The Spectacle Blog
Newt Gingrich’s attempt to offer a “nuanced” policy on illegal immigration in Tuesday’s GOP presidential debate may have exposed his Achille’s heel, and the former House Speaker’s Republican rivals are seeking to take advantage of that perceived vulnerability.
Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann offered what she called “more evidence indicating that Newt Gingrich is the most liberal GOP candidate,” in a press release that cites a pro-amnesty letter Gingrich signed in 2004.
The Gingrich letter, sponsored by the neoconservative National Foundation for American Policy (NFAP), called for President Bush to offer a “new path” via guest-worker arrangements and to “recognize that those already working here outside the law are unlikely to leave.” The letter was co-authored by longtime pro-immigration activist Tamar Jacoby and originally published Feb. 6, 2004, in the Wall Street Journal.
“This letter is a clear indication that Speaker Gingrich has a deep history of supporting amnesty,” Bachmann said in the press release, sent to national media Saturday. “I don’t agree that you should make 11 million workers legal because that in effect is amnesty and will only encourage more illegal immigrants to come here.”
Another Gingrich rival, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney slammed Gingrich’s proposal as amnesty, as did influential Iowa Republican Rep. Steve King.
After Tuesday’s debate sponsored by the Heritage Foundation and American Enterprise Institute, The American Spectator’s George Neumayr criticized Gingrich for his “scolding tone” on immigration, saying that Gingrich had “alienated conservatives … with his holier-than-thou approach to illegal immigration.” Tim Albrecht, spokesman for Iowa’s Republican Gov. Terry Brandstad, said on Twitter after the debate: “Newt did himself significant harm tonight on immigration among caucus and primary voters.”
Roy Beck of Numbers USA, a group that advocates for lower immigration levels, said voters won’t like Gingrich’s “long-term record” on immigration.
“In fact, Gingrich’s leadership in Congress is one of the reasons we have so many illegal aliens today who have been able to stay in this country for 25 years,” Beck said in an online column Wednesday. “That’s the supreme irony of Gingrich’s pro-amnesty remarks in last night’s debate. The man who helped ensure that illegal aliens from the 1980s and 1990s are still here in 2011 asked voters last night to consider the inhumanity of making illegal aliens leave this country after they have sunk such long roots here.”
Beck noted that Gingrich had a career grade of “D” on Numbers USA’s report card on immigration issues.
View all comments (34) | Leave a comment
Related Blog Posts
More Blog Posts by Robert Stacy McCain
http://spectator.org/blog/2011/11/27/gingrichs-growing-immigration
Follow us:
ADVERTISEMENT
Current Issue
- Wincing at Cumberbatch
- Her Unrequited Letter
- The End of the Castros?
SPONSORED LINKS
FLASHBACK TO: 1995
-
Pope Culture
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
-
Why the GOP Does Not, Like, Totally Suck
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
-
Dames at Sea
-
In the Absence of Guns
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
-
The Metaphysical Martini
-
Counting the Costs of Clintonism
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
-
Chuck McHagel
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
-
The Legacy of Old John and Mother Fresh-Roasted
-
It’s the Best Time of the Year
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
-
The Bush Crack-Up
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
Clip of the Day
ADVERTISEMENT
Anommynous| 11.27.11 @ 5:15AM
Maybe the people who bailed on Cain under the pretense of the "scandals" will return.
Jack in Wi| 11.27.11 @ 7:48AM
I immigration is the least of Newt's worries.
He is Mr. Endless war, in a country that wants out of these insane wars.
He is Mr. grafter and grifter with his 38 millions is payoffs for influence peddling, for some of the most corrupt lobbies in Washington.
He is Mr. Serial adulturer who was blackmailed and rolled by Clinton numerous times while Speaker.
He was Mr. kicked out of his Speakership because of graft, ineffectiveness, being a hopeless windbag and other faults. He was fined 300,000 for his transgrations.
