I disagree with Jim Antle's take
that today's accusations against Herman Cain have not changed the
"state of play" very much nor are they likely, thinks Jim, to
derail Cain's candidacy.
Herman Cain is toast.
There is now a fourth accuser against Herman Cain, and this one
has a name.
One Sharon Bialek tells a sordid story
about Cain in which Cain's behavior was beyond
inappropriate.
Again, I have no idea whether Bialek's story is true, but at
this point there is simply too much smoke to not assume a fire,
even for those of us who like Cain and could imagine supporting him
for the presidency.
If I were Cain, I would strongly consider giving this up and
making sure to save my marriage.
Thinking about this in the most Machiavellian way, this news is
a benefit to the other candidates, but particularly to Newt
Gingrich and Mitt Romney, a fact which is currently being
represented in changes in betting odds at
Intrade.com. (Gingrich is up from about 6 percent to 8 percent
while Cain is down from about 6 percent to about four percent, with
Romney up slightly to 70 percent.)
Get out the butter: unfortunately, Herman Cain's candidacy is
toast.
Some of you don't get 'Evidence', making an accusation IS
evidence. It might not be true, but to go on record detailing an
alleged attack, an attack which she cannot sue for either
criminally or Civilly has weight. There are ONLY two choices,
either she is COMPLETELY liar and making this up at of whole cloth,
or it IS true. The specific details are too graphic to be
misconstrued by anyone, so this isn't a 'Judgement' half½
case.Than on top of that apparently she is a Republican 'Tea
bagger' hardly someone who would attack a darling of her
movement.She also has TWO legal affidavits from people who no
longer are dating her and are respectable in their own right,
detailing she made these allegations when Herman was NOT a
Candidate for anything.And the MOST glaring issue why use your
clout to 'upgrade' her hotel room, but not give her a job? Unless
of course she wouldn't 'play ball'? Please see the forest thru the
trees
JP| 11.7.11 @ 5:04PM
Oh yes. Like the 150 dead Mexicans and 1 dead border patrolman.
What did Carville says about Clinton's accusers - drag a 20 twenty
dollar bill through a trailer park and see what trash comes
out?
So, please save us a the sanctomonious nonsense. It would take
only an evening to make-up a CV, add flesh to it, and viola! we
have another accuser.
And no accusations are not evidence. Evidence coorberates
accusations. Otherwise, Obama would have been impeached by now.
Kingofthenet| 11.7.11 @ 5:30PM
Witness Testimony IS evidence. Ok, I get it Herman liked her and
wanted to do her 'a favor' but NOT such a big favor as finding her
some little job in an organization he was PRESIDENT of and could
have done EASILY. That makes sense to you? It does to me in one
way, if HE didn't get his favor returned.
Jack in Wi| 11.7.11 @ 6:48PM
Cain is done. Just like certain people from both parties who I
will mention. Remember Anthony Weiner, John Edwards, Bob Packwood,
Gary Hart, Jim Mc Greevy, Eliot Spitzer, Larry Craig, the gay
Republican congress man from Florida, Bob Bauman the gay Republican
from Maryland.
Now certain people have survived these kinds of problems. Do you
really want the Republicans to run someone like Barney Frank, Teddy
Kennedy, Gary Studds, etc?
I said Cain was done weeks ago. I also predicted that Gingrich
would be the next one puffed. Newt has about as much chance of
being elected as a tree stump. The whole race has come down to Ron
Paul and Romney. That is again what I stated weeks ago. Real, Clear
Politics has published a compilation of polls of Republicans
running against Obama. Romney is numer 1 about about one point
behind. Ron Paul is number 2 about 6 points behind. These are the
only 2 that can beat Obama. It is time for these 2 men to have a
real debate about where this party and country are headed. there is
no way a prowar, pro-bankster Repubnican can get elected. The brain
dead Bush Cheney voters are down to about 25% of the poulation.
Either we somehow reunite this party though honest debate or it is
Obama back in the White House. Right now I will say that the next
president will be Ron Paul, Willard Romney or Obama. Get used to
it. All the spin neo-cons like Mr. Kaminsky puts on it won't change
the fact that his country is disgusted with these wars and
warmongers.
