthropic chap who occasionally destroys economies for sport. Another member, Guy Molyneux, has also worked with OSI. A third board member, Richard Healey, was formerly director of the Institute for Policy Studies and is on the advisory board of the Center for Social Inclusion, founded by two OSI veterans.

If you think this can’t get any worse, meet Paul Kawika Martin of Peace Action (PA). You might know PA better by its old name, the “Committee for a SANE Nuclear Policy” or just “SANE,” a Communist front group investigated by none other than Senator Thomas Dodd. PA has the same attitude toward American defense that burglars have toward alarm systems in other people’s homes. They don’t like them very much. And they have a “five year strategic plan” for the job.

Paul Kawika Martin travels around fighting progress on board The Rainbow Warrior and is also involved with Physicians for Social Responsibility. Martin has also collaborated with the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), a front for the Iranian regime. I think you can guess by now who funds Physicians for Social Responsibility.

Also on the task force is Laicie Olson of the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation. The Center is actually a subset of the Council for a Livable World. Olson originally worked for Physicians for Social Responsibility.

Another task force member was Heather Hurlburt of the National Security Network (NSN). The NSN’s goals are to “build a strong progressive national security and counter conservative spin.” Its founder was part of Obama’s transition team and resigned to work for Janet Napolitano. Soros’s OSI helped fund NSN, and its Special Counsel was on the NSN Policy Committee.

If you’re tired of reading through all this, then here’s the summary. Of the Paul-Frank Task Force, 9 out of 14 members were linked to Soros’s organs. Two were affiliated with the Cato Institute. One is indeterminate.

Ron Paul proposed to put a bunch of Soros-funded think tank experts in charge of dismantling the US military. Think about that for a moment. Ron Paul supporters can see conspiracies in a glass of water; can they see anything wrong with this picture? Can they see anything wrong with having a man from a group that was investigated for its Communist ties in the driver’s seat on national defense?

The task force’s proposals included cutting nuclear deterrence; reducing the fleet by 57 ships, including two carriers; canceling the Joint Strike Fighter; “severely curtail missile defense” — and that is a direct quote from the report — retiring four Marine battalions; reducing the military by 200,000 personnel; cutting defense research spending by 50 billion over ten years; and increasing health care fees for members of the military.

Not only did Paul join forces with Barney Frank to slash military preparedness, but he ended up putting the experts of a foreign billionaire with global ambitions in charge of the project. And that was what he did as a congressman. Can anyone imagine what he would do as president?

But why would Ron Paul allow George Soros that much power and influence over America’s defense policy? There are a number of possibilities. There is the possibility that Ron Paul just didn’t know and didn’t bother to do his research. Which is not much of a recommendation for the job he’s running for. There’s another possibility that Ron Paul knew and didn’t care, that he had no objection to being part of a left-right alliance against the “American Empire” with Soros. But there’s also a third possibility.

During the previous election, Americans Against Escalation in Iraq (AAEI) ran an ad praising Ron Paul for his position against the war. AAEI was an umbrella group for MoveOn.org, the Center for American Progress, SEIU, Americans United For Change, the National Security Network and others in the progressive bestiary. A number of those beasties were Soros groups.

I’m not one to dabble in conspiracy theories, but when Soros pays for an ad praising you during the Republican primaries and then you put his experts in charge of America’s defense policy, then maybe some questions should be asked."
http://patdollard.com/2012/01/.....onnection/

naql| 1.4.12 @ 4:38AM

Eh, what? Who's a communist? That was so long, I forgot who you were trying to smear by the time I reached the end of it.

Crassus| 1.3.12 @ 3:09PM

I know the legalize drugs crowd worships the ground on which RuPaul treks but most of them will be too stoned to get to the polls on election day.

David| 1.3.12 @ 3:57PM

So Im a druggie? Why do you need a law from the gov to tell you not to do drugs? LOL Can you make any decisions for yourself? I know not to do drugs without laws. I thought conservative meant to repeal laws not create them. Public education?

David| 1.3.12 @ 3:58PM

So Im a druggie? Why do you need a law from the gov to tell you not to do drugs? LOL Can you make any decisions for yourself? I know not to do drugs without laws. I thought conservative meant to repeal laws not create them. Public education?

Skippy| 1.3.12 @ 4:37PM

You're spaced out, dude.
You already posted that comment, man.

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 8:26PM

Are You Tellin' Us You're This Kind Of Ass Clown Without Bein' On Drugs, Skippy?

That's Impressive.

Say Hi To Scooter.

The Tea Party Rebellion Is Here And In Iowa.

Mike| 1.3.12 @ 3:41PM

No Paul supporter has answered my questions about Paul being antiChristian. I guess you are acknowledging he is? Isn't that an important issue. Paul always takes the side of Muslims in any dispute, and he always goes against Christians. In every case Muslims killed Christians, he thinks it was justified, although in any case Christians killed Muslims, it is never justified. In the last few years, a Muslim person shot people at a military base in Texas. It's Paul's home state, but he refused to condemn the person. I couldn’t find any record of support for Christians Paul has made in the last 10 years. If Paul were president, he would have to represent Christians, not just Muslims.

David| 1.3.12 @ 4:03PM

When you LISTEN to Ron Paul you will HEAR he is for INDVIDUAL LIBERTY. He protects YOUR right as an INDIVIDUAL to do what you please as long as you are not hurting, defaming, etc... others. You are asking about a collective issue. You watch WAy too much TV and dont do any research or think for yourself. Its what sheep do.

Mike| 1.3.12 @ 4:59PM

First of all, I don't even own a TV. Second, you must not read it very well.
Paul seems to protect Muslims as a collective enemy.

So, I have no right to practice the religion of my choice? That's not an individual right?

If I get murdered because of my religion, you are saying Paul is okay with it, because I made the evil choice of practicing the wrong religion?

What you are claiming actually goes against individual rights?

I notice you didn't deny that Paul is anti-Christian, you just said it doesn't matter.

Paul is going to lose a lot of potential voters, by keeping this up.

You and Paul have the right to think Christians are scum. But he wants to be president, and if doesn't believe in the individual rights of a significant portion of the country, he's not going to do a good job.

Becky| 1.5.12 @ 10:08AM

Mike, I'm not sure you are grasping what David told you. Dr. Paul believes in individual rights. Yes, religious freedom is an individual right. It's why this country was founded. Dr. Paul believes that you have the right to be a Christian just like your neighbor has the right to be Muslim/Jewish/Taoist/Buddhists, etc.

Dr. Paul believes we are capable of making our own decisions in life instead of having to be told what to do by the government. As long as we are not hurting anyone else or depriving anyone else of their personal liberties then Dr. Paul is okay with. So if you get murdered because of your religion/sexual orientation/any other reason then no, Dr. Paul is not okay with it.

Dr. Paul is a Christian. He's actually Baptist. He is pro-life, but he doesn't believe that abortion is an issue that the federal government has any say on. He is a stong supporter of states' rights and believes that decisions on abortion, legalization of drugs, legalization of prostitution, and marriage should be left to each state and the residents of those states to decide.

Tom| 1.3.12 @ 4:38PM

That's because as a libertarian, Herr Doktor Nutjob worships nothing else besides the sacred, sovereign ME.

Jack| 1.4.12 @ 11:58PM

He worships a statist puppet named Tom... why that doesn't seem right...

OH, so you are immaturely joking that, while he is a practicing christian, your kind have painted his dedication to the pursuit of individual liberties and rights for various religious groups to be selfish... well you have a point. Its not like the US wasn't founded by people who like liberties and freedoms or anything.. OH WAIT. IT WAS.

Also, side note. It doesn't give your point any credibility when you call him "RuPaul" or "Herr Doktor Nutjob"... it just makes you seem like a bigoted, hillbilly prick.

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 8:31PM

You Could Ask, " Catholics For Ron Paul 2012 "

http://www.facebook.com/pages/.....7075062552

The Tea Party Rebellion Is Here And In Iowa.

Tom| 1.3.12 @ 9:46PM

"Catholic for Ron Paul" has about as much credibility as pro-abortion group "Catholics for Choice."

http://www.catholicsforchoice.org/

mike | 1.3.12 @ 10:02PM

you sure are enjoy your inprisonment are you not the labels that you use does not make me any freer

Tom| 1.3.12 @ 4:40PM

Dream on Paultard, dream on.

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 8:32PM

Dance Israel Firster Monkey, Dance.

The Tea Party Rebellion Is Here And In Iowa.

