Newt Gingrich is drawing fire for
arguing that Palestinians are an “invented” people. In an
interview with The Jewish Channel, Gingrich said,
“Remember there was no Palestine as a state. It was part of the
Ottoman Empire. And I think that we’ve had an invented Palestinian
people, who are in fact Arabs, and were historically part of the
Arab community.”
Palestinian Authority chief negotiator Saeb Erakat
described Gingrich’s comment as “the most racist statement I’ve
ever seen.” So not only do the Palestinians want a state but now
they want to be a race unto themselves, too?
Two of Mitt Romney’s surrogates also criticized Gingrich’s
comments although not for their accuracy. Mary Kramer, a former
Iowa State Senator who later served as Ambassador to Barbados said,
“I’m not sure that statement gets us any closer to accomplishing an
agenda.” Meanwhile, Iowa State Representative Renee Schulte, a
co-chair of Romney’s Iowa campagin, said, “Governor Romney is
much more discplined in his approach and much more thoughtful about
the things he says.” Perhaps Schulte was referring to the time when
Romney said the
U.S. could learn about diplomacy from Hezbollah. But I
digress.
The truth of the matter is that Newt Gingrich is hardly the
first person to make such an assertion. In fact, shortly after she
took office in 1969, Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir
put it far more bluntly:
There were no such thing as Palestinians. When was there an
independent Palestinian people with a Palestinian state? It was
either southern Syria before the First World War, and then it was a
Palestine including Jordan. It was not as though there was a
Palestinian people in Palestine considering itself as a Palestinian
people and we came and threw them out and took their country away
from them. They did not exist.
For his part, Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Salam Fayyad
has
demanded that Gingrich “review history.” I agree. Let’s do
that. Consider what Zahir Muhsein, a member of the PLO’s Executive
Committee, told a
Dutch newspaper back in May 1977:
The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a
Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle
against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today
there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians
and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak
today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab
national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct
“Palestinian people” to oppose Zionism.
For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with
defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a
Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and
Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of
Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and
Jordan.
Gingrich’s campaign has since
reaffirmed his support of the creation of a Palestinian state
through negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian
Authority. But his campaign stands by what he said in the interview
and so does Golda Meir and the PLO.
RJ| 12.10.11 @ 5:25PM
I had a discussion about a year ago with a retired State Department official, who claimed to have served in the Mid-East, but was clueless as to the history of the area. God Bless Newt for speaking historical truths because all too often they are forgotten or ignored. This is one of the reasons why I prefer him to Mitt Romney. We need to face facts in order to solve problems and Mitt's approach is to play political correctness games to try to hide any differences of opinion. That approach may make some people feel good, but it gets us nowhere in solving problems.
DRed| 12.10.11 @ 5:45PM
Remember there was no Israel as a state. It was part of the Ottoman Empire.
It's just as stupid an argument.
Lew| 12.10.11 @ 6:49PM
Dred, you're going to have to go back a little further than WW1. The nation Israel has been around for a few thousand years, from back when God gave the land to the Israelites. Cool huh?
C Bowen | 12.10.11 @ 6:19PM
I can't recall, but didn't Newt support creating a Muslim Kosovar state from Orthodox Serbian lands?
I know the Weekly Standard types, and an old Red like Mr. Goldstein probably supported it--does anyone recall where Newt stood on that issue?
Dan| 12.10.11 @ 7:20PM
Just another bullseye for Gingrich!
Who here thinks that a Bushbot like Romney would have ever thought such a thing, let alone actually articulated as much.
This reminds me of the scene from DeMille's Ten Commandments, where Yul Brynner's character tries to get the throne by running down his brother, {id est ROMNEY} while Moses EARNS the throne by "DEEDS!"
So who are we going to go with, the guy with a track record of fighting, the guy with a track record of accomplishments, the guy whose sole supposed "failure" was his GENUINE attempt to gain control over the fiscal process, or are we going to go with the guy that has surrogates run off after each and every one of his opponents.
C Bowen | 12.10.11 @ 8:46PM
Follow up point:
In 2010, a Palestinian man, Sabbar Kashur, received an 18 month sentence for rape, under Israel's miscegenation laws. The woman had claimed the act--a pathetic momentary tryst, was consensual, but the man had lied about his race.
Wouldn't that seem to indicate that Israeli law considers Palestinians a race?
Bob K.| 12.11.11 @ 1:47AM
Remember there was no United States of America as a nation. It was part of the British Empire.