W| 11.7.11 @ 5:40PM
Republicans will not support Cain if these charges are credible.
They are not like Democrats who excused Cinton for raping Janita
Broderick, fondling and groping Kathleeen Wiley, and exposing
himself to Paula Jones. Forget Jennifer Flowers, that was only
cheating. We do not have and do not use amoral attack dogs like
Carville, Begala, and Hillary to trash these women. We have higher
standards so if this charge is credible then Cain is gone.
Dan| 11.7.11 @ 7:34PM
They are credible.
Republicans and Conservatives who are still supporting Cain
increasingly resemble those Democrats still clinging to Weiner and
to his story.
Fellas', don't be the last to hit the ground after getting
bounced off that Cain bandwagon. It's a pretty ignominious thing to
have to get jettisoned off the thing by one bimbo after another
emerging.
Right now, Cain would do well to hire an old Clinton stalwart,
BETSY WRIGHT, she who was tasked with quelling the "BIMBO
ERUPTIONS."
Republicans, Conservatives, ------------------ is this what we
want, a nominee who we all half to worry about, who we all have to
be nervous over some bimbo emerging from his past.
We need Cain right now like we need a hole in the head.
Bumr50| 11.7.11 @ 5:07PM
No one believes her.
Watch Herman's numbers rise again, and be amazed.
His support is unwavering here, and no one really cares about
this whole thing that was considering him as a candidate
anyway.
If he drops out, we all lose.
Yes, it DOES matter if he's guilty. NO ONE believes the media
anymore. If Cain's poll numbers LAST week don't prove that, I don't
know what does.
Time for supporters of other candidates to get used to Herman
Cain.
He ain't goin' anywhere.
Dan| 11.7.11 @ 7:37PM
I believe her; I believe those women.
I don't believe him.
He was an inside Washington player, and in Washington, sex
frequently goes with the deals.
He was a lobbyist; I think he was trying to take advantage of
the situation for all he could get.
I was in a Doctor's office today when this whole thing broke,
-------------- nobody stood up for Cain. Everybody there said he
was toast.
He's toast.
And more women are yet to emerge, 'cause this isn't the first
time he was pulling this crap.
Bumr50| 11.7.11 @ 5:08PM
Oh, and if you plan on using this against Cain moving forward,
bring it.
Show me something concrete, other than your fear of the MSM.
The level of self-delusion in conservative circles is
frightening and hilarious all at once. Cain is indeed toast.
We haven't heard the last accusation. The details of this one
will check out, to the extent possible as will the details of the
others as they arise. There's just no doubt that Cain behaved very
badly while he was living away from his wife and working at the NRA
and no doubt that he lied about it, almost pathalogically. There is
also no doubt that Cain is now a product that Republican primary
voters just won't buy and swing voters won't even consider.
Quartermaster| 11.7.11 @ 5:54PM
We'll see. I do agree with you JPM, there will be more. I was
wondering why the Dems went so long before they started ginning up
nonsense about Cain because he scares them to death.
He's not toast yet, but the Dems will keep working on this
because they know there are a lot of people like you that will
stampede when they see accusations like this. People that call
themselves conservative are so often quite predictable. It's why
they are going to lose again. Alas.
JPM| 11.7.11 @ 6:13PM
To be clear, I'm not stampeding anywhere. I've never taken Cain
seriously. I believe he has moved from a .0001 chance of winning
the nomination to a .00009 chance. Ignorance and inexperience did
him in long before anyone from outside the NRA knew about his
problem wih the ladies.
But anyone who thinks a Republican candidate can dismiss 4
serious charges with the nuts and sluts defense that Bill Clinton
pioneered is a nut him or herself. Cain was fated to leave the race
early in any case. As things stand, he should leave it
yesterday.
Bumr50| 11.7.11 @ 6:29PM
Poor "wonks" just can't understand the Cain phenomenon...