Tom| 1.3.12 @ 9:17PM

Burn in hell, Nazi slimeball.

Jack| 1.5.12 @ 12:02AM

Godwin's law much? I think that makes you officially discredited in providing any legitimate arguments at this point... Doubly so since there are absolutely no similarities to the Nazi movement and Libertarian Republicanism...

JR| 1.3.12 @ 5:34PM

In reply to section F of your statement where in the Constitution does the right to get married exist? Marriage has NEVER been between two of the same sex in the thousands of years it has existed. So same sex marriage is not a Constitutional issue. No one is stopping gay people from getting married just not allowing them to change the definition of marriage. So go blog on the Nations website and get that gay shit out of here.

JR| 1.3.12 @ 5:35PM

And yes I meant gay in a bad way. Also there is something wrong with it.

The Bruce| 1.3.12 @ 10:38PM

"No one is stopping gay people from getting married just not allowing them to change the definition of marriage."

Come again? Wouldn't letting them get married change the definition of marriage? Or did you mean, "live together" in the first part of that sentence?

mike | 1.3.12 @ 9:43PM

rite on

Trinacria| 1.3.12 @ 2:14PM

It's not personal, Rand, it's strictly business. Hey Paulie, leave the gun, take the canoli...

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 8:38PM

Bibi will make Little Markie Levin an offer he can't refuse. Take the Gefilta Fish.

The Tea Party Rebellion Is Here And In Iowa.

Joe M| 1.3.12 @ 2:14PM

All of this is predicated on the assumption that 1) Paul won't win the GOP nomination; and 2) Paul wouldn't win the general in the three way race.

If Paul began polling ahead of the GOP candidate in a general election, would people like Mark Levin start threatening the GOP candidate for acting as a spoiler and getting Obama re-elected?

Crassus| 1.3.12 @ 3:00PM

Have another drink, Junior. Your scenario isn't going to happen.

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 8:41PM

Have Another Prune, Pops Crassus , You're Blood Sugar's Low.

The Tea Party Rebellion Is Here And In Iowa.

tonypal| 1.3.12 @ 3:25PM

Or maybe a 4th party space alien, the kind that Ron Paul apparently saw while hangin' with Dennis Kucinich, will enter the race. Maybe it will be Kang and Kodos from The Simpsons. If they start polling ahead of everyone, including Ron Paul, will you chuck your boy overboard for the sake of the country to prevent Obama's re-election.

How about if a Ron Paul supporter ran as a 5th party candidate. Would that person vote for himself, or would he still pull the lever for Ron Paul? What if Ron Paul is really Barack Obama in disguise and winds up winning the nomination? What if this bogus Ron Paul wins in November?

There are so many possibilities, especially when Ron Paul is involved. Perhaps Ron Paul finds out he's really Jewish and punches himself out during campaign stop. Who knows? I sure don't.

What I do know is this: It's all a one way street with you people. If Ron Paul is the nominee, would we dare not vote for Ron Paul and guarantee Obama's re-election. Yet it's perfectly alright for Ron Paul to run 3rd party, thus handing Obama 4 more years. It's also perfectly alright for Ron Paul supporters to sit home if their beloved leader is not the GOP nominee. What's it gonna be buddy? You can't have it both ways. Either we're all in this together, regardless of the nominee. Or it's every man for himself.

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 8:43PM

" Ron Paul Maintains Lead in Latest PPP Iowa Poll
Survey shows broad support, strong organization

LAKE JACKSON, Texas, Jan 02, 2012 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- 2012 GOP Presidential candidate Ron Paul is leading Iowa according to a new PPP poll released yesterday evening, with 20 percent of the vote. The survey has Paul also leading among Independents and Democrats with 30 percent of the vote, more than twice that of the nearest challenger.

"As evidenced by the standing-room only crowds, Ron Paul has broad support and a top notch ground organization," said Ron Paul 2012 National Campaign Chairman Jesse Benton. "Despite a coordinated assault by the establishment, Congressman Paul is in the lead and headed toward a top finish in the Hawkeye state."

This comes on the heels of a CNN/Time poll which showed Ron Paul strong against President Obama. Highlights from the poll include Paul besting Obama 47 to 46 percent among those 65 years and older, said to be the most reliable voters. Paul also beats Obama among persons who reside in rural areas 52 to 44 percent and with Independents 48 to 47 percent. "

The Tea Party Rebellion Is Here And In Iowa.

Indy| 1.3.12 @ 2:17PM

Rand Paul "I don't think it's a good idea"
audio at the link

http://www.wgiram.com/cc-commo.....le=9557982

Ron Paul Is A Lunatic| 1.3.12 @ 2:22PM

Ron Paul is nuts. His foreign policy would be suicide for this great nation as much as Obama's domestic policy is. All the Paul supporters should get their heads out of their a$$e$ and realize if by some stroke of Allah Paul wins the nomination then Obama is guaranteed 4 more years. Levin is right - you Rue Paul support's just need to follow these simple instructions: 1- Grab your ears, 2- Pull your head our of your a$$.

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 8:43PM

" Ron Paul Maintains Lead in Latest PPP Iowa Poll
Survey shows broad support, strong organization

LAKE JACKSON, Texas, Jan 02, 2012 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- 2012 GOP Presidential candidate Ron Paul is leading Iowa according to a new PPP poll released yesterday evening, with 20 percent of the vote. The survey has Paul also leading among Independents and Democrats with 30 percent of the vote, more than twice that of the nearest challenger.

"As evidenced by the standing-room only crowds, Ron Paul has broad support and a top notch ground organization," said Ron Paul 2012 National Campaign Chairman Jesse Benton. "Despite a coordinated assault by the establishment, Congressman Paul is in the lead and headed toward a top finish in the Hawkeye state."

This comes on the heels of a CNN/Time poll which showed Ron Paul strong against President Obama. Highlights from the poll include Paul besting Obama 47 to 46 percent among those 65 years and older, said to be the most reliable voters. Paul also beats Obama among persons who reside in rural areas 52 to 44 percent and with Independents 48 to 47 percent. "

The Tea Party Rebellion Is Here And In Iowa.

The Bruce| 1.3.12 @ 10:43PM

Clint, you could substitute the words "Ron Paul" with "Obama" and it wouldn't mean the people are any less stupid.

Picture this, Ron Paul as President and Putin as president of Russia. Now picture Russia moving on Europe as Ron Paul watches the world burn. Ron Paul would probably sit by and blame the United States for ending the Cold War, thereby installing Putin via proxy.

Jack| 1.5.12 @ 12:17AM

Yes... because Putin, who is busy dealing with a country in moderate political upheaval, unwarranted western discrimination, not to mention being the neighbor of despotic former Soviet neighbors, like good old genocidally insane Georgia (a current US supported ally...), REALLY wants to get involved in an economically unfeasible campaign to diabolically take over the shattered economic crutch known as Europe, which would not only weaken his grip at home, but piss of China, India... would be big enough to cause even the UN to intervene...

What I'm trying to get to here is that, after looking at this topic extensively for an essay in my last year of high school, well, even a high school student can tell you how hilariously impractical and illogical your argument is.

Furthermore, instead of worrying about Russia, a country which has a completely different political climate, we should be worrying about AMERICA, and how to fix it. And Europe isn't our problem either. Fact of the matter is, the statist dogma that Obama, and to an extent the other leading Republican Candidates are supporting, is why they are in such an economic mess, and could even be remotely susceptible to Russian Dominance... which they WON'T...

MikeInOhio| 1.3.12 @ 2:24PM

Hate to break it to you Jeffrey, but several weeks ago Pat Buchanan raised the issue of Sen. Rand Paul's career in the context of a potential Ron Paul 3rd party bid. This isn't an original thought on the part of Mark Levin. Win or lose, Ron Paul will have contributed significantly to a movement that will outlast any legacy that Levin may leave behind.

Ron Paul Is A Lunatic| 1.3.12 @ 2:24PM

And C4LCNCPLS, your Doctor called- your meds are ready. Paul is the ONLY republican Obama can beat because he's the only one more nuts than Obama. Paul is the only on not concerned with Iran getting a nuke- he even tries to justify it. Effing moron.

Rienone| 1.3.12 @ 2:33PM

You sound so pathetic an intellectually void. "Effing Moron"? Is that all you've got! Do you realize how feeble your argument against Ron Paul sounds? All neanderthal attacks and no viable basis.