He has 3 wives and 2 very messey divorces
He has a young flighty wife who loves Jewelry and who runs up huge bills at Tiffany which Newt has trouble paying.
Newt is Mr. Nancy Pelosi on the enviroment.
Newt is Mr. chickenhawk like Cheney who has promised wars for the far forseeable future.
Mr Newt is against our Constitutional protections and for government excess like the Patriot Act, The TSA, and assassinaion of American citzens, with out due process. Mr Newt would make a great head of the Gestapo or KGB.
Happily, Mr Newt is hated by the vast majority of the America people and is totally unelectable. He will never come close to the Republican nomination with his mountain of baggage, both old and new.
Dai Alanye | 11.28.11 @ 1:26AM
Personally, I like the idea of a President who believes in executing traitors. Just think what George Washington would have done had he captured Benedict Arnold.
JimH| 11.28.11 @ 9:44AM
As president, Washington did hang those he claimed to be traitors during the Whisky Rebellion
Clint| 11.27.11 @ 5:38AM
" Dr.Ron Paul's COMMON SENSE REFORMS
If elected President, Dr. Ron Paul will work to implement the following common sense reforms:
* Enforce Border Security – America should be guarding her own borders and enforcing her own laws instead of policing the world and implementing UN mandates.
* No Amnesty - The Obama Administration’s endorsement of so-called “Comprehensive Immigration Reform,” granting amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants, will only encourage more law-breaking.
* Abolish the Welfare State – Taxpayers cannot continue to pay the high costs to sustain this powerful incentive for illegal immigration. As Milton Friedman famously said, you can’t have open borders and a welfare state.
* End Birthright Citizenship – As long as illegal immigrants know their children born here will be granted U.S. citizenship, we’ll never be able to control our immigration problem.
* Protect Lawful Immigrants – As President, Dr. Ron Paul will encourage legal immigration by streamlining the entry process without rewarding lawbreakers.
As long as our borders remain wide open, the security and safety of the American people are at stake."
Dai Alanye | 11.28.11 @ 1:22AM
All this from a man who worried in an earlier debate that a fence on the border could end up keeping Americans in rather than illegals out.
As with so many issues, Ron Paul is playing the hypocrite. Under his presidency the borders will become more porous than ever.
Clint| 11.28.11 @ 9:58AM
You Israel Firster Propaganda Squad Flunkie Stooges Are Scared Of The Tea Party And Our Co-Favorite Presidential Candidate, Dr.Ron Paul.
http://unnaturaleye.blogspot.c.....money.html
sjccoach| 11.27.11 @ 7:57AM
Gingrich's proposal is a veiled amnesty plan. He knows full well that the courts won't allow the second class cititzenship of the red card plan. The courts will give green cards to red card holders and the law breakers will once again be rewarded for breaking the law. It is a very cynical ploy from a very cynical RINO.
martin j smith| 11.27.11 @ 8:18AM
Take an asprin and call the doctor in the morning.
PattyMor| 11.27.11 @ 10:18AM
ANYONE who proposes amnesty or amnesty-lite is not the guy or gal we need. As Rush said, how long will it take the ACLU (and LaRaza) to go into court and demand citizenship. Then the bidding war over the length of stay will begin.
Newt is a great debater, but he has more baggage than United Air Lines. He took over a million dollars from Freddie Mac to influence congress; whether you call it lobbying or not. He did not write history lessons for a million dollars.
Newt has been for the health care mandate; now he's against it. He was for the global warming initiative; now he's against it. If he's so smart why did he fall for a hoax. Was it for the money?
I just can't believe that so many people are falling for Newt the conservative, he's nothing of the sort.
Newt is for Newt. And he wasn't that great of a leader as Speaker. The rap on him was his inability of follow through on initiativews. Always chasing the new, shiny pony. And we get the pile of poo. No thatnks, Newt. Never, Ever.