I can guarantee you that Gloria Allred has a list of which
corporations and entities pay quickly to settle a suit. She and
others of her ilk make a nice living suing such companies. I once
worked for a childcare chain with that bad habit. We had to pursue
and win only a dozen cases before employees figured out it was a
bad bet instead of nearly free vacation money.
CalMark| 11.7.11 @ 6:51PM
Whole lotta irrational Cain-haters here.
Starting with Kaminsky.
Not a shred of an attempt to "wait until the facts are in," not
a shred of caution. Fake conservatives always do that for
Democrats.
So...we have a smear job based on allegations of an
earth-shattering event that happened almost 15 years ago that no
one was told about at the time. Gee, that's credible.
You go, Kaminsky. Enjoy being better and smarter than us. My
contempt for you is beyond description.
Clint| 11.7.11 @ 7:19PM
The Hermanator, " Miss Bialek, if I told you,that you have one
asskickin' body,would you hold it against me?"
There used to be a time when conservatives took exception to the
attempted character assassination of a black man by white
liberals.
There used to be a time when conservatives stood for justice,
not slander, and demanded evidence before calling for somebody's
head.
It is a sad spectacle when so many so-called conservatives at
National Review and The American Spectator decide to join the lynch
mob.
How about we see some evidence first? Wouldn't that be worth
it?
While we're waiting, why don't we take a look into which GOP
candidates are fanning these flames? If it turns out that this
year's Borking or Anita Hill was set in motion not by Democrats but
by Republicans, shouldn't we know so as to disqualify the candidate
who did it?
Dan| 11.7.11 @ 7:39PM
What's the over/under number on the total number of women who
are going to emerge before this whole thing concludes?
How many women need to emerge before you start to question
Cain's version of events.
Teflon93| 11.8.11 @ 6:36AM
How many allegations without evidence = evidence?
Falsehoods are not made truths by repetition.
If Cain is a serial harasser, there will be a verifiable trail.
Just as there was with Clinton.
Dixie Pixie| 11.7.11 @ 7:19PM
Who comes up with the MSM scandal scripts.
Mrs. Bialek pronounced Ball-Lick.
How obvious can you get.
How about “Miss Penny B. Wise” sues a candidate for poor
spending habits proving he is unfit to be President.
Or how about “Mrs Gloria Bepure” sues a candidate for an
“Unnatural” Harry Potter fixation thus proving the candidate is too
anti-Christian to be President.
In short how manufactured does these MSM scandals need to get so
even the pundits catch on to the MSM tricks.
In what National Referendum did the populace give the MSM the
ability to pick and chose the Republican candidates?
Some one needs to tell the MSM to take a hike and peddle their
trash elsewhere.
Harry| 11.7.11 @ 7:53PM
You sound paranoid. You actually think that the MSM manufactured
this event and chose the woman whose name sounds like you said? Get
a life and a brain.
Dixie Pixie| 11.8.11 @ 12:31AM
Greetings Harry.
Dude...It is called satire.
The MSM is driving this “Scandal” from day one.
The whole point is to drive Cain from the field of Republican
candidates.
My point is where did the Republican Party gave the MSM the
right to select the Republican candidates?
The Republican Party should give the MSM the old kick in the pants
and tell the MSM to peddle their trash elsewhere.
Clint| 11.7.11 @ 7:24PM
The Hermanator, " Miss Bialek, I'm here to tell you that most
definitely, a bird in the hand is not worth a bird in the
bush,"
albert constantine jr.| 11.7.11 @ 7:28PM
When I first saw the title of this post, I thought it was a
reference to "The Last Tango in Paris", which, come to think of it,
is not too inaccurate a description of what Gloria Allred and
company are trying to do to Herman Cain.
Dan| 11.7.11 @ 7:43PM
Many here seem to think that just because she lawyered up with
Gloria Allred, automatically her story is suspect.
Allred isn't the story.
Allred is just along for the ride.
This is about increasing numbers of women lobbing accusations
against Herman and his roving hands.
Recidivists usually do the SAME thing.
In the same way.