Simon Templar| 1.3.12 @ 3:10PM

Actually, it sounds just like you and your pals for Paul when you are commenting on the other candidates.

Hobbes| 1.3.12 @ 3:20PM

Ron Paul is the only traditional conservative in the bunch. Anti-war. Anti-government. Anti-social engineering. Pro-religion. Go back to the founders: Kirk, Nisbet, Weaver, if you can read. You anti-Paul people are all Neo-Cons who want to spread democracy to the desert and bankrupt America. Not on our watch. The Ron Paul Revolution continues!

Skippy| 1.3.12 @ 4:41PM

"You anti-Paul people are all JOOOZZ! who want to spread democracy to the desert and bankrupt America. "
There: I fixed it for you.

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 8:47PM

"You anti-Paul people are all RINO-CINO'S who want to spread Our American Taxpayer Money to the desert and bankrupt America. "
There: I fixed it for you.

The Tea Party Rebellion Is Here And In Iowa.

Len| 1.3.12 @ 5:04PM

What's so conservative about being a Tip O'Neill tax and spend type. When you actually sort out Paul's record, he's one of the worst in Congress at wasteful spending. How did he get the misleading reputation of being against wasteful spending?

Jack| 1.5.12 @ 12:21AM

Wow... that... it actually gave me a migraine because of how completely incorrect you are...

JR| 1.3.12 @ 5:40PM

Personally Hobbes I couldnt care less about spreading democracy to the middle east. I want to spread destruction to our enemies so they fear us more than anything else. Crush them like we crushed the nazi's plain and simple. Who cares at this point why our enemies attacked us, they did so destroy them. I'm so sick of this pansy ass bull shit. After September 11 kill em all and let God sort em out.

The Bruce| 1.3.12 @ 10:51PM

Stop wordsmithing, Hobbes. He's a Libertarian, not a "traditional" Conservative. He's for a couple of conservative principles, but many of this others (mainly foreign policy) are straight out of the Left.

And, no, I'm not some "NeoCon" seeking to spread democracy around the world.

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 8:44PM

" Ron Paul Maintains Lead in Latest PPP Iowa Poll
Survey shows broad support, strong organization

LAKE JACKSON, Texas, Jan 02, 2012 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- 2012 GOP Presidential candidate Ron Paul is leading Iowa according to a new PPP poll released yesterday evening, with 20 percent of the vote. The survey has Paul also leading among Independents and Democrats with 30 percent of the vote, more than twice that of the nearest challenger.

"As evidenced by the standing-room only crowds, Ron Paul has broad support and a top notch ground organization," said Ron Paul 2012 National Campaign Chairman Jesse Benton. "Despite a coordinated assault by the establishment, Congressman Paul is in the lead and headed toward a top finish in the Hawkeye state."

This comes on the heels of a CNN/Time poll which showed Ron Paul strong against President Obama. Highlights from the poll include Paul besting Obama 47 to 46 percent among those 65 years and older, said to be the most reliable voters. Paul also beats Obama among persons who reside in rural areas 52 to 44 percent and with Independents 48 to 47 percent. "

The Tea Party Rebellion Is Here And In Iowa.

OldBlindDog| 1.3.12 @ 2:25PM

It doesn't matter. I'm not voting for Newt Romney.

Skippy| 1.3.12 @ 5:04PM

Barack Hussein Obama sends you his personal thanks, Paulbot.

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 8:50PM

Bibi sends you his personal thanks, Bibi Butt Boy.

The Tea Party Rebellion Is Here And In Iowa.

Jack| 1.5.12 @ 12:23AM

So, by your logic, instead of using our constitutionally given right to vote for who we believe is the best candidate, we should settle for a statist Republican, or a statist Democrat? That doesn't seem to make too much sense...

Ron Paul Is A Lunatic| 1.3.12 @ 2:27PM

What legacy is that MikeInOhio? The legacy of being the craziest nut in the nuthouse? Why don't you put down the funny papers and read Paul's newsletters from the past. He's certifiable. Levin- well, he did write that little book a while back that sold 1.2+ million copies. Not quite a paranoid newsletter, but not bad either. You Moron.

Ron Paul Is A Lunatic| 1.3.12 @ 2:29PM

OldBlindDog: You might want to consider that choice. I don't like them either, but either is better than Obama if simply because Ginsburg will be retiring from the SC soon and whoever Romney or Newt put up will be a hellofa lot better that whoever Obama nominates.

Bemused| 1.3.12 @ 2:29PM

Didn't that "bipartisan statesman" Joe Lieberman do the same thing? Glass houses, rocks...

SCPOret| 1.3.12 @ 2:37PM

You Paulbots need a glassectomy. That's where the belly button is removed and a window installed so you can see with your head up your butt.

9thID| 1.3.12 @ 2:50PM

Does it allow them to still smoke dope too?

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 8:53PM

You Bibi Butt Boys Wear Your Asshats. That's Where Your Head Is So Far Up Your Ass,You're Wearing It For A Hat.

The Tea Party Rebellion Is Here And In Iowa.

Mimi Mayes | 1.3.12 @ 2:39PM

I'm so sick of Paulbots EVERYWHERE. I will do the same as Mark -- help to make sure Rand's career is over if Ron goes 3rd party. He's a crackpot, and I know a lot of you Paulbots are Dems trying reverse Operation Chaos.

9thID| 1.3.12 @ 2:51PM

"Crackpot" suits Paul well as the majority of his cult following love both...

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 8:59PM

Actually, A Lot Of Us Are Registered Republicans, Who Are Tea Party Patriots And Are Sick Of You RINO-CINO'S Trying To Sell Us Your Crap Sandwiches.

We Are Being Set Up By RINO-CINO Flunkie Stooges For The Ruling Elites' Frontman Mittens Romney.

These Are The RINO-CINO Flunkie Stooges Who Gave Us The Serial Traitor To Conservatism, John McCain Of McCain-Feingold, McCain-Kennedy,McCain-Lieberman,Gang Of 14, Opposing Bush Tax Cuts Of 2001 & 2003,TARP.

Now They Are Trying To Give Us RomneyCare,TARP, Cynical Flip-Flops On Abortion, Gays, Refuses to Sign Pro-Life Pledge, Illegal Immigrants, "Little Chain Saw Al" At Bain, Crony Capitalism Campaign Money Trail.....

The Tea Party Rebellion Is Here And In Iowa.

Jack| 1.5.12 @ 12:29AM

It cheers me to see how a statist puppet like you can hold so dear to their superiority with such false, unwarranted pride. What's to say that if Paul goes third party, that a vote for whatever snively pompous prick is chosen to run by the Republicans is not equally responsible in getting Obama re-elected, if it so be the case.

A third party candidate has no less legitimacy than a Republican or a Democrat. In most democratic countries, there are anywhere from four to a dozen parties represented in government. Heck, if you look at the US historically, the modern Republicans and Democrats are less than 100 years old, much like this two party notion.

Ivan| 1.3.12 @ 2:56PM

Lord: "What happens after all the caucus and primary ballots are counted -- and Not Ron Paul is the GOP nominee?"

this is answered very simply: what if Ron Paul IS a nominee? Would Mark Levin and other neocon idiots vote for him? I think that the question answers itself. So, Ron Paul should run as a third party candidate to make sure Obama, and not Obama-lite with R behind his name is elected. And give us some time to develop an organization and defeat the republican establishment.

I listened to Mark Levin's show yesterday. He was completely inconsistent. In the first half of the show he was trashing Mitt Romney as a moderate big government liberal who is not going to do anything to abolish the Obamacare (which is according to Levin a crucial issue on which the future of America is hanging).

And then he went on to say that he would vote for Romney nevertheless, if he is a nominee! It does not make much sense, does it? If Romney is really that bad (and I agree he is) would not be then much better to prevent him from delivering us another GWB term? What;s the purpose of having another phony, fake, plastic men in the White House, only because he has an R instead of D behind his name?

Even worse, Levin spent much time criticizing George Will for his description of the election furry as an unhealthy obsession with the presidency. The Congress and the Senate are tootles, claims Levin, even with the republican majorities because they would be led by the phonies Boehner and McConnell who would cave in every time in negotiations with Obama. Hence, we need to be concentrated on the presidency...and wait, to support an even worse phony than McConnell and Boehner for the president, in the hope that will change everything

tire if all the ad hom | 1.3.12 @ 6:43PM

Incredible that anyone would say let obama win and work on organization. Can you not see the state this country will be in if obama gets 4 years as a lame duck (and if it's only 4 years, we'll be lucky).