Bob K.| 11.27.11 @ 10:37AM
They all have baggage on this immigration issue and none of them will beat Obama until they start appealing to the Reagan Democrats who have the major job worries which uncontrolled immigration exacerbates. If these voters stay at home the Republicans can't win.
Clint| 11.27.11 @ 11:08AM
In May, when Gingrich sharply criticized Paul Ryan’s Medicare reform plan, FreedomWorks Chairman Dick Armey reminded National Review that Gingrich had been a serial offender:
Citing Gingrich’s support of Dede Scozzafava in the 2009 congressional election in New York’s 23rd district, his backing of Medicare Part D and TARP, and his commercial with Nancy Pelosi about climate change, Armey observes that “Newt entered the race with serious ground to make up with these 2 million Tea Party activists.”…
Brendan Steinhauser, director of Federal and State Campaigns for FreedomWorks, reports that the Tea Partiers he’s talked to are “irate” at Gingrich… “I never met a single Tea Party activist that supported Newt Gingrich for president,” he adds."
The Tea Party Rebellion Is Here And In Iowa.
martin j smith| 11.27.11 @ 11:51AM
Yooooooo hoooooooooo -can some one please tell us which candidate has no baggage ? I think every one of them does. the questions are: Which candidate in the end presents the most Presidential sense and which one do the voters prefer. Those are the deciding factors.
Wayne| 11.27.11 @ 12:05PM
This is the first year that I remember anyone caring about baggage.
martin j smith| 11.27.11 @ 11:59AM
How much do some of the above posters want to defeat the Socialists and Obama specifically that is a question that perhaps some one can answer.Some of the above posters I sense do not give a crap and maybe they have other agendas. Whatever it is: To those who focus on single issues_take a pill call the doctor and get some mental rest. Its the big picture that will count not this issue or that unless it ticks off enough voters.
I do not favor any candidate but I will not vote for at minimum two--Huntsman and Paul. Romney is borderline. It is up to each candidate to make their case.
Sean| 11.27.11 @ 2:08PM
You talk about defeating socialists yet you support socialists.
Clint| 11.27.11 @ 4:16PM
" According to a new Public Policy Polling survey, Paul leads Obama among independent voters by a 48 to 39 percent margin – the only Republican to enjoy a lead among independents.
“This is yet another poll that clearly shows how competitive Ron Paul is against the sitting President,” Paul’s national chairman said in a statement. “Dr. Paul is making strides not just among Republicans, but independent voters as well. This broad base of increasing support proves that the American people are looking for conviction instead of the typical status quo rhetoric being offered by establishment candidates."
The Tea Party Rebellion Is Here.
Narf| 11.27.11 @ 5:55PM
Ron Paul may have a lead among independent voters, and with his blame America talk, and wanting to legalize pot and prostitution and so on, he'd probably pick up a lot of the liberal vote as well.
On the other hand his ideas about Israel and Iran turn off large numbers of Conservatives, and the social Conservatives who make up most of the Tea Party.
I like a lot of what he says, but I'm not a social conservative, I'm not a war hawk, I favor legalizing pot, I don't think Israel deserves favored treatment etc. I like Ron Paul because he doesn't sound like a Republican. His main problem, other than attracting a lot of loony followers, is that he's in the wrong party.
RayH| 11.27.11 @ 12:12PM
[quote]How much do some of the above posters want to defeat the Socialists and Obama specifically[/quote]
We all want to defeat the socialists. What we don't want and can't afford is another Democrat-lite like GW Bush, or GHW Bush, or Bob Dole, or John McCain, or Mittens Romney, or Newt Gingrich, or... well you get the point.
Bob| 11.27.11 @ 1:05PM
Reading the comments here no need to launch a diatribe on The Speaker of the Blouse. This is just lovely to see you GOPukers destroy one of your own. How stupid to suck up to Hispanics and now he joins heartless Perry in Reagan's political dust bin.
