The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Canada is raising eyebrows both at home and abroad for announcing it will not sign onto the second phase of the Kyoto Protocol. Peter Kent, Canada’s Minister of the Environment, made the announcement today in Durban, South Africa. The current agreement expires at the end of 2012.

Like the U.S., Canada has an entrenched liberal media. Consider the lead sentence written by staff writers at CTV:

China’s willingness to consider cutting back on emissions has failed to change Canada’s rigid position on the Kyoto accord.

And what exactly is China willing to consider? Well, not all that much really. China, which is exempt from Kyoto’s provisions despite becoming the world’s largest emitter of carbon in 2007, indicated it would be willing to cut emissions only if industrial countries first met their current Kyoto targets and extended them. China knows full well that all of the signatories aren’t going reduce their emissions below 1990 levels. They were unrealistic targets in the first place and China knows it. So it’s easy for China to make a promise it knows it won’t have to keep.

Peter Kent, Canada’s Minister of the Environment, sees right through China’s smokescreen. Kent stated, “We haven’t seen any detail yet. We look forward to China bringing its proposal to the conference. But with regards to Canada not taking a second Kyoto commitment period, that would not change our position.” Kent knows full well that China will submit a proposal to reduce its carbon emissions at about the same it gets around to proclaiming Tibet as an autonomous region. Kudos to Canada’s Conservative government for remaining steadfast and resisting the temptation to bow to China.

The United States, of course, wisely never signed the Kyoto Protocol. The U.S. Senate rejected Kyoto on June 25, 1997 by a vote of 95-0.

View all comments (5) |

CHICKEN LITTLE| 12.5.11 @ 5:48PM

THE SKY WILL FALL AND WE WILL ALL SUFFOCATE IN OUR OWN CO2!!

DECLARE WAR NOW ON CANADA!!!!

Nite| 12.5.11 @ 7:46PM

Obviously they have more sense than Obama.

axbucxdu| 12.5.11 @ 9:38PM

One would hope that at least one TAS writer has been assigned to peruse the ClimateGate 2.0 e-mails and is this very minute mining the nuggets that are sure to be there from the usual sci-fi suspects. Perhaps someone in the Canadian government has done the same and has advised the government to simply say "enough"!

Delingpole was already on it as of Nov 27. How about juxtaposing Newt's AGW stance and this latest embarrassment from what are supposed to be scientists. I know you guys can do it if you put your minds to it.

beebop2| 12.6.11 @ 5:22AM

Where oh where will Democrats go when they lose the presidency and senate next year? Poor, poor dears!

squalis| 12.6.11 @ 9:19AM

Greece, Italy, or Spain. Maybe Venezuela.

More Blog Posts by Aaron Goldstein

http://spectator.org/blog/2011/12/05/canada-wont-sign-onto-kyoto-ii

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

My Generation’s Disease

Benjamin Brophy | 5.17.13

The Liberal Union Behind the IRS

Jeffrey Lord | 5.16.13

Not Ready for Primetime Players

Daniel J. Flynn | 5.17.13

Assessing a Week of Scandal

Matt Purple | 5.17.13

Oops, Maybe Government is Tyrannical

Marta H. Mossburg | 5.17.13

The View From the Other Side

George H. Wittman | 5.17.13

USPS: Radical Surgery Needed

Peter Hannaford | 5.17.13

From Bimbos to Benghazi

Jeffrey Lord | 5.9.13

ADVERTISEMENT