P.S. Listening to Levin now. Another caller using the term "neo-con." Don't Paulista's realize that we all know you're talking about Jews?

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 9:01PM

Uh Oh !

The RINO-CINO Apologists Are Attempting To Play Their Dog Eared Anti-Jew Card Again.

The Tea Party Rebellion Is Here And In Iowa.

Jack| 1.5.12 @ 12:33AM

Funny you say that. I know a few Libertarians and Paul supporters whose grandparents were Holocaust survivors. I also know of several Facist regimes where groups persecuted their opponents by spreading false and slanderous information about them...

Crassus| 1.3.12 @ 3:05PM

Nothing like another article by Jeffrey Lord to bring the Paultards out of their dank caves again. They're like the old Bourbon dynasty in France. They forget nothing and they learn nothing.

Hobbes| 1.3.12 @ 3:11PM

Ron Paul is in first place for the GOP nomination. Why don't you ask Romney or Santorum, et al if they will run Third Party? Oh. Cause you and all the neocons hate Ron Paul.

Simon Templar| 1.3.12 @ 3:51PM

I did, they said no, they will not.
We do not hate Ron Paul, we hate you. No, not really hate, just disgust, irritation,and frustration with your attitude, rhetoric, and fanaticism.

You and your fellow fanatics really are missing the big picture here. If you really believed that Paul had a real chance at nomination, you would not be alienating, aggravating, and attacking the rest of us. If Paul was really looking like the likely candidate you would be approaching people with a positive message and making peace with the rest of us to win our support. You return the same, however, and react with the same foul rhetoric. I suggest you take it down a thousand notches if you want to be taken seriously. You need all us so-called neo cons to win..something you keep forgetting.

tire if all the ad hom | 1.3.12 @ 6:44PM

Bingo. Neo-con. Check -- It's either that or "war-monger' from the Paulista's. How come you guys use dated, outworn progressive slang?

Ed| 1.3.12 @ 3:31PM

Ron Paul is an evil little jew hating troll. I'm sorry but I can't sympathize for the grown man, his son, who backs him full force. Unfortunately, I am thinking that Rand is Ron with more sense than to spout off.

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 7:16PM

You're An Israel Smear Bund Liar, Little Eddie.

" Written By : Eric Dondero

Fmr. Senior Aide, US Cong. Ron Paul, 1997 – 2003
Campaign Coordinator, Ron Paul for Congress, 1995/96
National Organizer, Draft Ron Paul for President, 1991/92
Travel Aide/Personal Asst. Ron Paul, Libertarian for President
1987/88

I have been asked by various media the last few days for my comments, view of the current situation regarding my former boss Ron Paul, as he runs for the presidency on the Republican ticket.

I’ve noticed in some media that my words have been twisted and used for an agenda from both sides. And I wish to set the record straight with media that I trust and know will get the story right: conservative/libertarian-conservative bloggers.

Is Ron Paul a “racist.” In short, No. I worked for the man for 12 years, pretty consistently. I never heard a racist word expressed towards Blacks or Jews come out of his mouth. Not once. And understand, I was his close personal assistant. It’s safe to say that I was with him on the campaign trail more than any other individual, whether it be traveling to Fairbanks, Alaska or Boston, Massachusetts in the presidential race, or across the congressional district to San Antonio or Corpus Christi, Texas.

He has frequently hired blacks for his office staff, starting as early as 1988 for the Libertarian campaign. He has also hired many Hispanics, including his current District staffer Dianna Gilbert-Kile.
Is Ron Paul an Anti-Semite? Absolutely No. As a Jew, (half on my mother’s side), I can categorically say that I never heard anything out of his mouth, in hundreds of speeches I listened too over the years, or in my personal presence that could be called, “Anti-Semite.” No slurs. No derogatory remarks. "

The tea Party Rebellion Is Here And In Iowa.

Simon Templar| 1.3.12 @ 3:40PM

Something to consider...
Let us say that Paul does indeed do exactly what he has done in the past and disrupts the general election with a third party run and subsequently reelects the socialist. Now, has anyone considered the political fallout and consequences besides the obvious ones?

I believe the anger will be at a pitch never seen before as conservatives reflect over not only the third party run but the historic divisiveness, chaos, negativity, and attacks that were launched by his fanatic followers against all the other candidates and conservatives in general that are not excited and fanatical about Ron Paul as they are.

Levin is just reflecting this anger as he contemplates the consequences of all of this.

Look at the comments in this thread. They do not really care about this nation nor does Ron Paul. They are perfectly ok with The Socialist's reelection if Ron Paul is not nominated. This is straight out of the their comments, verbatim.

So, to be fair, the paulbots can not be blamed for all of it either and what will likely happen if conservatives do not wrestle this nomination process away from the establishment beltway RINO's. If conservatives can not stop themselves from listening to MSM and RINO propaganda and scare tactics that these two groups have used to destroy ALL of the candidates including Ron Paul then we have only ourselves to blame for the destruction of this nation and a potentially irreversible and historic shift.

Sop even listening to the negative propaganda of the talking heads out here as well as the candidates handlers. Start acting like thinking citizens of a great Republic and stop acting like a herd of cows that are spooked by the latest campaign televison commercial.

Stop this unholy and self destructive whining about how these candidates do not measure up to some ridiculous iconic super hero dream candidate. Damn, stop judging our candidates with standards and measurements handed to you by the socialist democrats.

Iowa is one state out of fifty. The rest of us have a say as well...fight for what you believe in...

Sean| 1.3.12 @ 4:04PM

To add to your comment, the reason that the "Paulbots" (I guess you can consider me one) have no problem with the Socialist getting 4 more years if Ron Paul doesn't get the nomination, is because we are sick and tired of replacing big government, war-mongering, civil and economic liberty-destroying hacks with the same kind of hack from a different party.

It is the 2 party system is has led us here, and Ron Paul has been the ONLY principled man fighting both parties for literally decades.

Think about it this way: We have been intervening militarily for decades in the Middle East and all it does is kill our own soldiers and bankrupt us. Oh wait---it builds up more resentment against us--forgot about that one.

Seriously---Ron Paul is the only non 2-Party candidate not bought band paid for by large special corporate and political interests.

To us, it is NOT about "defeating Obama" because replacing Obama-D with Obama-R doesn't do jack. We want to restore this country, and only want candidate's ideas match the ideas necessary to do just that.

Ed| 1.3.12 @ 4:11PM

Actually, it's Paultard and RonPaul has had his hand in the cookie jar for decades. You guys, however, spend too much time in worship of DearLeader to realize it. He's spent his life in Washington. There are certain things that Paultards believe: 1) World's problems caused by Jews/America; 2) Any strikes against Jews/America are deserved; 3) Ron Paul is principled even though he's had his hand in the till like all other pols; 4) Ron Paul reflects original constitutional thinking (debunked by history, of course). Sorry you feel picked on but you show your stupidity and ugliness every time your crew shows up.

b| 1.3.12 @ 4:22PM

enjoy 4 more years of Obama, Ed!

Ed| 1.3.12 @ 4:24PM

As opposed to the candidate of jew hating neo-nazis? Unfortunately, Obama would be the lesser of two evils (and, in Paul's case, I do mean evil).

b| 1.3.12 @ 4:32PM

ROFL XD!! You are a riot

Jack| 1.5.12 @ 12:43AM

Yes... so if supporting him makes me a Jew hating Neo-Nazi... does that mean that I blame some of my closest friends and family for all of America's problems?

Well we're on the subject of ludicrous nonsense (ie, your post), Paul is Evil? Does that mean supporting the intent of the constitution, and the merits the US was founded on, is also Evil? Is LIBERTY evil? Democratically responsible government is EVIL?

If by whatever flawed moral continuity you are right, EVIL seems to be sounding rather nice compared to being suppressed and over taxed by a revolving door of Statist, Corporatist hacks.

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 7:18PM

You're An Israel Firster Smear Bund Liar, Little Eddie.

" Written By : Eric Dondero

Fmr. Senior Aide, US Cong. Ron Paul, 1997 – 2003
Campaign Coordinator, Ron Paul for Congress, 1995/96
National Organizer, Draft Ron Paul for President, 1991/92
Travel Aide/Personal Asst. Ron Paul, Libertarian for President
1987/88

I have been asked by various media the last few days for my comments, view of the current situation regarding my former boss Ron Paul, as he runs for the presidency on the Republican ticket.

