June 19, 2013 | 8 comments
June 19, 2013 | 17 comments
June 18, 2013 | 8 comments
June 18, 2013 | 2 comments
June 15, 2013 | 9 comments
Earlier today, I wrote about Mitt Romney being piqued with Bret Baier of Fox News:
If Romney can’t handle questions from Baier I can only imagine how things will fare for Romney if he agrees to face the likes of Brian Williams, Scott Pelley, Steve Kroft or Diane Sawyer.
Well, in an interview with Bill O’Reilly which aired on Wednesday night, Baier said that Romney told him his questions were “overly aggressive” and “uncalled for.”
Overly aggressive? Uncalled for?
If Romney thinks Baier was “overly aggressive” with him and his questions were “uncalled for” then he hasn’t seen anything yet. Wait until he agrees to an interview with ABC, CBS, CNN or NBC/MSNBC. Hell, you can throw Jon Stewart into the mix.
All things considered, how is Mitt Romney telling Bret Baier his questions “overly aggressive” any different than President Obama telling Brad Watson of WFAA-TV in Dallas-Fort Worth this past April to “let me finish my answers”?
It seems that Mitt Romney is every bit as thin skinned as President Obama.
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?