I knew of a guy who tried to hit on women THE SAME EXACT way,
all in the same exact bar. And he did that because it worked for
him. He was a liberal, big time Democrat.
The point though is that once he found a way to get tail, he
stayed with it.
Likewise Cain, once he found a way to leverage his position to
get up some skirts, ----------- he kept going back to it.
TruthSpeaker| 11.7.11 @ 7:44PM
something really stinks about this 4th revelation. accusations
made by women that wish to remain anonmyous - it is way too easy to
tell convincing lies and make the lie stick. To me, 4 women
suddenly speaking out about something that supposedly occurred 14
years ago is not believable.
might believe 1 or 2 but 4? No, if Mr Cain were truly that casual
about it, the character flaw would have appeared much earlier. And
all of them say 14 years ago - really ? not 11 or5 ? Also, why
would #4 hire Alred if she has no plans to file suit ? no.
something doesn't feel right.
Dan| 11.7.11 @ 7:45PM
And more is yet to come.
And this is still the Republican primary.
You just wait for what the Democrats will dredge up in the
general, if we're all brain-dead enough to go with Cain.
Occam's Tool| 11.7.11 @ 8:10PM
I seem to recall Anita Hill talked about Judge Thomas discussing
pubic hair on a coke can. Look folks, Gloria Allred is a champion
skank.
Kingofthenet| 11.7.11 @ 8:49PM
I will not believe a WORD of this until 25 more women come
forward...
George S| 11.7.11 @ 9:15PM
Amazing how everyone thinks like pack animals in the absence of
any facts... because women never lie. Ask Mike Nifong.
tree of liberty| 11.7.11 @ 9:38PM
what is this, last tango in paris? yuck
Bumr50| 11.7.11 @ 10:39PM
Don't worry anti-Cainers!
Us Cainiacs are "brain dead" as ever!
Speaking of "brain dead," what's Rick Perry been up to to take
advantage of the situation?
What's that? Still figuring out how to get his pants on before
his meeting with La Raza? I see.
Seriously NEVER voting for Mitt Romney again. I'd honestly
rather see Obungler get another four years than elect a progressive
that calls himself "Republican." Not a threat, a promise. And I
take three votes when I go, because my family listens to me.
bookworm| 11.7.11 @ 10:43PM
So Cain is "toast," irrespective of whether or not these
allegations are TRUE? Didn't Hitler advocate "The Big Lie," wherein
if a lie is repeated often enough, people will begin to believe it?
Thanks for knuckling under without even a fight, you miserable
excuses for conservatives.
Kingofthenet| 11.7.11 @ 4:49PM
Some of you don't get 'Evidence', making an accusation IS evidence. It might not be true, but to go on record detailing an alleged attack, an attack which she cannot sue for either criminally or Civilly has weight. There are ONLY two choices, either she is COMPLETELY liar and making this up at of whole cloth, or it IS true. The specific details are too graphic to be misconstrued by anyone, so this isn't a 'Judgement' half½ case.Than on top of that apparently she is a Republican 'Tea bagger' hardly someone who would attack a darling of her movement.She also has TWO legal affidavits from people who no longer are dating her and are respectable in their own right, detailing she made these allegations when Herman was NOT a Candidate for anything.And the MOST glaring issue why use your clout to 'upgrade' her hotel room, but not give her a job? Unless of course she wouldn't 'play ball'? Please see the forest thru the trees
JP| 11.7.11 @ 5:04PM
Oh yes. Like the 150 dead Mexicans and 1 dead border patrolman. What did Carville says about Clinton's accusers - drag a 20 twenty dollar bill through a trailer park and see what trash comes out?
So, please save us a the sanctomonious nonsense. It would take only an evening to make-up a CV, add flesh to it, and viola! we have another accuser.
And no accusations are not evidence. Evidence coorberates accusations. Otherwise, Obama would have been impeached by now.
Kingofthenet| 11.7.11 @ 5:30PM
Witness Testimony IS evidence. Ok, I get it Herman liked her and wanted to do her 'a favor' but NOT such a big favor as finding her some little job in an organization he was PRESIDENT of and could have done EASILY. That makes sense to you? It does to me in one way, if HE didn't get his favor returned.