I’ve noticed in some media that my words have been twisted and used for an agenda from both sides. And I wish to set the record straight with media that I trust and know will get the story right: conservative/libertarian-conservative bloggers.

Is Ron Paul a “racist.” In short, No. I worked for the man for 12 years, pretty consistently. I never heard a racist word expressed towards Blacks or Jews come out of his mouth. Not once. And understand, I was his close personal assistant. It’s safe to say that I was with him on the campaign trail more than any other individual, whether it be traveling to Fairbanks, Alaska or Boston, Massachusetts in the presidential race, or across the congressional district to San Antonio or Corpus Christi, Texas.

He has frequently hired blacks for his office staff, starting as early as 1988 for the Libertarian campaign. He has also hired many Hispanics, including his current District staffer Dianna Gilbert-Kile.
Is Ron Paul an Anti-Semite? Absolutely No. As a Jew, (half on my mother’s side), I can categorically say that I never heard anything out of his mouth, in hundreds of speeches I listened too over the years, or in my personal presence that could be called, “Anti-Semite.” No slurs. No derogatory remarks. "

The tea Party Rebellion Is Here And In Iowa.

Margie| 1.3.12 @ 4:25PM

Ron Paul should just register as a Democrat.
But he's too dishonest to do that, nor is he capable of ever admitting he really IS one.

Skippy| 1.3.12 @ 4:53PM

Ron Paul should just register as a Martian.
But he's too dishonest to do that, nor is he capable of ever admitting he really IS one.
Fixed it!

Margie| 1.3.12 @ 5:35PM

Call it the Reptillion Party.

Jack| 1.5.12 @ 12:45AM

And its funny, because you go on like that, and then turn around and call us racists and conspiracy nuts... good job!

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 7:30PM

Do Your Homework RINO-CINO Israel Firster Smear Bund Bigot Pig, Margie.

Dr.Ron Paul Has Been Elected 10 Times, As A Republican Congressman.

No Other Republican Candidate Has Won More Republican Elections, Including Gingrich.

The Tea Party Rebellion Is Here And In Iowa.

Margie| 1.3.12 @ 9:45PM

"Do your homework bigot pig, blah blah blah."

I have, and that's why I am who I am~ someone with a brain in my head who doesn't follow phony men dressed in robes claiming to be Christ on Earth.. that would be either one of your IDOLS.
LOL!

Jack| 1.5.12 @ 12:46AM

I... don't recall the last time I heard Paul wearing robes and claiming to be the messiah... I think that's Santorum's voting demographic anyways...

Tom| 1.3.12 @ 4:46PM

A Ron Paul Presidency would be the biggest fiasco in the history of the United States.

JR| 1.3.12 @ 5:52PM

There ya'll go again with this war mongering bull shit. Is there anything in this life worth fighting for Sean? You wouldnt have lasted 5 minutes in the neighborhoods I grew up in. I had to fight bullies everyday just to go home from school and I learned an important lesson. If you dont stand up to it they will walk all over you. People like you Sean are the weakness the Terrorists see that empowers them to do the things they do. Until someone stands up to them and shows them that we will not go away until they are defeated it will just continue. I for one dont want to leave it to my children to fight. The time is now so if you dont want to fight stfu and get out of the way pussy.

b| 1.3.12 @ 7:08PM

So who is bullying America? A bunch of goat herders? Your joking right? Lol, man America must be weaker than I thought.

Skippy| 1.3.12 @ 7:18PM

We were after 8 years of Boy Clinton's fellatio follies.
Those goat herders killed 3,00 people.
But let's double down with RuPaul and hide here in the USA.
After all, those goat herders are half a world away.
How much of a threat could they really be, Adolf?

b| 1.3.12 @ 7:35PM

The persuasiveness of your argument has convinced me. From now on every time I go to sleep I'm going to check under my bed to make sure that there is not a terrorist waiting to kill me.

Jack| 1.5.12 @ 12:51AM

There are things worth fighting for. Liberty. Freedom. Not irrelevant, misdirected wars in foreign countries, which our incompetent statist government is too busy micromanaging to bother winning, and cost our citizens billions in taxes to fund. You know what else is worth fighting over. Corrupt, totalitarian laws like the NDAA, which authorizes those same statists the right to basically turn a country envisioned as a bastion of civil and democratic freedoms into a police state.

Its not terrorists you need to be worried about JR. Its the people using them as a scapegoat to get away with shit.

adam| 1.3.12 @ 6:51PM

Do the Paulista's even see that there is a difference between the Iraw and Afghanistan wars against Al Queda/terrorist-funding and the FOUR wars going on now, where Uganda and Libya are benefitting from our troops in order to help install muslim theocracies? They always seem to mention the old Bush wars but not have a problem with obama adding TWO more under the marxist you would gladly help reelect.

You guys just say "war-monger" as if there was no difference between sending troops to Europe during WWII and sending troops to Libya to support the extremists and protect French oil. And that's Paul's problem. He can/will not distinguish between necessary and unnecessary battles.

Jack| 1.5.12 @ 12:58AM

Um... what? As far as I and my fellow Paul supporters are concerned, Obama's actions just as bad, if not worse than getting involved in Iraq, and to the same extent Afghanistan.

But as far as we're concerned, replacing him with a war mongering republican would be just as bad. If you are using "well, atleast he isn't Obama," as your excuse to vote for your candidate, than maybe you should rethink your voting strategy...

And I don't recall any of us mentioning that World War II was the same as Libya... given that our involvement was a direct response to Japanese aggression...

Doug F.| 1.3.12 @ 3:43PM

Levin is a bully punk, I am a democrat and even though I think they are all GOP punks he just enforced it.... Go after someones family for running third party? wtf

Swibbie| 1.3.12 @ 4:03PM

Kind of like the democrats going after Sarah Palin's family, isn't it?

The hypocrisy of democrats like you never ceases to amaze me.

b| 1.3.12 @ 4:38PM

Swibbie,
Do you honestly believe that because the democratic party did wrong the republican party should be able to do the same.
Are not somethings, such as threatening ones family, inherently wrong regardless of who the agent is?

Skippy| 1.3.12 @ 4:54PM

Sauce for the goose and all...

JR| 1.3.12 @ 5:53PM

Give me a break B all he said was he was going to have him defeated in an election. so once again stfu.

b| 1.3.12 @ 7:02PM

JR,
"Going after the Paul's family," is the language that both Doug F. and Swibbie used in their posts. Swibbie did not make a qualitative distinction in how that quote was used. She accepted at face value that Levine was going after Paul's family and then went on to draw a parallel equivalency to democrats going after Palin's family.

To me this kind of response speaks to the lack of morality that pervades our political atmosphere. People no longer condemn amoral actions for the inherent wrong. Rather, they embrace a species of partisan moral relativism. "Yeah, Obama did this, but so did Bush;" or "Sure Delay did this when Republicans were in power, but it is not as bad as what Pelosi did..." become popular refrains. In making such rationalizations these people tacitly absolve their own party's corruption. This is a sign of a morally bankrupt culture and political system.

adam| 1.3.12 @ 6:52PM

No. Going after someone for campaigning for a candidate who would reelect obama.

Brian| 1.3.12 @ 3:49PM

the republican party for sometime now is no longer interested in liberty, nothing but flip flopping pretenders. Mark LEvin is a hardlined pro-israel supporter who will blindly IGNORES even what Israel says and WANTS when DEFENDING ITS OWNSELF. Levin is just a closed minded fool who has rembrace and has replaced it with military overtones and facist propoganda.

adam| 1.3.12 @ 6:55PM

Levin's about as anti-facist as you can get, since he disagrees with giving government any more power than the constituion allows. A facist is one who wants the government to have all the power over citizens.

Sean| 1.3.12 @ 3:54PM

Mark Levin is pathetic just like the others. Even Glenn Beck today spent about 25 minutes on his show uninterrupted just calling Ron Paul a racist.

Even though the quotes (even if he did write some of them them) are completely made up.

Ron Paul never said “[O]ur country is being destroyed by a group of actual and potential terrorists—and they can be identified by the color of their skin," like the media says.

Rather, he said “Regardless of what the media tell us, most white Americans are not going to believe that they are at fault for what blacks have done to cities across America. The professional blacks may have cowed the elites, but good sense survives at the grass roots. Many more are going to have difficulty avoiding the belief that our country is being destroyed by a group of actual and potential terrorists—and they can be identified by the color of their skin. This conclusion may not be entirely fair, but it is, for many, entirely unavoidable.”

