This is an interesting development.
On Saturday, government loyalists attacked the
Saudi Arabian and Turkish embassies in Damascus and French consular
offices in Latakia and Aleppo. The violence followed an Arab League
decision to suspend Syrian
membership, and dialogue with opposition.
The attacks prompted the following response from
the UN Security Council.
“The members of the Security Council condemned in the
strongest terms the attacks against several embassies and consular
premises in Syria…[the fifteen members] reiterated their call on
the Syrian authorities to protect diplomatic and consular property
and personnel and fully respect their international obligations in
this regard”
The statement marked a moment of unity in the bitterly divided
Security Council. Last month, Russia and China vetoed a resolution
condemning the deadly crackdown on protests by President Bashar
al-Assad and warning of possible sanctions.
Today, King Abdullah of Jordan issued a statement calling
for Assad to step down.
Diplomatic maneuvers against Assad were accompanied by an
escalation in violence on the ground. Syrian
activists report that more than 70 people werekilled on
Monday, including many Syrian soldiers who were attacked by army
defectors in the southern province of Deraa.
That the Syrians are fighting back against government forces
suggests outward parallels to Libya, where peaceful protestors have
swapped ploughshares for swords to resist an illegitimate
regime.
They may have some help. Reports are swirling that
Iranian officials have held talks with “moderate” opposition
leaders, suggesting that al-Assad is WAY up the
creek, sans paddle. I’d hazard that Iranian
emissaries won’t enjoy too warm a welcome, considering confessional
schisms between the Shi’a Islamic Republic and a more secular-ish,
post-Alawite Syria.
Regardless, the outreach — taken in context of Arab League
suspension, UN admonishment, and King Abdullah’s rebuke — is
indicative of this dictator’s waning reign.
ncatty| 11.15.11 @ 4:09PM
If Assad keeps the army, he stays. Compare to Egypt (the army went "neutral') and Libya (no army, just a police type force). So what are we hearing from the Syrian Army Mr. Smith?
C Bowen | 11.15.11 @ 4:10PM
As wikileaks revealed, as reported in the Washington Post, the State Department has been funding Syrian opposition groups for years.
I guess we can assume another radical Islamic regime will take over in Syria, as it did in Libya, Egypt and Iraq--all according to plan.
Paul McGrath| 11.15.11 @ 6:35PM
Whatever takes over in Syria can't be worse than what's already there.
C Bowen | 11.15.11 @ 7:31PM
Classic Lefty thinking, and underscores the absurdities of the last 20 years of foreign policy.
The US goes from aiding AQ in its war against Serbia, to a War on Terror where it begins fighting against AQ, but then shifts to a policy that topples secular regimes and replaces them with radical Islamic regimes in Iraq, Egypt, and again, allying with AQ in Libya.
Really makes sense to me.
Occam's Tool| 11.15.11 @ 10:53PM
In this case, true.
Sean| 11.15.11 @ 8:11PM
You know peaceful protesters are not treated well in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia sent troops to a neighboring country to kill protesters yet we don't hear tough talk against them.
Bob K.| 11.16.11 @ 10:12AM
It's a bit early to celebrate Syria's conversion to "democracy" Mr. Smith. Wait until after the slaughter and we have to send troops there too to keep it viable. Will that be OK with you?
Reid Smith| 11.16.11 @ 2:39PM
Precisely where did I celebrate "democracy," or even use the word?