Clint| 11.27.11 @ 4:20PM
Oh Really, ObamaBoy BobbyBooby.
"According to a new Public Policy Polling survey, Paul leads Obama among independent voters by a 48 to 39 percent margin – the only Republican to enjoy a lead among independents.
“This is yet another poll that clearly shows how competitive Ron Paul is against the sitting President,” Paul’s national chairman said in a statement. “Dr. Paul is making strides not just among Republicans, but independent voters as well. This broad base of increasing support proves that the American people are looking for conviction instead of the typical status quo rhetoric being offered by establishment candidates."
The Tea Party Rebellion Steps On BobbyBooby & His Mancrush, Obama.
martin j smith| 11.27.11 @ 1:45PM
It is up to each candidate to make their case. Period.
You decide.
martin j smith| 11.27.11 @ 1:46PM
Name one candidate without baggage !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
nessus| 11.27.11 @ 3:52PM
I know the libtards and Rino's are against it but in fact, the only solution to never ending, mass immigration (which is a plan of the Democrat/libtard/socialist types) is enforce the law.
Enforce the law. You can't work here if you're illegal. Your children can't go to school here. Illegals working here are either using totally made-up social security numbers or they are stealing valid numbers from American citizens.
Deportation is the appropriate punishment for illegal immgration. Period.
martin j smith| 11.27.11 @ 6:29PM
Everyone has baggage and that is a fact so it is not really the baggage it is who has the best and most convincing message. The nomination winner will depend not on one issue or another but which candidate is most persuasive that their vision makes the most sense to bring our country back.
Narf| 11.27.11 @ 6:52PM
You aren't using "baggage" in the usual sense if you think every candidate has baggage. Newt is in a class of his own in that regard among the current contenders for the GOP nominee. What baggage do you see in Mitt's personal life? Or Santorum? Every candidate has weaknesses, but when people say that Newt has a lot of baggage that's not what it means.
Newt is doing as well as he's doing in the polls only because the Tea Party candidates are so bloody awful that finding a non-Romney who looks like a plausible candidate has come down to scraping the bottom of the barrel. I wouldn't even be surprised to see Santorum getting a blip in the polls at some point in a last gasp of desperation.
Second, you're very naive if you think that winning the Presidency is based on persuading voters about which "vision" makes the most sense. Maybe that's how things SHOULD happen, but in reality that's not the case at all.
Dai Alanye | 11.28.11 @ 1:33AM
If Santorum had a better way of presenting himself he would be a contender. His policies are sound - conservative without being radical or impractical. He knows how Washington works, and realizes it will take time and sacrifice to dig our way out of the crushing national debt.
Brittanicus| 11.27.11 @ 9:22PM
THE TEA PARTY IS NOT FOR ANY AMNESTY.
Because the concern of illegal immigration is just simmering under the surface, doesn't mean this occupation of our sovereign nation is going away. The financial sink hole has opened once again through former speaker Newt Gingrich revelation that people who have settled in America and stayed out of trouble for 25 years, should be allowed to remain here; even with the clause that they can never receive a path to citizenship. They might have entered initially through an airport terminal as an estimated 42 % percent of overstays have done, or the other proportion who just slipped in the night across the border. Carefully conceived by numerous administrations, was to make illegal entry just a minor crime; like jay walking and not even substantiated as a criminal offense. Very well maneuvered plan and so carefully manipulated by the politicians just to make it look like the government are obeying the people, the enforcement laws.
But the truth as millions of Americans see it, that it was a bluff, a lie; just plain hypocritical words meaning nothing and that the 'Rule of our Law' on illegal immigration enforcement was never meant to work? That why this country has an estimated 20 million foreign nationals here, which of a large preponderance lives of taxpayers. Even if Gingrich did become President, how is he going to process those who are supposedly here for a quarter of a century? Then there is the problem of those who stole Social Security numbers of citizens or legal resident’s children and the dead. Surely this should judge as a FELONY? Or is Newt Gingrich going to take the wrongful path of President Obama's presidential predilection is to permit certain foreign nationals to stay; this isn’t going down well with the hard working Border Patrol or taxpayers.