Jack in Wi| 11.7.11 @ 6:48PM
Cain is done. Just like certain people from both parties who I will mention. Remember Anthony Weiner, John Edwards, Bob Packwood, Gary Hart, Jim Mc Greevy, Eliot Spitzer, Larry Craig, the gay Republican congress man from Florida, Bob Bauman the gay Republican from Maryland.
Now certain people have survived these kinds of problems. Do you really want the Republicans to run someone like Barney Frank, Teddy Kennedy, Gary Studds, etc?
I said Cain was done weeks ago. I also predicted that Gingrich would be the next one puffed. Newt has about as much chance of being elected as a tree stump. The whole race has come down to Ron Paul and Romney. That is again what I stated weeks ago. Real, Clear Politics has published a compilation of polls of Republicans running against Obama. Romney is numer 1 about about one point behind. Ron Paul is number 2 about 6 points behind. These are the only 2 that can beat Obama. It is time for these 2 men to have a real debate about where this party and country are headed. there is no way a prowar, pro-bankster Repubnican can get elected. The brain dead Bush Cheney voters are down to about 25% of the poulation. Either we somehow reunite this party though honest debate or it is Obama back in the White House. Right now I will say that the next president will be Ron Paul, Willard Romney or Obama. Get used to it. All the spin neo-cons like Mr. Kaminsky puts on it won't change the fact that his country is disgusted with these wars and warmongers.
W| 11.7.11 @ 5:40PM
Republicans will not support Cain if these charges are credible. They are not like Democrats who excused Cinton for raping Janita Broderick, fondling and groping Kathleeen Wiley, and exposing himself to Paula Jones. Forget Jennifer Flowers, that was only cheating. We do not have and do not use amoral attack dogs like Carville, Begala, and Hillary to trash these women. We have higher standards so if this charge is credible then Cain is gone.
Dan| 11.7.11 @ 7:34PM
They are credible.
Republicans and Conservatives who are still supporting Cain increasingly resemble those Democrats still clinging to Weiner and to his story.
Fellas', don't be the last to hit the ground after getting bounced off that Cain bandwagon. It's a pretty ignominious thing to have to get jettisoned off the thing by one bimbo after another emerging.
Right now, Cain would do well to hire an old Clinton stalwart, BETSY WRIGHT, she who was tasked with quelling the "BIMBO ERUPTIONS."
Republicans, Conservatives, ------------------ is this what we want, a nominee who we all half to worry about, who we all have to be nervous over some bimbo emerging from his past.
We need Cain right now like we need a hole in the head.
Bumr50| 11.7.11 @ 5:07PM
No one believes her.
Watch Herman's numbers rise again, and be amazed.
His support is unwavering here, and no one really cares about this whole thing that was considering him as a candidate anyway.
If he drops out, we all lose.
Yes, it DOES matter if he's guilty. NO ONE believes the media anymore. If Cain's poll numbers LAST week don't prove that, I don't know what does.
Time for supporters of other candidates to get used to Herman Cain.
He ain't goin' anywhere.
Dan| 11.7.11 @ 7:37PM
I believe her; I believe those women.
I don't believe him.
He was an inside Washington player, and in Washington, sex frequently goes with the deals.
He was a lobbyist; I think he was trying to take advantage of the situation for all he could get.
I was in a Doctor's office today when this whole thing broke, -------------- nobody stood up for Cain. Everybody there said he was toast.
He's toast.
And more women are yet to emerge, 'cause this isn't the first time he was pulling this crap.
Bumr50| 11.7.11 @ 5:08PM
Oh, and if you plan on using this against Cain moving forward, bring it.
Show me something concrete, other than your fear of the MSM.
Liane| 11.7.11 @ 5:16PM
http://www.dividedstates.com/s.....nt-charge/
JPM| 11.7.11 @ 5:17PM
The level of self-delusion in conservative circles is frightening and hilarious all at once. Cain is indeed toast.
