I loved J.P.’s piece
on Stephen Glass today. Stephen regularly played in a card game
I also frequented, with a number of youngish conservative rising
stars. He was indeed very, very likable. He also was the best
bluffer I’ve ever known. As I remember it, he regularly won the
games. Yet even then, despite so often being bluffed by him in
cards, I entirely believed even his most far-fetched stories, like
the ones about the drug-and-nasty-sex-addled young Republicans at
CPAC, because he was just so darn good at making you believe him,
in person or in print.
The degree of dishonesty in his stories, and the number of
people and good organizations that he hurt, was stupendous. Let him
write fiction all he wants, but please, keep him away from the law.
J.P. Freire really captures it all in this sentence: “But what’s
even more damning is that Glass has found yet another area where he
can cling to the status of victim, skate along the hard-earned
reputations of others, and force a showdown, not about justice, but
about himself.”
Dan| 12.28.11 @ 3:21PM
But the law, particularly Tort and Constitutional Law, has become a battleground for best narrative.
In such a playground, a creature like Glass would be made to order.