Notice how his last sentence laments the racism depicts him as lamenting the unfair racism in this country.

Don't be fooled by the media---Ron Paul 2012

Eric| 1.3.12 @ 3:55PM

Going after someone's family for their political move? Wow...sounds like the mafia, to me.

Tom| 1.3.12 @ 4:59PM

Not when you've been stabbed in the back twice, and his punk son is attempting to use you to further his and his nutjob father's agenda.

adam| 1.3.12 @ 6:56PM

He is going after one person who is campaigning for someone who might help get obama four more years.

James Anthony| 1.3.12 @ 3:59PM

Give me a break. Levin hides in an underground bunker in Fairfax County, VA and talks tough from behind a microphone. As for Ron Paul - he couldn't get arrested 6 weeks ago - son much for GOP loyalty. IF you don't want Obama - then back Ron Paul. Levin is proposing exactly what he says RP is doing - abandoning the one candidate who can pull votes from across the board unlike any other GOP prospect. Romeny vs Obama? Forget about it.

David| 1.3.12 @ 4:00PM

Then you have some that believe a 3rd world Iran has the capabilities to send a weapon over here. LOL they dont even have a Navy. Poor sheep. Keep watching TV and buy a bunker!

David| 1.3.12 @ 4:00PM

Then you have some that believe a 3rd world Iran has the capabilities to send a weapon over here. LOL they dont even have a Navy. Poor sheep. Keep watching TV and buy a bunker!

Skippy| 1.3.12 @ 4:55PM

Still smoking that ragweed!

Tom| 1.3.12 @ 4:58PM

Well, just over ten years, a guy hiding in caves in Afghanistan managed to orchestrate the murders of 3,000 Americans by using plane bombs.

Skippy| 1.3.12 @ 5:02PM

That disaster is merely concrete evidence of how much a blowjob can distract a POTUS.

JR| 1.3.12 @ 5:56PM

Dont need much of a Navy if you have the bomb to hold the world hostage. Especially with weak minded jack assses like yourself David.

JBG| 1.3.12 @ 4:03PM

It doesn't matter if Paul runs 3rd Party or not. If he is not the GOP nominee Obama will win. No RP supporter will vote for the other candidates. They will either sit home or write him in on the ballot. And the GOP will have no one to blame but themselves for losing. You can't treat a candidate the way he's treated and expect his supporters to be forgiving. Do I expect RP to get the nomination? No. Romney will get it and Obama will defeat him in the general election due in part to a large portion of voters who believe in RP's message. They will never back the GOP candidate. These articles getting mad over RP possibly running 3rd Party are ridiculous. He doesn't have to run in order for the GOP to lose. His treatment throughout this campaign has made sure of their defeat.

Tom| 1.3.12 @ 4:56PM

Good riddance to bad rubbish.

Paultards can go back to their padded cells and enjoy their Collector's Editions of Mein Kampf for the next four years until the next edition.

Justin Malkin| 1.3.12 @ 5:27PM

Fully agree. I intend to vote for RP in the GOP primary, and if RP wins the nomination, I will vote for him in the general election. If RP does not get the GOP nomination, then Gary Johnson will get my vote in the general election (assuming RP does not switch parties, which I doubt). I will never vote for a GOP establishment again.

Tom| 1.3.12 @ 5:36PM

Bye.

adam| 1.3.12 @ 6:59PM

You're overestimating the population of Paulbots. Their sitting home will not affect the election, as they are merely a small minority of clueless young men. However, people WOULD stay home in droves if Paul were nominated. He does not appeal to the center-right, traditional constitutionalists who make up the majority of the voters.

David| 1.3.12 @ 4:05PM

These sheep are begging for the Goldmach Sachs funded Romney to go up against the Goldmann Sachs funded Obama. Sheep are hilarious!

JSon| 1.3.12 @ 4:08PM

The other candidates aren't true blue, they're more of the same. More, 'sorry pals I can't do what I promised'. If you can't see the candidates following the pack in Washington from a mile away your blind. These candidates that have no chance are trying to improve their careers at a minimum. I've taken oaths to uphold the Constitution and am a little more then discouraged at the state of things. Where should we begin?

b| 1.3.12 @ 4:18PM

What a joke. The GOP has never been gracious towards Paul. Its members have always been smug and arrogant. During the 2007 presidential debates, I remember Romney smirking as Ron Paul warned of the impending economic melt-down--you know the one that happened 6 months later? In the present primaries, I remember wanting smack the smugness off of Rick "9-11" Santorum's face as Ron Paul was talking about foreign policy. Then a few weeks ago Gingrich pompously proclaimed that if Ron Paul won the primary, he would not vote for him! The GOP has no loyalty towards Paul, so why should he blindly toe the party line.

It is troubling to hear a 'journalist' cavalierly cheer the 'party first' rhetoric. While our country rots from the inside out from the reckless spending policies of the two neo-liberal political parties, you advocate blind allegiance to the politburo. Shame on you.

adam| 1.3.12 @ 7:03PM

The GOP does not support Paul because he does not believe in an America-First, strong defense ideology, which is the foundation of the party.
If he would just drop his anti-Israel and pro-muslim ideas, pick someone like Bolton for VP and keep his domestic policies, he could actually win. The fact that he does not do so shows that he is not interested in leading the country out of its current proplems as much as he is interested in "sticking it to" America.

b| 1.3.12 @ 7:14PM

I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but America simply cannot afford anymore war. If we continue on this path we will go bankrupt. Remember that great president who bankrupted the Soviet Union by drawing them into unsustainable wars? Well now a bunch of third world camel jockeys are doing the same thing to us.

Skippy| 1.3.12 @ 7:25PM

So let's take their sheikdoms down, seize their oilfields, and act like Imperialists at last.
If the left is gonna accuse us of something positive, we might as well do it.

Ed| 1.3.12 @ 4:18PM

RP supporters won't vote for the GOP candidate? Especially if he isn't a jew hating, neo-nazi goldbug who worries about the Trilateral Commission while thinking Islamists are just great because they kill jews.

Ed| 1.3.12 @ 4:20PM

Ron Paul, as to 9/11, would let us know that, if it wasn't done by jews or the US government (he's a truther, folks), it was a well deserved rebuff to our presence, at the invite of the area's lawful governments, in the Middle East.

Skippy| 1.3.12 @ 5:00PM

"Don't let them flouridate your water!"

JSon| 1.3.12 @ 4:31PM

Ron Paul is always being shunned about his foreign policy view on Israel. Look up the video of Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu telling the U.S. that Israel can defend itself. Much along the lines of what Ron Paul says. Why doesn't the GOP or media defend him?

Len| 1.3.12 @ 5:08PM

So you are saying Ron Paul is part of the Jewish conspiracy and takes his ideas from the Israeli Prime Minister?

Jack| 1.5.12 @ 1:06AM

Please for the love of whatever deity you might believe in, tell me you were joking when you said that. If that is honestly the first conclusion you came to when you read that, there is something sincerely wrong with you. Heck... it doesn't even make sense as a joke, really.

Ken (Old Texican)| 1.3.12 @ 4:37PM

Ron Paul and his disciples are simply irrevelant.

If we conservative Republicans can't win the country back without the lunatic fringe votes for Ron Paul, then we deserve whatever pain the communists inflict upon us.

All we have to do is motivate the great American people to get off their butts and vote Obama out.

With McCain...50 million people sat on their butts and failed to vote at all in 2008.

Screw the Paultoids! Let's spend our time getting our lazy brotherinlaws out to the polls this November.
Paultoids are a lost cause.

WJ| 1.3.12 @ 6:22PM

We can see that the rejection of MCain was a good thing. This little fascist jerk voted and pushed for NDAA.

Ed| 1.3.12 @ 4:42PM

Paultards are ready to vote. Unfortunately, they need their moms to drive them from their basement lairs to the polling booth and I smoked a little medicinal maryjane and I just couldn't find it/oh, darn, I forgot to register. Paultards are reliable conservative votes in the same way that Andrew Sullivan was.

JSon| 1.3.12 @ 4:46PM

At least Ron Paul supporters wear their candidate on their sleeve. I think we know whose more undecided.

Tom| 1.3.12 @ 4:53PM

And Paultards put their brains up their asses.

Jeff| 1.3.12 @ 4:49PM

Good! If this party is stupid enough to reject the only conservative and constitutional candidate in the race, then it has no claim on my vote come November. Why should I vote for a big-government, war mongering liberal just because he has an R next to his name?