We haven't heard the last accusation. The details of this one will check out, to the extent possible as will the details of the others as they arise. There's just no doubt that Cain behaved very badly while he was living away from his wife and working at the NRA and no doubt that he lied about it, almost pathalogically. There is also no doubt that Cain is now a product that Republican primary voters just won't buy and swing voters won't even consider.
Quartermaster| 11.7.11 @ 5:54PM
We'll see. I do agree with you JPM, there will be more. I was wondering why the Dems went so long before they started ginning up nonsense about Cain because he scares them to death.
He's not toast yet, but the Dems will keep working on this because they know there are a lot of people like you that will stampede when they see accusations like this. People that call themselves conservative are so often quite predictable. It's why they are going to lose again. Alas.
JPM| 11.7.11 @ 6:13PM
To be clear, I'm not stampeding anywhere. I've never taken Cain seriously. I believe he has moved from a .0001 chance of winning the nomination to a .00009 chance. Ignorance and inexperience did him in long before anyone from outside the NRA knew about his problem wih the ladies.
But anyone who thinks a Republican candidate can dismiss 4 serious charges with the nuts and sluts defense that Bill Clinton pioneered is a nut him or herself. Cain was fated to leave the race early in any case. As things stand, he should leave it yesterday.
Bumr50| 11.7.11 @ 6:29PM
Poor "wonks" just can't understand the Cain phenomenon...
Tish| 11.7.11 @ 6:37PM
I can guarantee you that Gloria Allred has a list of which corporations and entities pay quickly to settle a suit. She and others of her ilk make a nice living suing such companies. I once worked for a childcare chain with that bad habit. We had to pursue and win only a dozen cases before employees figured out it was a bad bet instead of nearly free vacation money.
CalMark| 11.7.11 @ 6:51PM
Whole lotta irrational Cain-haters here.
Starting with Kaminsky.
Not a shred of an attempt to "wait until the facts are in," not a shred of caution. Fake conservatives always do that for Democrats.
So...we have a smear job based on allegations of an earth-shattering event that happened almost 15 years ago that no one was told about at the time. Gee, that's credible.
You go, Kaminsky. Enjoy being better and smarter than us. My contempt for you is beyond description.
Clint| 11.7.11 @ 7:19PM
The Hermanator, " Miss Bialek, if I told you,that you have one asskickin' body,would you hold it against me?"
Kingofthenet| 11.7.11 @ 6:51PM
Just ONE question?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGQ-ISsDm8M
Teflon93| 11.7.11 @ 7:03PM
There used to be a time when conservatives took exception to the attempted character assassination of a black man by white liberals.
There used to be a time when conservatives stood for justice, not slander, and demanded evidence before calling for somebody's head.
It is a sad spectacle when so many so-called conservatives at National Review and The American Spectator decide to join the lynch mob.
How about we see some evidence first? Wouldn't that be worth it?
While we're waiting, why don't we take a look into which GOP candidates are fanning these flames? If it turns out that this year's Borking or Anita Hill was set in motion not by Democrats but by Republicans, shouldn't we know so as to disqualify the candidate who did it?
Dan| 11.7.11 @ 7:39PM
What's the over/under number on the total number of women who are going to emerge before this whole thing concludes?
How many women need to emerge before you start to question Cain's version of events.
Teflon93| 11.8.11 @ 6:36AM
How many allegations without evidence = evidence?
Falsehoods are not made truths by repetition.
If Cain is a serial harasser, there will be a verifiable trail. Just as there was with Clinton.
Dixie Pixie| 11.7.11 @ 7:19PM
Who comes up with the MSM scandal scripts.
Mrs. Bialek pronounced Ball-Lick.
How obvious can you get.
How about “Miss Penny B. Wise” sues a candidate for poor spending habits proving he is unfit to be President.
Or how about “Mrs Gloria Bepure” sues a candidate for an “Unnatural” Harry Potter fixation thus proving the candidate is too anti-Christian to be President.
