I agree with Ross Kaminsky’s
comment that the the
Sarkozy/Obama tête-à-tête doesn’t constitute news —
unless we’re willing to consider its context. Aaron Goldstein made
mention of the event, but neglected to mention a crucial element of
the story. Now I find myself in the uncomfortable position of
defending the president, but c’est la vie as Mr.
Sarkozy might say…
The Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz has reported that
Mr. Obama was taking Mr. Sarkozy “to task for backing a Palestinian
request for membership of the UN cultural heritage agency
UNESCO.” As we all know, that bid that was approved despite
American opposition. The BBC confirms the browbeating.
However, the remarks do indicate a breakdown of trust with the
Israeli leader which could have wider implications for the Middle
East peace process. Let us not forget that concerns about Bibi’s
integrity are widely echoed in Israel. The Kadima party’s recent
campaign slogan literally read “Bibi — I Don’t Believe Him.” Labor
MK Daniel Ben-Simon expressed
concerns to the Jerusalem
Post regarding Netanyahu’s silver tongue, in response to
the recent microphone snafu. One need look no further than Bibi’s
recent insistence on Meet
the Press that Obama was just as much a friend of Israel
as George W. Bush, to question the veracity of his statements.
Kidding, of course…
Something to consider before we fall all over ourselves to
defend the Israeli president’s honor at the expense of the
administration’s continued support for him. We’re critically
involved in this peace process, and we need to be able to depend on
reliable partners. We can all agree that Abbas isn’t trustworthy.
Maybe it’s time to consider whether Netanyahu isn’t, himself. I say
this because Israel is America’s crucial ally, and will not
benefit from our false friendship that reflexively echoes the
“status quo” lobby.