Ed| 1.3.12 @ 5:00PM

Haven't we debated these nonsensical statements before, with the Paultards usually running away snarling like whipped dogs when you point out the various and sundry ways they are showing their historical ignorance? Reality check: RonPaul's spent his life in Washington with his hand in the cookie jar. Principled, he is not. Ron's foreign policy views are closer to the left wing than "conservative". Of course, Hitler had backers aplenty in the US prior to WWII. Ron would have been one of them.

nopaulina| 1.3.12 @ 7:14PM

Guys, "war-mongering" was ancient (from the 60's, at least) when the left picked it up as terminology years ago. Don't you guys know cliches when you hear them? Neo-con, "Dr. Paul," war-monger..It's what gives you the appearance of a cult; you'd be more successful (and less annoying) without it.

Other than that, if you don't want wars, why would you help get obama back in? He's added two more wars, and he uses the US military like it's the Revolutionary Guard of the Caliphate.

The fact that it doesn't bother you shows that the wars do not bother you; you just have a "thing" for your man. It's illogical and makes the PaulPeople look dopey. Whg would anyone love any candidate more than they hate what obama is doing to our country??

The important thing is NOT to get your "rock star" elected; it's to get obama OUT.

Sean| 1.3.12 @ 8:33PM

Actually, it DOES bother us that Obama is using the military like it is the Revolutionary guard of the Caliphate. And it bothered us when Bush used it to expand our empire into Iraq. It's not important to get Obama out just to put another war-president in. The one candidate that is not for these costly wars is Ron Paul.

Chris| 1.3.12 @ 4:51PM

What if some weird chance that Ron Paul actually wins the GOP Caucuse?

Would Gingrich or Romney run as a 3rd party candidate?

Would you support them if they did?

Joe| 1.3.12 @ 4:51PM

No more wars for Israel!

Skippy| 1.3.12 @ 4:59PM

And the result will inevitably be...
No more Israel!
The smoking hole will be quite satisfactory for RuPaul.

Ed| 1.3.12 @ 5:03PM

Which ones are we currently in for Israel? Osama didn't like us in Saudi Arabia, even if at the invitation of that country's government. As Paul would say, he rightfully struck back at us and our citizens were deservedly killed. How about Albanians-why don't Paultards ever say "No more wars for Albania". Is there some reason they obsess over jews but not Albanians? Did they learn something at one of DearLeader's Bund meetings we need to know about?

nopaulina| 1.3.12 @ 7:16PM

Don't know of any wars for Israel, but there are a lot of Americans who have died for muslims, and they're not very appreciative.

Tom| 1.3.12 @ 4:52PM

I will NEVER support Rand Paul for anything, because usually the nut doesn't fall far from the tree. In this case, quite literally.

Margie| 1.3.12 @ 5:09PM

And you'd be correct.
Rand Paul just hides it better, but he's a pal of Adam Kokesh.
Just do a little research.

Skippy| 1.3.12 @ 5:07PM

Wow!
97 comments and none from Clint!
Yet...

Tom| 1.3.12 @ 5:09PM

Herr KKKlint is probably walking around in Iowa somewhere wearning poster boards with all the irrelevant nonsense that he cut and pastes here.

Jack| 1.5.12 @ 1:12AM

Yeah... why not attack the man while he's busy... obviously having a life or something.. Fact of the matter is Tom, your consistent dribble of posts has continued without actually adding anything other than bigoted slander and statist propaganda to this discussion.

Ed| 1.3.12 @ 5:11PM

The paultards are probably having lunch with their brethren, the LaRouchies, another fine group of true constitutionalists.

Justin Malkin| 1.3.12 @ 5:19PM

Lots of RP haters on this board. They must be swayed by Levin's immature "Ru-Paul" attacks. I used to vote Republican all the way and loved the Mark Levin show. Then I read "Tea Party Goes to Washington", and finally I embraced the Libertarian leanings I had all along. All liberties must be protected (civil and economic). The GOP is a shade better than the Dems, but if I have the choice, I will vote for a Libertarian candidate instead of the lessor of two evils. What is the difference between a slow death (Repubs) and a quick death (Dems). Live free.

Ed| 1.3.12 @ 5:30PM

No, I'm swayed by the wit and wisdom of Ron Paul and the anti-semitic tirades his followers go on when they get a chance on sites like this. With friends like them, Ron Paul scares me. With a past like DearLeader's, we can't afford him and his combination of historical stupidity, isolationism and economic hypocrisy.

Jack| 1.5.12 @ 1:14AM

Again, where does this notion of antisemitism come from? Are you and yours that incapable of finding a legitimate criticism that you need to make things up to brand people with?

david rairigh| 1.3.12 @ 5:34PM

The reason Paul supporters can safely say that we won't vote for anyone but Paul is because there is no functional difference between Obama and any of the other candidates (excluding Gary Johnson). they are all for big government.

naql| 1.3.12 @ 9:20PM

The Republicans will try any dirty trick to avoid Paul as their nominee, but Gary Johnson will be on the Libertarian ticket: 2 term gov, came in with a deficit, left a surplus, cut taxes and never raised them, vetoed more bills than all the other state governors combined... Why did we not get to hear more from this guy, eh Reince Priebus?

Ed| 1.3.12 @ 5:52PM

Hasn't DearLeader been there with his hand out like every other non-constitutional and non-conservative politician?

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 7:54PM

The Tea Party Rebellion Is Here And In Iowa.

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 7:57PM

Watch This Short Video And Learn

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Hvuru-Slls

The Tea Party Rebellion Is Here And In Iowa.

Resist We Much! | 1.3.12 @ 8:05PM

anD theN yoU wokE uP iN neW hampshirE anD soutH carolinA.

WJ| 1.3.12 @ 6:21PM

Levin is a hideous little jerk. Rand Paul is one of the few conservatives left and this azz wipe Levin is going to work against him? Fat chance buddy.

The problem is that Ron Paul believes in putting American interests over those of Israel's therefore he and his offspring must be destroyed. Un-patriotic little punks like Levin know nothing of love of country.

nopaulina| 1.3.12 @ 7:18PM

Ahhh, now I get it. It's not the WARS you guys are against, it's Israel. Okkkkay. Now you can drop the "war-monger" cliche' (but keep the "neo-con" slur, I guess.)

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 7:41PM

Ah, Now We Get It. It's Not America You Israel Firsters Are For, It's Israel. Okay, Now You Can Drop The " Make The World Safe For Democracy" Cliche ( But Give Us Back The Foreign Aid Money, Big Government Force Confiscates From We American Taxpayers And Hands Over To The Israeli Parasite Leeches, I Know. )

The Tea Party Rebellion Steps On The Israel Firster Smear Bund Ass Clown.

Mike W| 1.3.12 @ 6:25PM

What a ridiculous possibility. Does this blogger really believe that Kentucky Republicans are going to vote Rand Paul out of office because some windbag on talk radio is going to "get" him. This website has jumped the shark when they rubbish such as this.

Amir| 1.3.12 @ 6:54PM

Mark Levin is a traitor and a bottom feeder. Let call him what he is.

Skippy| 1.3.12 @ 7:30PM

"Ron Paul is a traitor and a bottom feeder. Let call him what he is."

Fixed it.

Tom| 1.3.12 @ 9:21PM

Stick it up your sharia.

Jack| 1.5.12 @ 1:22AM

Well, that was a tad racist. So, we're supposed to shut up and accept being called anti-semites and racists, but you can make slanderous remarks based on people's names? Fascinating...

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 7:33PM

You Israel Firsters Are Traitor Bastards. Let's Call Ya What You Are.

The Tea Party Rebellion Is Here And In Iowa.

DevilDog| 1.5.12 @ 12:51PM

the only TRAITOR here is clint.

he is so gutless, he ran away when he saw the recruiters.

clint is the biggest COWARD to have ever walked the earth.

Ken (Old Texican)| 1.3.12 @ 8:00PM

Clint,
you are simply irrelevant...get used to it. heh.

Resist We Much! | 1.3.12 @ 8:03PM

Ron Paul: Truther. Period.

http://predicthistunpredictpas.....eriod.html

You’ll see how his positions “evolved” as 2008 neared. In a 2008 debate, he said:

“I’VE ABANDONED THOSE VIEWPOINTS, I don’t believe that, and that’s all.. that’s the only thing that is important, and so I don’t endorse anything they say….”

“I’VE ABANDONED THOSE VIEWPOINTS” = “I was a Truther….before I started running for POTUS.”