Gingrich will have major problems in his electoral race on the fact, that these illegal migrants violated the law not once, but in a substantial number of cases, twice over. This is certainly happened after the 1986 Immigration Control and Reform Act. It was Massive fraud on a grand scale in that Amnesty bill. The processing procedure was so overwhelming; the administration neither completed the investigations and background checks rushing illegal the path to citizen through. But the real fraud was in the initial paperwork, as millions of phony documentation, which showed that they had lived in the United States for five years. The cost for the processing of all these millions of people was estimated to be $700 million dollars.
Today--as according to the Heritage Foundation, who has completed a thorough analysis of the cost, would be $2.6 trillion dollars. Fraudulent applications contaminated the process, many employers’ continuous illicit hiring practices, and illegal immigration gained thrust. The Center for Immigration Studies estimated the illegal immigrant population at 10 million as of November 2004, but the U.S. Census Bureau estimated 8.7 million illegal immigrants were here in 2000, and immigration officials estimate that the illegal immigrant population grows by as many as 500,000 every year.
Another Amnesty would be devastating to this country, as the millions of family members could be sponsored and placed on the conveyor belt, adding even more unfettered poverty. Eventually our social safety net would collapse, because of the untold millions would then gain legal access to every conceivable entitlement program. The total fiscal deficit on all direct and indirect costs is for the decade not including the costs of the blanket amnesty itself, was $78.7 billion.
The TEA PARTY will never be approving of another Amnesty, no matter what the policymakers say and do? The government cannot be trusted, as they have proven their dishonest deception time and time again. The costs in entitlement programs to illegal aliens and their children such as retirement, pensions, food stamps, Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC,) Medicaid, housing and every other free extra will be visited on miserable taxpayers are far beyond what taxpayers should be forced to pay by the courts in unfunded mandates. The TEA PARTY is not just about stopping illegal immigration Amnesty, but halting the further encroachment of the distended government on citizen’s lives. It is a guardian of our Constitution from Liberal Extremists, trashing and drafting a new tax code that is fair to everybody, with no exemptions to any company or any other entity.
No more privileged tax havens in the Cayman Islands, those politicians have ignored for the wealthy patronage. Start drilling for our own oil for US consumers and for us export other countries. America has the largest regions in the world of oil and could reduce the 15 trillion dollar deficit. We must return federal Department to individual states, such as Education; each agency is stagnated from the bureaucrats that run them and like education has fallen in performance behind China, India and many European nations? Cut thousands of mostly groundless regulations, thus industry can be rejuvenated and create jobs. We need real free trading markets, seeing that according to Donald Trump; not the tricks played on us by China and other countries perpetrated on as of us today. It’s a real shame that Trump, the businessman didn’t follow through with his bid for the presidency.
The American people cannot be apathetic anymore, so it times to enforce our immigration laws. The E-Verify program that has gained notoriety, but not in the Liberal press, the special interest lobbyists or open border so called anomaly. The time has come to build the real fence from Texas to California covering the whole 2500 miles with double-layer fencing. It is also the time to contact the Ways and Means Committee responsible for bring ‘The Legal Workforce Act’, bill number H.R.2885 to the House floor in Congress. Only the American voter or legal resident has a say in this urgent matter, which will produce large numbers of jobs displaced by the 8.2 illegal workers as estimated. The number to call for the Washington political phones is 202-224-3121. These people need to listen to the People, instead of deceiving us anymore. If you have further questions, go to the NumbersUSA via Google and study the facts of years of the fabrication and idiom we absorb through the Leftist associated newspapers or the politicians, who evidently are working for us?
Remember none citizens have been voting and are sure to vote in State and federal elections. Citizens must be watchful or this dire violation.