In short how manufactured does these MSM scandals need to get so even the pundits catch on to the MSM tricks.
In what National Referendum did the populace give the MSM the ability to pick and chose the Republican candidates?
Some one needs to tell the MSM to take a hike and peddle their trash elsewhere.
Harry| 11.7.11 @ 7:53PM
You sound paranoid. You actually think that the MSM manufactured this event and chose the woman whose name sounds like you said? Get a life and a brain.
Dixie Pixie| 11.8.11 @ 12:31AM
Greetings Harry.
Dude...It is called satire.
The MSM is driving this “Scandal” from day one.
The whole point is to drive Cain from the field of Republican candidates.
My point is where did the Republican Party gave the MSM the right to select the Republican candidates?
The Republican Party should give the MSM the old kick in the pants and tell the MSM to peddle their trash elsewhere.
Clint| 11.7.11 @ 7:24PM
The Hermanator, " Miss Bialek, I'm here to tell you that most definitely, a bird in the hand is not worth a bird in the bush,"
albert constantine jr.| 11.7.11 @ 7:28PM
When I first saw the title of this post, I thought it was a reference to "The Last Tango in Paris", which, come to think of it, is not too inaccurate a description of what Gloria Allred and company are trying to do to Herman Cain.
Dan| 11.7.11 @ 7:43PM
Many here seem to think that just because she lawyered up with Gloria Allred, automatically her story is suspect.
Allred isn't the story.
Allred is just along for the ride.
This is about increasing numbers of women lobbing accusations against Herman and his roving hands.
Recidivists usually do the SAME thing.
In the same way.
I knew of a guy who tried to hit on women THE SAME EXACT way, all in the same exact bar. And he did that because it worked for him. He was a liberal, big time Democrat.
The point though is that once he found a way to get tail, he stayed with it.
Likewise Cain, once he found a way to leverage his position to get up some skirts, ----------- he kept going back to it.
TruthSpeaker| 11.7.11 @ 7:44PM
something really stinks about this 4th revelation. accusations made by women that wish to remain anonmyous - it is way too easy to tell convincing lies and make the lie stick. To me, 4 women suddenly speaking out about something that supposedly occurred 14 years ago is not believable.
might believe 1 or 2 but 4? No, if Mr Cain were truly that casual about it, the character flaw would have appeared much earlier. And all of them say 14 years ago - really ? not 11 or5 ? Also, why would #4 hire Alred if she has no plans to file suit ? no. something doesn't feel right.
Dan| 11.7.11 @ 7:45PM
And more is yet to come.
And this is still the Republican primary.
You just wait for what the Democrats will dredge up in the general, if we're all brain-dead enough to go with Cain.
Occam's Tool| 11.7.11 @ 8:10PM
I seem to recall Anita Hill talked about Judge Thomas discussing pubic hair on a coke can. Look folks, Gloria Allred is a champion skank.
Kingofthenet| 11.7.11 @ 8:49PM
I will not believe a WORD of this until 25 more women come forward...
George S| 11.7.11 @ 9:15PM
Amazing how everyone thinks like pack animals in the absence of any facts... because women never lie. Ask Mike Nifong.
tree of liberty| 11.7.11 @ 9:38PM
what is this, last tango in paris? yuck
Bumr50| 11.7.11 @ 10:39PM
Don't worry anti-Cainers!
Us Cainiacs are "brain dead" as ever!
Speaking of "brain dead," what's Rick Perry been up to to take advantage of the situation?
What's that? Still figuring out how to get his pants on before his meeting with La Raza? I see.
Seriously NEVER voting for Mitt Romney again. I'd honestly rather see Obungler get another four years than elect a progressive that calls himself "Republican." Not a threat, a promise. And I take three votes when I go, because my family listens to me.
bookworm| 11.7.11 @ 10:43PM
So Cain is "toast," irrespective of whether or not these allegations are TRUE? Didn't Hitler advocate "The Big Lie," wherein if a lie is repeated often enough, people will begin to believe it? Thanks for knuckling under without even a fight, you miserable excuses for conservatives.