Resist We Much! | 1.3.12 @ 8:06PM

Ron Paul & Barney Frank's Excellent George Soros Adventure!

http://predicthistunpredictpas.....eorge.html

naql| 1.3.12 @ 9:05PM

Mark Levin is a braying jackass with a megaphone. I will vote for Ron Paul if he is on the Republican ticket, or Gary Johnson on the Libertarian ticket, but I will never vote for Mitt Obamney. Maybe it is time the Libertarian faction of the Republican party took their toys and went elsewhere, and good luck beating Obama without us. The more scorn I hear heaped on Ron Paul, and Libertarians in general, from the likes of Mark Levin, the more steadfast I become in my resolve. Libertarianism is the future. Better get used to the idea.

mike | 1.3.12 @ 9:28PM

who cares about parties
you mark ; to me i wish to see the republic restored and niether party seems to want to do that so you pick sides but it does not matter wicth side you pick you are only expressing your prefernce they are both controlled by the same folks that sign your paycheck i hope you enjoy your enslavement and i will fight for your freedom but the only reason for that is so i can preserve my own

TheVin| 1.4.12 @ 2:18AM

Mark Levin's comments disgusted me and showed a serious character flaw that franky I dont like. His show is off my dial and website gone from my fav. Mark, you showed your true character and its disgusting.

Nick| 1.4.12 @ 11:31AM

Mark Levin is awsome!
And, he could easily take the title of "America's Conservative" away from Rush.

wtf| 1.4.12 @ 1:12PM

Sooner or later, you'll get over him. When you are sick of endless wars or when dementia sets in; whichever comes first

Nick| 1.4.12 @ 4:30PM

Since we are not involved in "endless wars," I have no need to get over Mr. Levin, nor, do I have anything to be sick over.

Those who believe that Ron Paul will EVER be president are the ones suffering from dementia.

Jack| 1.5.12 @ 1:25AM

Does a man not have the right to hope for a better future? Can he not pursue it, or must he simply live day to day, and put up with the same Authoritarian status quo Washington's revolving door of statist presidents has offered us over the past decade or so.

Do I have dementia if I vote for something I believe in?

jasmine| 1.4.12 @ 12:49PM

Why should Ron Paul be loyal to the Republican Party? Because of the objectivity and fairness it has shown him? PLEASE. His supporters will vote for him under any party name, and his number of supporters is growing as this charade of democracy plays itself out. Go Ron Paul, go!

wtf| 1.4.12 @ 1:09PM

Levin is a warmonger.

Charles Head| 1.4.12 @ 2:48PM

If neither party candidate has any intention of upholding the Constitution, what other choice does he have? I doubt he'll run 3rd party himself, but he probably will endorse a 3rd party candidate as he did in 2008. If its between Obama and Romney, sorry, I'm going with option 3.

kingwilly| 1.12.12 @ 12:43AM

I always find it hilarious when Levin repeatedly states Ron Paul is not a conservative and in the same breath says he is voting for the "ultra-conservative" Rick Santorum. The same Santorum that voted for Medicare part D and repeatedly to raise the debt ceiling. The only thing conservative about Santorum is his devotion to traditional social issues which should not even play a role in politics.

BTW, did Mark Levin ever serve in the military? If so, why doesn't he ever talk about it? He seems so quick to send someone else's children off to war.

If Levin succeeded in letting a great man like Rand Paul lose the Republican nomination for his senate seat, I would urge Rand to run as a third party. That way, Levin would be responsible for handing a Republican seat over to the Democrats, LOL .

You want to play Hardball, Mark? BRING IT ON!

Thomas Smith| 1.16.12 @ 11:28PM

Levin is a fraud and is no conservative. He never supported Rand Paul (a conservative) in the first place...he is a republican establishment prick who wanted McConnel's hand picked moderate to be the GOP nominee. Losers such as Levin lied to get Paul defeated in the primary by claiming he would not win in the general election which was expected to be a close race. He clobbered his gop rival in the primary and he crushed his opponent in the general election. Ron Paul just might do the same thing.

Levin..you are a liar and faker...and even though I have occasional problems with Michael Savage..you are a mere shadow of what he is....if you care about conservatism you should retire from radio and direct your listeners to your superior competition.

Lynn Verhoeff | 2.13.12 @ 12:27AM

I hear you loud and clear regarding a third party run.
We don't want Obama.
However, consider this possibility: what if Hilary Clinton also runs as a third party candidate to equal the score. Wouldn't it be nice to have one or the other IF they both are free of the puppeteers.
Nice to have some independence and integrity from the middle ground.
Personally I consider Ron Paul the only candidate who could beat Obama.
Lynn Verhoeff

The American Spectator

The Spectacle Blog

Mark Levin Challenges Ron, Rand Paul on Third Party

View all comments (241) | Leave a comment Leave a comment

William R| 1.3.12 @ 2:01PM

tonypal| 1.3.12 @ 3:01PM

voiceofthecitizenry| 1.3.12 @ 3:42PM

Margie| 1.3.12 @ 4:15PM

voiceofthecitizenry| 1.3.12 @ 5:44PM

tonypal| 1.3.12 @ 5:56PM

Margie| 1.3.12 @ 6:04PM

voiceofthecitizenry| 1.3.12 @ 6:50PM

Quartermaster| 1.3.12 @ 7:39PM

Margie| 1.3.12 @ 9:38PM

voiceofthecitizenry| 1.3.12 @ 9:42PM

Margie| 1.3.12 @ 9:48PM

voiceofthecitizenry| 1.3.12 @ 10:11PM

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 9:52PM

kingwilly| 1.12.12 @ 1:07AM

tonypal| 1.3.12 @ 5:55PM

Skippy| 1.3.12 @ 7:34PM

Quartermaster| 1.3.12 @ 7:36PM

mike | 1.3.12 @ 9:39PM

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 8:06PM

Margie| 1.3.12 @ 4:17PM

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 8:08PM

Margie| 1.3.12 @ 9:42PM

mike | 1.3.12 @ 9:52PM

Tom| 1.3.12 @ 5:04PM

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 8:11PM

Tom| 1.3.12 @ 9:13PM

WJ| 1.3.12 @ 6:17PM

C4LCNCPLS| 1.3.12 @ 2:12PM

Solo| 1.3.12 @ 2:32PM

Rienone| 1.3.12 @ 2:36PM

Simon Templar| 1.3.12 @ 3:06PM

tire if all the ad hom | 1.3.12 @ 6:39PM

MT| 1.3.12 @ 3:57PM

tire if all the ad hom | 1.3.12 @ 6:40PM

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 8:15PM

Le Cracquere| 1.3.12 @ 2:53PM

tonypal| 1.3.12 @ 3:00PM

Hobbes| 1.3.12 @ 3:14PM

Skippy| 1.3.12 @ 4:35PM

tonypal| 1.3.12 @ 5:57PM

Margie| 1.3.12 @ 4:19PM

Tom| 1.3.12 @ 5:16PM

Le Cracquere| 1.3.12 @ 5:44PM

The Bruce| 1.3.12 @ 10:18PM

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 8:17PM

Tom| 1.3.12 @ 9:15PM

tonypal| 1.3.12 @ 3:04PM

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 8:19PM

Indy| 1.3.12 @ 3:08PM

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 8:21PM

The Bruce| 1.3.12 @ 10:24PM

The Bruce| 1.3.12 @ 10:27PM

Jack| 1.4.12 @ 11:49PM

Indy| 1.3.12 @ 10:50PM

naql| 1.4.12 @ 4:38AM

Crassus| 1.3.12 @ 3:09PM

David| 1.3.12 @ 3:57PM

David| 1.3.12 @ 3:58PM

Skippy| 1.3.12 @ 4:37PM

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 8:26PM

Mike| 1.3.12 @ 3:41PM

David| 1.3.12 @ 4:03PM

Mike| 1.3.12 @ 4:59PM

Becky| 1.5.12 @ 10:08AM

Tom| 1.3.12 @ 4:38PM

Jack| 1.4.12 @ 11:58PM

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 8:31PM

Tom| 1.3.12 @ 9:46PM

mike | 1.3.12 @ 10:02PM

Tom| 1.3.12 @ 4:40PM

Clint| 1.3.12 @ 8:32PM

Tom| 1.3.12 @ 9:17PM

Jack| 1.5.12 @ 12:02AM

JR| 1.3.12 @ 5:34PM

JR| 1.3.12 @ 5:35PM