PattyMor| 11.28.11 @ 8:31AM
Newt has baggage, lots of it. Mitt has a millstone and its Romneycare. Dr. Paul has a very nutty foreign policy. Huntsman just reminds me of a swarmy salesman (sorry, but that's my thoughts).
That leaves us with: Bachmann, Santorum, Cain, Johnson or Romer. Maybe we should give Santorum another look. He's conservative and doesn't have much baggage.
Derek Leaberry| 11.28.11 @ 8:53AM
It shouldn't surprise anyone that Newt Gingrich has an elitist, cosmopolitan attitude toward immigration and radical demographic change. Born in Pennsylvania, he moved to Georgia but did not become a Georgian despite being elected to a house seat from Georgia. When he surrendered the house seat, he did not return to his Georgia "home" but remained at his true home at the amorphous blob called Washington DC. Newt Gingrich is as much the problem as is his friends Nancy Pelosi and Vin Weber. He is a Nowhere Man.
JimH| 11.28.11 @ 9:56AM
Like it or not 11 million plus illegal’s is a fact. Your options are to try to round them up and send them to the border,( I guess we would do this more humanely than with cattle cars.), or to create some process where those that have otherwise clean records, have a job and legal relatives have some way to get straight with the law and stay here. The economy being what it is along with increased enforcement has greatly reduced illegal immigration for now. It is still necessary to secure the borders, partly to control the immigration but also to protect Americans from the overflow of the cartel violence.
CforUS| 11.28.11 @ 10:33AM
The single most important "shovel ready job" in the U.S. right now is building the border fence. If it stops or slows down 80% of ILLEGAL ALIENS, it's several hundred thousand less that successfully cross the border now. Stop allowing anchor babies. Stop chain migration. Require employers to use E-Verify. Attrition will take its toll.
Pointing to views and postions from decades ago as an indication of the present day person is short sighted and narrow minded. Newt will have to change his general attitude on immigration very quickly. The specific comment he made that there are some ILLEGALS that should be given citizenship is not far off the mark. There are a VERY FEW that would and should be given a review.
Anyone that can't or doesn't change their ways when they see they are wrong isn't worth the time of day or a second look. We see that almost every day with BO and his inability to admit progressive policies equals failure..
Martin Owens| 11.28.11 @ 10:36AM
Don't look now, but we lost control of our southern borders decades ago. We will grant amnesty after amnesty because the only other alternatives are a) shoot them in droves or b) conquer Mexico and do some" nation building" so they don't have to send people north looking for jobs.
Neither of which will ever happen, needless to say.
Brittanicus| 11.29.11 @ 7:09PM
IF AMERICANS DON’T STAND UP FOR OUR LAWS, WE WILL BE THE BLAME FOR THIS IMMIGRATION CHAOS.
Republican Newt Gingrich will have key tribulations in his electoral race, on a fact that illegal migrants violated the law not once, but in a substantial number of cases--twice over. That is the use of citizens or legal residents ID. Even twenty five years ago, unquestionably you had to possess a driver’s license, Social Security number as you do today. I personally carried my ID, just in case I was stopped by the authorities. Use of fraudulent ID, no matter the situation, specifically if they belong to a deceased person, a new child or as (as I even heard,) stolen from our warrior-soldiers fighting abroad. Hundreds of thousands of American have found out somebody has used their personal identities. But Federal appeals courts have been split over, whether the defendant must know that the phony ID numbers belongs to a real person.
