For the past year and a half, I’ve followed U.S. efforts in Iraq
for the Foreign Policy Association. We always predicted a
bumpy road for the nascent democracy in post-American Iraq, but
even I wouldn’t have guessed at the tumultuous instability
currently rocking the country. To put things in perspective, I’ve
compiled a brief timeline:
Sunday,
December 18: In the
pre-dawn hours, the last American soldier
leaves Iraq… after nine tumultuous years spent
battling insurgency, and engaged in reconstruction and
nation-building.
Monday, December
19:
Hours after the final U.S. convoy crosses into Kuwait, Nouri
al-Maliki’s hardline Shi’a government
surprised international observers upon
announcement that an arrest warrant had been issued for his Vice
President, the prominent Sunni politician, Tareq al-Hashemi. ALSO,
Saleh al-Mutlak’s al-Iraqiya bloc (the party of Hashemi and Ayad
Allawi, the man who almost
saved Iraq) quit parliament, labeling Maliki a
“dictator”
for increasing political marginalization at all levels.
Wednesday, December
21:
Having tracked down Hashemi in semi-autonomous
Kurdistan, Maliki demands his return to face prosecution. Maliki
also threatened to purge his government of all officials who refuse
to work with him.
Thursday, December
22:
A dozen coordinated explosions in Baghdad kill more than
sixty people — the first major violence since the U.S. military
completed its pull-out.
If I put on my analyst’s hat, it’s pretty obvious that
what’s happening in Iraq, in the days since U.S. withdrawal. Maliki
is very comfortable playing sectarian politics, shielded by the
authority of parliamentary majority. The opposition’s decision to
quit the field will only secure his grasp on power. Meanwhile,
Sunni insurgents are anxious to demonstrate that the government
does not enjoy that old Weberian chestnut… a legitimate monopoly on
the means of violence within the country.
What’s most alarming to me is the fact that with every
disenfranchised Sunni and alienated Kurd in parliament, Maliki
makes himself and his fellow Shi’as gradually more reliant on their
friendly neighbors to the East.