For the past year and a half, I’ve followed U.S. efforts in Iraq
for the Foreign Policy Association. We always predicted a
bumpy road for the nascent democracy in post-American Iraq, but
even I wouldn’t have guessed at the tumultuous instability
currently rocking the country. To put things in perspective, I’ve
compiled a brief timeline:
Sunday,
December 18: In the
pre-dawn hours, the last American soldier
leaves Iraq… after nine tumultuous years spent
battling insurgency, and engaged in reconstruction and
nation-building.
Monday, December
19:
Hours after the final U.S. convoy crosses into Kuwait, Nouri
al-Maliki’s hardline Shi’a government
surprised international observers upon
announcement that an arrest warrant had been issued for his Vice
President, the prominent Sunni politician, Tareq al-Hashemi. ALSO,
Saleh al-Mutlak’s al-Iraqiya bloc (the party of Hashemi and Ayad
Allawi, the man who almost
saved Iraq) quit parliament, labeling Maliki a
“dictator”
for increasing political marginalization at all levels.
Wednesday, December
21:
Having tracked down Hashemi in semi-autonomous
Kurdistan, Maliki demands his return to face prosecution. Maliki
also threatened to purge his government of all officials who refuse
to work with him.
Thursday, December
22:
A dozen coordinated explosions in Baghdad kill more than
sixty people — the first major violence since the U.S. military
completed its pull-out.
If I put on my analyst’s hat, it’s pretty obvious that
what’s happening in Iraq, in the days since U.S. withdrawal. Maliki
is very comfortable playing sectarian politics, shielded by the
authority of parliamentary majority. The opposition’s decision to
quit the field will only secure his grasp on power. Meanwhile,
Sunni insurgents are anxious to demonstrate that the government
does not enjoy that old Weberian chestnut… a legitimate monopoly on
the means of violence within the country.
What’s most alarming to me is the fact that with every
disenfranchised Sunni and alienated Kurd in parliament, Maliki
makes himself and his fellow Shi’as gradually more reliant on their
friendly neighbors to the East.
C Bowen | 12.22.11 @ 3:52PM
Things are deteriorating so rapidly Tom Tancredo, who I assume is being paid by the Marxist terrorist organization, MEK, as reported in the Christian Science Monitor wrote an article on Human Events calling for the US to take on another round of "refugees"-- I am still a little shocked--you know my stance on the entirety of that business from another thread, and trust that adds a little color to my point.
Occam's Tool| 12.22.11 @ 4:42PM
I am shocked---shocked--to find sectarian violence and brutal government crackdowns in an Islamic country.
Reid, you seem a nice man, but did your international affairs prof just play Winnie the Pooh Cartoons all day long and tell you that Owl represented the Islamic world?
My professional background is a wee bit different. I was the Psychiatrist for the Alabama Chain Gang. During my tenure, not one successful suicide/ severe self-injurious behavior or homicide from ANY of the prisoners under my care. This successful record was gotten because I realized what type of environment and people I was dealing with, and did NOT assume niceness and fair play. As you know from seeing my posts, I can be brutal and cruel, but no one has ever accused me of overabundance of optimism and faith in my fellow man. Therefore:
Why would Iraqi Shias care if they were depending on Iranian Shias? The ties are familial and tribal, not national, Reid. And it is ALL a power struggle. Remember how Caliphs are created, and who gets killed.
C Bowen | 12.22.11 @ 7:56PM
You are the guy who wants to kill them all via nuclear bomb genocide right?