Defense lawyers have argued that their clients should not be charged with stealing another individuals identity since the immigrants only were seeking papers, so they could get a job? The illegal aliens didn’t know if the numbers were fictitious or belonged to someone else, their lawyers say. That is a mindless excuse, as to think illegal aliens are stupid possessing any document to deceive an employer; but then the business owners are well aware of the sham, but hire the discount labor anyway. The Federal appeals courts based in Atlanta and Richmond also have ruled in the administrations favor in comparable cases, while the appeals court in Washington, D.C., sided with defendants. The ruling rejected a significant deterrent for prosecuting and deporting illegal aliens, who have been victimizing innocent Americans by stealing their identities to get jobs in America. Whether they are using someone’s stolen ID or not, they should be deported, whether they have been here one year or twenty five years, they should fingerprinted through ‘Secure Communities’ or through ICE detention. This is why American workers desperately need a Mandatory nationwide E-Verify program.
The American people cannot be apathetic anymore, as it is time to enforce our immigration laws. The E-Verify program that has gained notoriety, but not popular screeching columns of the Liberal press, the special interest lobbyists or radical open border and other so called anomaly organizations. ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION IS FREE MONEY AND LARGE PROFITS FOR BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE IN CONGRESS, WHILE AMERICAN LABOR IS STILL TRYING TO FIND SOMEBODY WHO WILL HIRE THEM. ALL I KNOW IS THAT EVERY YEAR THE HUNDRED BILLION DOLLARS IS RISING FACT, TO FINANCIALLY ACCOMMODATE PEOPLE WHO HAVE NO LEGAL RIGHT TO BE IN THIS SOVEREIGN COUNTRY. ONE OF THE ABSURD BUT OUTRAGEOUS CIRCUMSTANCES FROM THIS IMPASSE IS THEY PROTEST IN THE STREETS DEMANDING EQUAL RIGHTS TO CITIZENS AND NATURALIZED CITIZENS.
I’M SURPRISED THAT THE GOVERNMENT HASN”T GIVEN THESE ILLEGAL FINANCIAL LEECHES THE RIGHT TO VOTE; OR HAVE THEY? DEMOCRATS ESPECIALLY ARE TRYING TO CHANGE THE LAWS, SO YOU DON’T NEED OFFICIAL PICTURE ID TO VOTE. ILLEGAL ALIENS ARE VOTING AND WILL AGAIN.
Illegal Immigration is a conspiracy against the American people; otherwise it would be a straight FELONY, with prison time. All patriotic American should fight for a new law, that convicts these people or we will never be able to relinquish the hold of the $15 Trillion deficit. Why in god’s honest truth should we be forced by federal courts to pay part of our income to subsidize foreign nationals who have no legal right to be here? It doesn’t matter what state you live in, whether it’s Arizona, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, Indiana or perhaps Utah are being persecuted by the department of IN-Justice. Although all these states are just trying to stop the incessant blood-letting from the public funds, caused by illegal aliens mining into the welfare programs, instead of leaving for parts unknown? Americans and lawful residents have a right to the flexible spending, of every race, creed, and religion and political affiliation—but not foreign nationals, not so- called Liberal and democrat undocumented immigrants, but illegal aliens—ILLEGAL ALIENS—this is the correct terminology for somebody who breaks our enforcement policies.
The time has come to build the real fence from Texas to California covering the whole 2500 miles with double-layer fencing. It is also the time to contact the Ways and Means Committee responsible for bringing ‘The Legal Workforce Act’, bill H.R.2885 to the House floor in Congress. Only the American voter or legal resident has a say in this urgent matter, which will produce large numbers of jobs STOLEN by the 8.2 illegal workers as estimated to self-deport. The number to call for the Washington political phones is 202-224-3121. The legislators need to listen to the People, instead of misleading us anymore. If you have further questions, go to the NumbersUSA via Google and study the facts of years of the fabrication and idiom we absorb through the Leftist associated newspapers or the politicians.
Learn what is happening around America, that President Obama’s administration doesn’t want you to know or the Leftist Progressive presses at AMERICAN PATROL The latest news is that (65%) or three Quarters of the population in a Rasmussen poll oppose birthright citizenship of 300.000 foothold babies smuggled into America; the costs of hospital, education and a mass of other expenditures falls to taxpayers.